Milim Kim1,2, Yul Ri Chung1,2, Hyun Jeong Kim1, Ji Won Woo1,2, Soomin Ahn1, So Yeon Park3,4. 1. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82, Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13620, Republic of Korea. sypmd@snu.ac.kr. 4. Department of Pathology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. sypmd@snu.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The immune microenvironment in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its significance are not well established. This study was conducted to evaluate the immune microenvironment of DCIS including the composition of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) subsets and PD-L1+ immune cells and to compare it with that of invasive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 671 cases including three different disease groups of pure DCIS, DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS-M), and invasive carcinoma were included in this study. CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ TIL subsets and PD-L1+ immune cells were detected with immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays and were analyzed in relation to clinicopathologic characteristics and different disease groups. RESULTS: In pure DCIS, high infiltrations of CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ T cells and the presence of PD-L1+ immune cells were associated with high nuclear grade, comedo-type necrosis, hormone receptor (HR) negativity, and high Ki-67 proliferation index. All immune cell infiltrations were higher in invasive carcinoma than in pure DCIS regardless of the HR status. While CD4+ T cells were more abundant than CD8+ T cells in pure DCIS, CD8+ T cells were dominant in invasive carcinoma, especially in HR-negative tumors. Within individual cases of invasive carcinoma with DCIS component, all immune cell subset infiltration was higher in the invasive component than in the DCIS component; however, CD4+ TIL infiltration did not differ between the two components in HR-negative tumors. Comparing pure DCIS, DCIS-M, and DCIS associated with invasive carcinoma (DCIS-INV), CD4+ TIL infiltration revealed a gradual increase from pure DCIS to DCIS-M and DCIS-INV in the HR-negative group, whereas FOXP3+ TIL infiltration was significantly increased in DCIS-INV than in pure DCIS in the HR-positive group. The high infiltration of FOXP3+ TIL and the presence of PD-L1+ immune cells were associated with tumor recurrence in patients with pure DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the immune microenvironment differs significantly not only between DCIS and invasive carcinoma but also between pure DCIS, DCIS-M, and DCIS-INV depending on the HR status.
BACKGROUND: The immune microenvironment in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its significance are not well established. This study was conducted to evaluate the immune microenvironment of DCIS including the composition of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) subsets and PD-L1+ immune cells and to compare it with that of invasive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 671 cases including three different disease groups of pure DCIS, DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS-M), and invasive carcinoma were included in this study. CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ TIL subsets and PD-L1+ immune cells were detected with immunohistochemistry using tissue microarrays and were analyzed in relation to clinicopathologic characteristics and different disease groups. RESULTS: In pure DCIS, high infiltrations of CD4+, CD8+, and FOXP3+ T cells and the presence of PD-L1+ immune cells were associated with high nuclear grade, comedo-type necrosis, hormone receptor (HR) negativity, and high Ki-67 proliferation index. All immune cell infiltrations were higher in invasive carcinoma than in pure DCIS regardless of the HR status. While CD4+ T cells were more abundant than CD8+ T cells in pure DCIS, CD8+ T cells were dominant in invasive carcinoma, especially in HR-negative tumors. Within individual cases of invasive carcinoma with DCIS component, all immune cell subset infiltration was higher in the invasive component than in the DCIS component; however, CD4+ TIL infiltration did not differ between the two components in HR-negative tumors. Comparing pure DCIS, DCIS-M, and DCIS associated with invasive carcinoma (DCIS-INV), CD4+ TIL infiltration revealed a gradual increase from pure DCIS to DCIS-M and DCIS-INV in the HR-negative group, whereas FOXP3+ TIL infiltration was significantly increased in DCIS-INV than in pure DCIS in the HR-positive group. The high infiltration of FOXP3+ TIL and the presence of PD-L1+ immune cells were associated with tumor recurrence in patients with pure DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the immune microenvironment differs significantly not only between DCIS and invasive carcinoma but also between pure DCIS, DCIS-M, and DCIS-INV depending on the HR status.
Authors: Carlos R Gil Del Alcazar; Anne Trinh; Maša Alečković; Ernesto Rojas Jimenez; Nicholas W Harper; Michael U J Oliphant; Shanshan Xie; Ethan D Krop; Bethlehem Lulseged; Katherine C Murphy; Tanya E Keenan; Eliezer M Van Allen; Sara M Tolaney; Gordon J Freeman; Deborah A Dillon; Senthil K Muthuswamy; Kornelia Polyak Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 12.020
Authors: Anne Trinh; Carlos R Gil Del Alcazar; Sachet A Shukla; Koei Chin; Young Hwan Chang; Guillaume Thibault; Jennifer Eng; Bojana Jovanović; C Marcelo Aldaz; So Yeon Park; Joon Jeong; Catherine Wu; Joe Gray; Kornelia Polyak Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 6.333
Authors: Debashish Sahay; Susan E Lloyd; Janelle A Rivera; Jacqueline Jezioro; Jacob D McDonald; Masha Pitiranggon; Beizhan Yan; Matthias Szabolcs; Mary Beth Terry; Rachel L Miller Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Ji Won Woo; Yul Ri Chung; Milim Kim; Hye Yeon Choi; Soomin Ahn; So Yeon Park Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2020-11-04 Impact factor: 6.968