Heidi W Brown1, Meg E Wise2, Tamara J LeCaire3, Emilie J Braun1, Anna M Drewry1, Emily M Buttigieg1, Maria Macco1, Jodi H Barnet3, Andrew Bersch3, Paul E Peppard3, Kristen M C Malecki3, F Javier Nieto4, Jane E Mahoney5. 1. From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. 2. Sonderegger Research Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin - Madison. 3. Survey of the Health of Wisconsin, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI. 4. College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. 5. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand the potential reach of continence promotion intervention formats among incontinent women. METHODS: The Survey of the Health of Wisconsin conducts household interviews on a population-based sample. In 2016, 399 adult women were asked about incontinence and likelihood of participation in continence promotion via 3 formats: single lecture, interactive 3-session workshop, or online. Descriptive analyses compared women likely versus unlikely to participate in continence promotion. To understand format preferences, modified grounded theory was used to conduct and analyze telephone interviews. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven (76%) of 246 incontinent women reported being likely to attend continence promotion: 111 (45%) for a single lecture, 43 (17%) for an interactive 3-session workshop, and 156 (64%) for an online program. Obesity, older age, nonwhite race, prior health program participation, and Internet use for health information were associated with reported continence promotion participation. Cited advantages of a single lecture included convenience and ability to ask questions. A workshop offered accountability, hands-on learning, and opportunity to learn from others; online format offered privacy, convenience, and self-directed learning. CONCLUSIONS: Most incontinent women are willing to participate in continence promotion, especially online.
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand the potential reach of continence promotion intervention formats among incontinent women. METHODS: The Survey of the Health of Wisconsin conducts household interviews on a population-based sample. In 2016, 399 adult women were asked about incontinence and likelihood of participation in continence promotion via 3 formats: single lecture, interactive 3-session workshop, or online. Descriptive analyses compared women likely versus unlikely to participate in continence promotion. To understand format preferences, modified grounded theory was used to conduct and analyze telephone interviews. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven (76%) of 246 incontinent women reported being likely to attend continence promotion: 111 (45%) for a single lecture, 43 (17%) for an interactive 3-session workshop, and 156 (64%) for an online program. Obesity, older age, nonwhite race, prior health program participation, and Internet use for health information were associated with reported continence promotion participation. Cited advantages of a single lecture included convenience and ability to ask questions. A workshop offered accountability, hands-on learning, and opportunity to learn from others; online format offered privacy, convenience, and self-directed learning. CONCLUSIONS: Most incontinent women are willing to participate in continence promotion, especially online.
Authors: Charisse Laura Mandimika; William Murk; Alexandra M Mcpencow; AeuMuro G Lake; Devin Miller; Kathleen Anne Connell; Marsha Kathleen Guess Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Carolyn M Sampselle; Diane K Newman; Janis M Miller; Keri Kirk; Mary Ann DiCamillo; Todd H Wagner; Trivellor E Raghunathan; Ananias C Diokno Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-12-31 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Leslee L Subak; Charles P Quesenberry; Samuel F Posner; Eugene Cattolica; Krikor Soghikian Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Sinead Watson; Jayne V Woodside; Lisa J Ware; Steven J Hunter; Alanna McGrath; Christopher R Cardwell; Katherine M Appleton; Ian S Young; Michelle C McKinley Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Kristen M C Malecki; Maria Nikodemova; Amy A Schultz; Tamara J LeCaire; Andrew J Bersch; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Corinne D Engelman; Erika Hagen; Mari Palta; Ajay K Sethi; Matt C Walsh; F Javier Nieto; Paul E Peppard Journal: medRxiv Date: 2021-04-07
Authors: Kristen M C Malecki; Maria Nikodemova; Amy A Schultz; Tamara J LeCaire; Andrew J Bersch; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Corinne D Engelman; Erika Hagen; Laura McCulley; Mari Palta; Allison Rodriguez; Ajay K Sethi; Matt C Walsh; F Javier Nieto; Paul E Peppard Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-03-31