Literature DB >> 32215859

Properties of a New Probiotic Candidate and Lactobacterin-TK2 Against Diarrhea in Calves.

Togzhan Boranbayeva1, Aynur Gül Karahan2, Zhanara Tulemissova1, Raya Myktybayeva3, Serkan Özkaya4.   

Abstract

Calf diarrhea is an important problem that can result in death and which leads to economic losses. Probiotics in the gastrointestinal tract can be effective for the prevention of diarrhea. In this study, some strains were isolated from traditional fermented dairy products (Shubat and Kumiss) and the feces of Holstein calves and heifers. Some probiotic properties were determined using a total of 124 isolates and Lactobacterin-TK2. Most of the isolates and Lactobacterin-TK2 were adversely affected by pH 2.0; however, they maintained their viability at pH 4.0 and 0.3% bile salt. The most effective antifungals on yeast strains were nystatin, voriconazole, and ketoconazole; however, they were resistant to itraconazole and amphotericin B. The majority of LAB strains and Lactobacterin-TK2 were susceptible to penicillin and tetracycline, whereas they were resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Bacillus spp. strains were susceptible to enrofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and gentamicin but resistant to penicillin. Also, 71% of lactobacilli have high hydrophobicity, whereas other strains have low hydrophobicity or had no hydrophobicity. Antagonistic properties of some selected strains against pathogenic bacteria were examined. All of the LABs inhibited at least one pathogen. The inhibitory effect of yeast strains on pathogens could not be determined. Then, five of the LAB strains were genotypically identified as Enterococcus faecium, one as Lactobacillus casei, and the yeast strains were identified as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Clavispora lusitaniae. L. casei K2 and S. cerevisiae S430b were selected as superior strains. These strains are capable of being used as a new probiotic candidate following in vivo trials.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid and bile tolerance; Adhesion; Antimicrobial activity; Pathogenic bacteria; Probiotics

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32215859     DOI: 10.1007/s12602-020-09649-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins        ISSN: 1867-1306            Impact factor:   4.609


  4 in total

1.  Characterization of Some Microorganisms from Human Stool Samples and Determination of Their Effects on CT26 Colorectal Carcinoma Cell Line.

Authors:  Münevver Kahraman; Aynur Gül Karahan; Mustafa Ender Terzioğlu
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Plasmid stability of potential probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains in artificial gastric juice, at elevated temperature, and in the presence of novobiocin and acriflavine.

Authors:  H Sağlam; A G Karahan
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 2.552

3.  Effects of Multispecies Probiotic on Intestinal Microbiota and Mucosal Barrier Function of Neonatal Calves Infected With E. coli K99.

Authors:  Yanyan Wu; Cunxi Nie; Ruiqing Luo; Fenghua Qi; Xue Bai; Hongli Chen; Junli Niu; Chen Chen; Wenju Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  In vitro investigation on lactic acid bacteria isolatedfrom Yak faeces for potential probiotics.

Authors:  Qingli Zhang; Meng Wang; Xin Ma; Zhijie Li; Chenghui Jiang; Yangyang Pan; Qiaoying Zeng
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 6.073

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.