| Literature DB >> 32215296 |
Changjiang Li1, Aiqi Cai1, Congcong Sun1, Benyuan Wu1, Xinpei Chen1, Yanhua Mao1, Yingfeng Zhang1, Yating Gou1, Jie Yu1, Yuhan Wang1, Huanhuan Yu1, Jia Wang1.
Abstract
Transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA) is the standard treatment for the intrauterine adhesions, but the recurrence of adhesions is a tough problem for the gynecologist. In addition, the therapeutic strategy after TCRA about prevention of recurrence remains controversial especially for the patients with moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions (IUAs). Hence, we designed this study to explore the safety and efficacy of fresh amnion grafts for preventing the recurrence after TCRA for patients with moderate to severe IUAs. One hundred patients with moderate to severe IUAs who presented with a history of hypomenorrhea, amenorrhea and infertility were included in the study from January 2015 to December 2017. Patients were divided into amnion group (52 patients) and chitosan group (48 patients). Fresh amnion grafts or intrauterine injections of chitosan were administered after TCRA. Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS) and hysteroscopy were performed at the first and third month after the operation. The surgical procedures for all patients were completed successfully without relevant complications. In amnion group, 8 patients exhibited relapse in the first month and 2 patients in three months after surgery; in chitosan group, 23 women exhibited relapse in the first month and 18 patients in three months after surgery. Statistical analysis revealed that the recurrence rate of adhesion in amnion group was significantly lower than those of chitosan group in the first and three months after surgery (P 1 = 0.000, P 2 = 0.000). After TCRA, fresh amnion graft plays a significant role in preventing further adhesions than injections of chitosan.Entities:
Keywords: Amnion graft; Asherman's syndrome; Intrauterine adhesions; Recurrence of adhesion; Transcervical resection of adhesion
Year: 2019 PMID: 32215296 PMCID: PMC7083730 DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2019.03.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genes Dis ISSN: 2352-3042
The general situation of the patients in the two groups ( ± s).
| Index | Amnion group | Chitosan group | The value of | The value of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 52 | 48 | ||
| Age | 29.04 ± 2.76 | 29.02 ± 3.10 | 0.030 | 0.976 |
| Number of pregnancies | 3.33 ± 0.47 | 3.35 ± 0.48 | −0.285 | 0.777 |
The comparison of the possible etiological distribution of patients with intrauterine adhesions between the two groups (%).
| Grouping | Artificial abortion (%) | Residue placenta (%) | Cesarean section (%) | Inflammation (%) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amnion group | 35 (67.3%) | 2 (3.8%) | 6 (11.5%) | 9 (17.3%) | 52 |
| Chitosan group | 34 (70.8%) | 2 (4.2%) | 5 (10.2%) | 7 (14.6%) | 48 |
| Total | 59 | 4 | 11 | 26 | 100 |
| The value of | 0.382 | ||||
| The value of | 0.980 | ||||
The average of the endometrial thickness before and after surgery in the two groups ( ± s).
| Index | Amnion group | Chitosan group | The value of | The value of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |||
| Endometrial thickness (mm) | ||||
| Preoperative | 3.12 ± 0.78 | 3.25 ± 0.96 | −0.772 | 0.442 |
| First month after surgery | 7.08 ± 0.76 | 6.50 ± 0.71 | 3.894 | 0.000 |
The comparison of the recurrence rate of adhesion in the first month after surgery in the two groups (%).
| Grouping | No adhesion (%) | Adhesion recurrence (%) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amnion group | 44 (84.6%) | 8 (15.4%) | 52 |
| Chitosan group | 25 (52.1%) | 23 (47.9%) | 48 |
| Total | 79 | 31 | 100 |
| The value of | 12.350 | ||
| The value of | 0.000 | ||
The comparison of the recurrence rate of adhesion in three months after surgery in the two groups (%).
| Grouping | No adhesion (%) | Adhesion recurrence (%) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amnion group | 50 (96.2%) | 2 (3.8%) | 52 |
| Chitosan group | 30 (62.5%) | 18 (37.5%) | 48 |
| Total | 80 | 20 | 100 |
| The value of | 17.88 | ||
| The value | 0.000 | ||
Figure 1One Woman with Severe Intrauterine Adhesions. (a) Preoperative: adhesions and scarring had obliterated the uterine cavity. (b) Postoperative: restoration of the uterine cavity, with bilateral fallopian tubes visible. (c) One month after surgery: the uterine cavity had a normal shape and size, with no adhesions, and bilateral fallopian tubes were visible; residual amnion can be seen in the cavity (indicated by the arrow in the picture).