Joana Gonçalves1,2, Gilberto Alves3, Andreia Carona1,2, Joana Bicker1,2, Carla Vitorino4,5, Amílcar Falcão1,2, Ana Fortuna6,7. 1. Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Pólo das Ciências da Saúde, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548, Coimbra, Portugal. 2. CIBIT/ICNAS - Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. 3. CICS-UBI - Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal. 4. Laboratory of Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. 5. Coimbra Chemistry Center, Department of Chemistry, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. 6. Laboratory of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Pólo das Ciências da Saúde, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548, Coimbra, Portugal. afortuna@ff.uc.pt. 7. CIBIT/ICNAS - Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal. afortuna@ff.uc.pt.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Zonisamide clinical indications are expanding beyond the classic treatment of epileptic seizures to Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. However, the systemic safety profile of zonisamide may compromise its use as a first-line drug in any clinical condition. Since zonisamide is marketed as oral formulations, the present study aimed at exploring the potential of the intranasal route to centrally administer zonisamide, evaluating the systemic bioavailability of zonisamide and comparing its brain, lung and kidney pharmacokinetics after intranasal, oral and intravenous administrations. METHODS: In vitro cell studies demonstrated that zonisamide and proposed thermoreversible gels did not affect the viability of RPMI 2650 or Calu-3 cells. Thereafter, male CD-1 mice were randomly administered with zonisamide by oral (80 mg/kg), intranasal or intravenous (16.7 mg/kg) route. At predefined time points, animals were sacrificed and plasma and tissues were collected to quantify zonisamide and describe its pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Intranasal route revealed a low absolute bioavailability (54.95%) but the highest value of the ratio between the area under the curve (AUC) between brain and plasma, suggesting lower systemic adverse events and non-inferior effects in central nervous system comparatively to intravenous and oral routes. Furthermore, drug targeting efficiency and direct transport percentage into the brain were 149.54% and 33.13%, respectively, corroborating that a significant fraction of zonisamide suffers direct nose-to-brain transport. Lung and kidney exposures obtained after intranasal administration were lower than those observed after intravenous injection. CONCLUSIONS: This pre-clinical investigation demonstrates a direct nose-to-brain delivery of zonisamide, which may be a promising strategy for the treatment of central diseases.
PURPOSE:Zonisamide clinical indications are expanding beyond the classic treatment of epileptic seizures to Parkinson's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. However, the systemic safety profile of zonisamide may compromise its use as a first-line drug in any clinical condition. Since zonisamide is marketed as oral formulations, the present study aimed at exploring the potential of the intranasal route to centrally administer zonisamide, evaluating the systemic bioavailability of zonisamide and comparing its brain, lung and kidney pharmacokinetics after intranasal, oral and intravenous administrations. METHODS: In vitro cell studies demonstrated that zonisamide and proposed thermoreversible gels did not affect the viability of RPMI 2650 or Calu-3 cells. Thereafter, male CD-1mice were randomly administered with zonisamide by oral (80 mg/kg), intranasal or intravenous (16.7 mg/kg) route. At predefined time points, animals were sacrificed and plasma and tissues were collected to quantify zonisamide and describe its pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Intranasal route revealed a low absolute bioavailability (54.95%) but the highest value of the ratio between the area under the curve (AUC) between brain and plasma, suggesting lower systemic adverse events and non-inferior effects in central nervous system comparatively to intravenous and oral routes. Furthermore, drug targeting efficiency and direct transport percentage into the brain were 149.54% and 33.13%, respectively, corroborating that a significant fraction of zonisamide suffers direct nose-to-brain transport. Lung and kidney exposures obtained after intranasal administration were lower than those observed after intravenous injection. CONCLUSIONS: This pre-clinical investigation demonstrates a direct nose-to-brain delivery of zonisamide, which may be a promising strategy for the treatment of central diseases.