Literature DB >> 32217755

Are workplace health promotion programmes effective for all socioeconomic groups? A systematic review.

David van de Ven1, Suzan J W Robroek2, Alex Burdorf1.   

Abstract

Decreasing socioeconomic health inequalities is considered an important policy priority in many countries. Workplace health promotion programmes (WHPPs) have shown modest improvements in health behaviour. This systematic review aims to determine the presence and magnitude of socioeconomic differences in effectiveness and the influence of programme characteristics on differential effectiveness of WHPPs. Three electronic databases were searched for systematic reviews published from 2013 onwards and for original studies published from 2015 onwards. We synthesised the reported socioeconomic differences in effectiveness of WHPPs on health behaviours, and calculated effectiveness ratios by dividing the programme effects in the lowest socioeconomic group by the programme effects in the highest socioeconomic group. Thirteen studies with 75 comparisons provided information on the effectiveness of WHPPs across socioeconomic groups. Ten studies with 54 comparisons reported equal effectiveness and one study with 3 comparisons reported higher effectiveness for lower socioeconomic groups. Quantitative information on programme effects was available for six studies with 18 comparisons, of which 13 comparisons showed equal effectiveness and 5 comparisons showed significantly higher effect sizes among workers in low socioeconomic position. The differential effectiveness of WHPPs did not vary across programme characteristics. In this study no indications are found that WHPPs increase socioeconomic inequalities in health behaviour. The limited quantitative information available suggests that WHPPs may contribute to reducing socioeconomic inequalities. Better insight is needed on socioeconomic differences in effectiveness of WHPPs to develop strategies to decrease socioeconomic inequalities in health in the workforce. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health promotion; occupational health practice; public health

Year:  2020        PMID: 32217755     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  8 in total

1.  Stakeholder dialogue on dilemmas at work as a workplace health promotion intervention including employees with a low SEP: a Responsive Evaluation.

Authors:  Hanneke van Heijster; Jantien van Berkel; Cécile R L Boot; Tineke Abma; Emely de Vet
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Decades of workplace health promotion research: marginal gains or a bright future ahead.

Authors:  Suzan Jw Robroek; Pieter Coenen; Karen M Oude Hengel
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 5.024

3.  Association Between Work Status and the Use of Healthcare Services Among Women in the Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Min Kyung Hyun; Man-Yee Kan
Journal:  Saf Health Work       Date:  2021-11-01

4.  Shining the Light on You:: An Evidence-Based Program Designed to Improve the Health and Wellbeing of Family Child Care Professionals.

Authors:  Laura Lessard; Rena Hallam; Sarah Albrecht; Eric Plautz; Kyma Fulgence-Belardo
Journal:  Dela J Public Health       Date:  2022-08-31

5.  The process evaluation of a citizen science approach to design and implement workplace health promotion programs.

Authors:  Lisa Lelie; Henk F van der Molen; Mandy van den Berge; Sophie van der Feltz; Allard J van der Beek; Carel T J Hulshof; Karin I Proper
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  Perceptions of employees with a low and medium level of education towards workplace health promotion programmes: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Hanne C S Sponselee; Willemieke Kroeze; Suzan J W Robroek; Carry M Renders; Ingrid H M Steenhuis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.135

7.  Does Dialogue Improve the Sustainable Employability of Low-Educated Employees? A Study Protocol for an Effect and Process Evaluation of "Healthy HR".

Authors:  Emmelie Hazelzet; Hans Bosma; Angelique de Rijk; Inge Houkes
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2020-09-08

Review 8.  Socio-economic inequalities in the effectiveness of workplace health promotion programmes on body mass index: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Suzan J W Robroek; Karen M Oude Hengel; Allard J van der Beek; Cécile R L Boot; Frank J van Lenthe; Alex Burdorf; Pieter Coenen
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 9.213

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.