| Literature DB >> 32216928 |
Sara Miguel-Jimenez1, Maria Montserrat Rivera Del Alamo2, Manuel Álvarez-Rodríguez3, Carlos Olegario Hidalgo4, Ana Isabel Peña5, Rodrigo Muiño6, Joan Enric Rodríguez-Gil7, Teresa Mogas8.
Abstract
The study was conducted to compare the effect of four commercially available extenders (Triladyl®- egg yolk-based; Andromed® and Bioxcell®-plant based and Optixcell®-liposome-based) on post-thaw sperm quality and functionality variables evaluated using computer-assisted sperm analysis and flow cytometry. A total of 30 ejaculates from five bulls were analysed. With use of Triladyl®, sperm had a greater post-thaw total motility than with use of Bioxell® and Optixcell® but there was no difference as compared with use of Andromed® with the greatest (P < 0.05) percentage of progressively motile cells. With use of Optixcell®, there was a greater (P < 0.05) percentage of sperm with an intact membrane than with use of Triladyl® and Bioxcell®, but values were similar with use of Andromed®. Acrosome damage in semen preserved with use of Optixcell® was less than with use of Bioxcell® and Andromed®. With use of Optixcell®, there was a greater percentage of viable spermatozoa with a lesser lipid disruption (P < 0.05) when compared with the other extenders. Production of peroxides was greater for sperm cryopreserved with use of Triladyl® and Optixcell® while less superoxide was produced in the samples cryopreserved with the egg yolk-based extender. Optixcell® appears to be a promising alternative to replace traditional egg yolk extenders. With use of Optixcell®, however, there were greater peroxide concentrations after thawing. With use of Andromed®, there were similar results as with use of Optixcell®, therefore, it could be an effective substitute for egg-yolk based media due to the greater proportion of highly and progressively motile spermatozoa at thawing.Entities:
Keywords: Acrosome integrity; Bioxcell®; Optixcell®; ROS; Triladyl®
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32216928 DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2020.106315
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Reprod Sci ISSN: 0378-4320 Impact factor: 2.145