| Literature DB >> 32218202 |
Ling Ling Tan1, Alizar Ulianas2, Lee Yook Heng1,3, Nur-Fadhilah Mazlan1, Nur Diyana Jamaluddin1, Nurul Yuziana Mohd Yusof4, Bahariah Khalid5,6, Goh Choo Ta1.
Abstract
A DNA micro-optode for dengue virus detection was developed based on the sandwich hybridization strategy of DNAs on succinimide-functionalized poly(n-butyl acrylate) (poly(nBA-NAS)) microspheres. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with an average diameter of ~20 nm were synthesized using a centrifugation-based method and adsorbed on the submicrometer-sized polyelectrolyte-coated poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) (PSA) latex particles via an electrostatic method. The AuNP-latex spheres were attached to the thiolated reporter probe (rDNA) by Au-thiol binding to functionalize as an optical gold-latex-rDNA label. The one-step sandwich hybridization recognition involved a pair of a DNA probe, i.e., capture probe (pDNA), and AuNP-PSA reporter label that flanked the target DNA (complementary DNA (cDNA)). The concentration of dengue virus cDNA was optically transduced by immobilized AuNP-PSA-rDNA conjugates as the DNA micro-optode exhibited a violet hue upon the DNA sandwich hybridization reaction, which could be monitored by a fiber-optic reflectance spectrophotometer at 637 nm. The optical genosensor showed a linear reflectance response over a wide cDNA concentration range from 1.0 × 10-21 M to 1.0 × 10-12 M cDNA (R2 = 0.9807) with a limit of detection (LOD) of 1 × 10-29 M. The DNA biosensor was reusable for three consecutive applications after regeneration with mild sodium hydroxide. The sandwich-type optical biosensor was well validated with a molecular reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique for screening of dengue virus in clinical samples, e.g., serum, urine, and saliva from dengue virus-infected patients under informed consent.Entities:
Keywords: gold nanoparticles; latex particles; optical biosensor; reflectance; sandwich hybridization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32218202 PMCID: PMC7180460 DOI: 10.3390/s20071820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Schematic diagram showing the one-step sandwich hybridization recognition procedure, which involves a DNA capture probe (pDNA) immobilized on the acrylic microspheres, and target (cDNA) and reporter (rDNA) probes labeled with gold nanoparticle–poly(styrene-co-acrylic acid) latex (AuNP–PSA) spheres.
Oligonucleotides used in this study.
| DNA | Base Sequences (from 5′ to 3′) |
|---|---|
| pDNA | NH2–(CH2)6–TTT TGT CCT GCT CTT |
| rDNA | CAT TTA GGC TGG GTT–(CH2)3–SH |
| cDNA (dengue serotype 2) | AAC CCA GCC TAA ATG AAG AGC AGG ACA AAA |
| 1mDNA | AAC CCA TCC TAA ATG AAG AGC AGG ACA AAA |
| ncDNA ( | AAC GCC GAT ACC ATT ACT TAT ACC GCG ACG |
Figure 2(a) Optical reflectance detection of 1 pM dengue virus cDNA at pH 7.0 and 637 nm via sandwich hybridization process using 4 µM immobilized pDNA and 20 nM immobilized rDNA with the gold–latex sphere label. The inset shows the color appearance of the DNA micro-optode before and after reaction with the target DNA–AuNP–latex. (b) Relative reflectance response at 637 nm between DNA biosensor reflectance spectra before and after sandwich hybridization reaction in the cDNA concentration range of 1 × 10−27 M to 1 × 10−4 M (n = 3). (c) The linear response range of the DNA biosensor between 1.0 zM and 1.0 pM (n = 3). (d) Selectivity assessment of the DNA biosensor toward the determination of cDNA, ncDNA, and 1mDNA at 1 × 10−16 M and 637 nm.
Figure 3(a) The sandwich-type DNA micro-optode response toward the detection of 1 pM cDNA in 0.05 M K-phosphate buffer from pH 4.4 to pH 8.9 at 637 nm (n = 3). (b) The response time curve of the optical DNA biosensor upon sandwich DNA detection of 1 pM cDNA at 637 nm (n = 3). (c) Reversibility of the DNA biosensor after sandwich DNA hybridization treatment with 1 pM cDNA at pH 7.0 for 90 min (R) and regeneration with 0.1 M NaOH solution for 10 min (N) in ambient conditions (n = 3). (d) The long-term stability profile of the optical DNA biosensor for sensing of 1 pM dengue virus DNA for an experimental time period of seven days (n = 3).
Statistical comparison of two data sets on cDNA concentration determined by reflectance DNA biosensor and RT-PCR reference method by using paired t-test at 4 degrees of freedom and 95% confidence level.
| Sample Type | Sample Code | cDNA Concentration Determined by Sandwich-Type DNA Micro-Optode (µM) | cDNA Concentration Determined by RT-PCR (µM) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1B | 7.5 ± 0.424 | 7.5 ± 0.109 | ||
| Blood | P2B | 3.8 ± 0.937 | 3.4 ± 0.174 | 2.664 |
| P3B | 5.3 ± 1.381 | 5.3 ± 0.226 | ||
| P1U | 4.9 ± 1.024 | 4.9 ± 0.339 | ||
| Urine | P2U | 5.4 ± 1.446 | 5.3 ± 0.283 | 0.582 |
| P3U | 2.3 ± 1.232 | 2.4 ± 0.073 | ||
| P1S | 4.8 ± 1.206 | 4.8 ± 1.659 | ||
| Saliva | P2S | 3.4 ± 0.975 | 3.4 ± 0.248 | 0.407 |
| P3S | 1.9 ± 2.101 | 1.9 ± 0.319 |
* t4 = 2.776 (p = 0.05).
Comparison of analytical performance between developed sandwich-type DNA micro-optode and previously reported optical and electrochemical nucleic acid biosensors in terms of dynamic linear response range, detection limit, and response time for specific detection of dengue virus.
| Biosensor | Transducer | Linear Range (M) | LOD (M) | DNA Hybridization Time (min) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Succinimide-functionalized acrylic microsphere-based sandwich-type reflectance DNA biosensor with gold–latex sphere optical label | Fiber-optic reflectance spectrophotometer | 1.0 × 10−21−1.0 × 10−12 | 1.00 × 10−21 | 90 | Present work |
| Streptavidin-modified polyethersulfone membrane-based optical DNA biosensor with dye-entrapping liposomal nanovesicle rDNA label | Reflectometer | 1.0 × 10−9−7.5 × 10−7 | 1.00 × 10−9 | 20 | [ |
| Microfluidic RNA biosensor based on PDMS microfluidic channel–glass interface | Fluorescence microscopy | 1.0 × 10−11−2.5 × 10−8 | 1.25 × 10−10 | 20 | [ |
| Label-free electrochemical DNA biosensor based on platinum-coated ananoporous alumina membrane | EIS | 1.0 × 10−12−1.0 × 10−6 | 2.70 × 10−12 | 60 | [ |
| Electrochemical DNA biosensor based on nanoporous alumina membrane and Fe(CN)64− redox label | DPV | 1.0 × 10−12−1.0 × 10−6 | 9.55 × 10−12 | 45 | [ |
| Silicon nanowire-based DNA biosensor | FET | - | 10.00 × 10−15 | 30 | [ |
LOD = limit of detection; PDMS = poly(dimethylsiloxane); EIS = electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; DPV = differential pulse voltammetry; FET = field-effect transistor.