Literature DB >> 32217798

Sacral insufficiency fractures after lumbosacral arthrodesis: salvage lumbopelvic fixation and a proposed management algorithm.

Thomas J Buell1, Ulas Yener1, Tony R Wang1, Avery L Buchholz1, Chun-Po Yen1, Mark E Shaffrey1, Christopher I Shaffrey2, Justin S Smith1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Sacral insufficiency fracture after lumbosacral (LS) arthrodesis is an uncommon complication. The objective of this study was to report the authors' operative experience managing this complication, review pertinent literature, and propose a treatment algorithm.
METHODS: The authors analyzed consecutive adult patients treated at their institution from 2009 to 2018. Patients who underwent surgery for sacral insufficiency fractures after posterior instrumented LS arthrodesis were included. PubMed was queried to identify relevant articles detailing management of this complication.
RESULTS: Nine patients with a minimum 6-month follow-up were included (mean age 73 ± 6 years, BMI 30 ± 6 kg/m2, 56% women, mean follow-up 35 months, range 8-96 months). Six patients had osteopenia/osteoporosis (mean dual energy x-ray absorptiometry hip T-score -1.6 ± 0.5) and 3 received treatment. Index LS arthrodesis was performed for spinal stenosis (n = 6), proximal junctional kyphosis (n = 2), degenerative scoliosis (n = 1), and high-grade spondylolisthesis (n = 1). Presenting symptoms of back/leg pain (n = 9) or lower extremity weakness (n = 3) most commonly occurred within 4 weeks of index LS arthrodesis, which prompted CT for fracture diagnosis at a mean of 6 weeks postoperatively. All sacral fractures were adjacent or involved S1 screws and traversed the spinal canal (Denis zone III). H-, U-, or T-type sacral fracture morphology was identified in 7 patients. Most fractures (n = 8) were Roy-Camille type II (anterior displacement with kyphosis). All patients underwent lumbopelvic fixation via a posterior-only approach; mean operative duration and blood loss were 3.3 hours and 850 ml, respectively. Bilateral dual iliac screws were utilized in 8 patients. Back/leg pain and weakness improved postoperatively. Mean sacral fracture anterolisthesis and kyphotic angulation improved (from 8 mm/11° to 4 mm/5°, respectively) and all fractures were healed on radiographic follow-up (mean duration 29 months, range 8-90 months). Two patients underwent revision for rod fractures at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. A literature review found 17 studies describing 87 cases; potential risk factors were osteoporosis, longer fusions, high pelvic incidence (PI), and postoperative PI-to-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch.
CONCLUSIONS: A high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose sacral insufficiency fracture after LS arthrodesis. A trial of conservative management is reasonable for select patients; potential surgical indications include refractory pain, neurological deficit, fracture nonunion with anterolisthesis or kyphotic angulation, L5-S1 pseudarthrosis, and spinopelvic malalignment. Lumbopelvic fixation with iliac screws may be effective salvage treatment to allow fracture healing and symptom improvement. High-risk patients may benefit from prophylactic lumbopelvic fixation at the time of index LS arthrodesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DEXA = dual energy x-ray absorptiometry; DF = dorsiflexion; LL = lumbar lordosis; LS = lumbosacral; PF = plantarflexion; PI = pelvic incidence; PJK = proximal junctional kyphosis; TLIF = transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; UIV = upper-most instrumented vertebra; adult spinal deformity; complications; iliac screws; lumbosacral junction; pseudarthrosis; rhBMP-2 = recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2; rod fracture; sacral fracture; scoliosis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32217798     DOI: 10.3171/2019.12.SPINE191148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  4 in total

1.  Sacral insufficiency fracture after lumbosacral decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Brendan M Holderread; Caleb P Shin; Ishaq Y Syed; Ioannis Avramis; James M Rizkalla
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2022-05-09

Review 2.  Treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures: A systematic review.

Authors:  Caleb P Shin; Luke D Mascarenhas; Brendan M Holderread; Matthew Awad; David Botros; Ioannis Avramis; Ishaq Syed; James M Rizkalla
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-21

3.  Sacral Insufficiency Fracture Following Short-Segment Lumbosacral Fusion: Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joshua M Kolz; Scott A Mitchell; Benjamin D Elder; Arjun S Sebastian; Paul M Huddleston; Brett A Freedman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-30

4.  Superiority of MRI for Evaluation of Sacral Insufficiency Fracture.

Authors:  Taro Yamauchi; Sagar Sharma; Sarath Chandra; Masato Tanaka; Yoshihiro Fujiwara; Shinya Arataki; Ayush Sharma; Yusuke Yokoyama; Toshinori Oomori; Akihiro Kanamaru; Shin Masuda; Noriyuki Shimizu; Kenta Torigoe; Osamu Honda
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.964

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.