Rachel Dryer1, Isabella Graefin von der Schulenburg2, Robyn Brunton3. 1. School of Behavioural & Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, New South Wales 2135, Australia. Electronic address: rachel.dryer@acu.edu.au. 2. Australian College of Applied Psychology, Sydney, New South Wales 2000, Australia. 3. School of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales 2795, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: During pregnancy, women are vulnerable to mood and anxiety disorders due to the significant physical and emotional changes that occur during this period. For some women, pregnancy can also present as a period of immense body dissatisfaction due to the substantial changes in body shape and size. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the mediating role of Fat Talk (i.e., engaging in disparaging comments about one's body shape and size with others) in the relationship between (a) body dissatisfaction and distress in pregnant women (i.e., pregnancy-related anxiety, depression and eating disorder symptomatology), and (b) sociocultural pressure to meet the thin ideal and distress. METHOD: A nonclinical sample of 408 pregnant women (Mage = 28.24 years, SDage = 5.04, range 18-44 years) completed measures of body dissatisfaction, sociocultural pressure, pregnancy-related anxiety, depression and eating disorder symptomatology. FINDINGS: Analyses confirmed the partial mediating role of Fat Talk between body dissatisfaction and all three measures of distress, when examined individually. Fat Talk also mediated the relationship between sociocultural pressure (i.e., peers/family and media) and the three measures of distress. Age also partially mediated the relationship between body dissatisfaction and a composite measure of pregnancy distress. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that women face sociocultural pressures for thinness and body dissatisfaction even when pregnant, and that engaging in Fat Talk contribute to greater levels of pregnancy-related anxiety, depression and eating disorder symptomatology. The role of Fat Talk in regard to pregnancy distress may be more pertinent to younger women.
BACKGROUND: During pregnancy, women are vulnerable to mood and anxiety disorders due to the significant physical and emotional changes that occur during this period. For some women, pregnancy can also present as a period of immense body dissatisfaction due to the substantial changes in body shape and size. OBJECTIVES: This study examined the mediating role of Fat Talk (i.e., engaging in disparaging comments about one's body shape and size with others) in the relationship between (a) body dissatisfaction and distress in pregnant women (i.e., pregnancy-related anxiety, depression and eating disorder symptomatology), and (b) sociocultural pressure to meet the thin ideal and distress. METHOD: A nonclinical sample of 408 pregnant women (Mage = 28.24 years, SDage = 5.04, range 18-44 years) completed measures of body dissatisfaction, sociocultural pressure, pregnancy-related anxiety, depression and eating disorder symptomatology. FINDINGS: Analyses confirmed the partial mediating role of Fat Talk between body dissatisfaction and all three measures of distress, when examined individually. Fat Talk also mediated the relationship between sociocultural pressure (i.e., peers/family and media) and the three measures of distress. Age also partially mediated the relationship between body dissatisfaction and a composite measure of pregnancy distress. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that women face sociocultural pressures for thinness and body dissatisfaction even when pregnant, and that engaging in Fat Talk contribute to greater levels of pregnancy-related anxiety, depression and eating disorder symptomatology. The role of Fat Talk in regard to pregnancy distress may be more pertinent to younger women.
Authors: Małgorzata Janas-Kozik; Anna Żmijowska; Ida Zasada; Ireneusz Jelonek; Lena Cichoń; Andrzej Siwiec; Krzysztof M Wilczyński Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2021-12-13 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Ching-Fang Lee; Fur-Hsing Wen; Yvonne Hsiung; Jian-Pei Huang; Chun-Wei Chang; Hung-Hui Chen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 3.390