| Literature DB >> 32215021 |
Sweta Kamalkant Shastri1, Archana Joshi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &Entities:
Keywords: Fine needle aspiration cytology; Intra-abdominal lesions; Modified Ultrafast Papanicolaou Stain; Papanicolaou Stain; Quality Index
Year: 2020 PMID: 32215021 PMCID: PMC7081759 DOI: 10.30699/ijp.2020.98405.1971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pathol ISSN: 1735-5303
Comparing the Modified Ultrafast Papanicolaou (MUFP) and Papanicolaou (PAP) staining on the basis of staining steps and procedure time
| MUFP | Routine PAP |
|---|---|
| Staining Procedure | |
| Air Dried smears kept in Normal saline for 30 sec and then in alcoholic formalin for 10 sec. | Smears wet fixed for 30 min 70% ethanol – 1min, 50% ethanol –1min |
| Tap water 6 slow dips | Distilled water 6 dips |
| Hematoxylin 30 second | Harris Haematoxylin 5 minutes |
| Tap water 6 slow dips | Rinse in tap water for 2 minutes |
| Isopropyl alcohol 95% 6 dips | Rinse in Scott’s tap water for 2 minutes |
| Eosin Alcohol-36 (EA 36) for 15 seconds | Rinse in tap water for 2 minutes |
| Isopropyl alcohol 95% 6 dips | Ethanol 70% for 2 minutes |
| Isopropyl alcohol 100% 6 dips | Ethanol 95% for 2 minutes |
| Xylene 10 slow dips | Ethanol 95% for 2 minutes |
| Distyrene Plasticizer Xylene (DPX) | OG-6 for 2 minutes |
| Mount with cover slip | Rinse in 95% Ethanol two changes 2 minutes each |
| EA 50 for 2 minutes | |
| Rinse in 95% Ethanol for 1 minute | |
| Air dry | |
| Xylene minutes | |
| DPX and mount with cover slip | |
| Procedure time | |
| Total staining time-130 secs | Total staining time-15 mins |
Fig. 1Distribution of cases according to age and gender
Fig. 2Distribution of cases according to different organs involved in the study population
Fig. 3Distribution of nature of cases according to cytological diagnosis
Fig. 4Comparison of MUFP and PAP cytology staining for serous papillary cystadenocarcinoma ovary showing clusters of round to oval cells with hyperchromatic nuclei, moderate anisonucleosis and pleomorphism
Fig. 5Comparison of MUFP and PAP cytology staining for round cell tumor (intra-abdominal mass unknown origin); (a) Haemorrhagic background with moderately preserved cell morphology, dull nuclear characteristics, and overall moderately good staining pattern (PAP 40x); (b) Clean background with well-preserved cell morphology, crisp nuclear characteristics, and overall good staining pattern (MUFP 40x)
Fig. 6Comparison of MUFP and PAP cytology staining of aspirate from retroperitoneal mass showing spindle cell tumor (a) Haemorrhagic background with moderately preserved cell morphology, dull nuclear characteristics, and overall moderately good staining pattern (PAP 40x) (b) Clean background with well-preserved cell morphology, crisp nuclear characteristics, and overall good staining pattern (MUFP 40x)
Table showing various characteristic of the stain used for comparing Modified Ultrafast Papanicolaou (MUFP) and Papanicolaou (PAP) stain
| Characteristic of the stain | MUFP Stain n (%) | PAP Stain n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Background | ||
| Clean (Score 2) | 100(100) | 37(37) |
| Haemorrhagic (Score 1) | 0(0) | 63(63) |
| Overall Staining | ||
| Good (Score 3) | 70(70) | 50(50) |
| Moderate (Score 2) | 30(30) | 50(50) |
| Bad (Score 1) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Cell Morphology | ||
| Good (Score 3) | 96(96) | 89(89) |
| Moderate (Score 2) | 4(4) | 11(11) |
| Bad (Score 1) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
| Nuclear Characteristic | ||
| Good (Score 3) | 91(91) | 78(78) |
| Moderate (Score 2) | 9(9) | 22(22) |
| Bad (Score 1) | 0(0) | 0(0) |
Score 1 = Haemorrhagic background, Overall staining bad, Cell morphology not preserved, Nuclear details not preserved; Score 2 = Clean background, Overall staining moderately good, Cell morphology moderately preserved, Nuclear details moderately preserved; Score 3 = Good overall staining, Cell morphology well preserved and crisp, Nuclear details well preserved and crisp
Table showing comparison of different staining parameters that are used to study Modified Ultrafast Papanicolaou (MUFP) and Papanicolaou (PAP) stain
| Characteristic | MUFP STAIN (Mean ± SD) | PAP STAIN (Mean ± SD) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background of smears | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 1.37± 0.48 | 0.00 |
| Staining pattern | 2.68 ± 0.47 | 2.50 ± 0.50 | 0.00 |
| Cell morphology | 2.95± 0.22 | 2.85± 0.31 | 0.11 |
| Nuclear staining | 2.91 ± 0.28 | 2.78± 0.42 | 0.01 |
| Cumulative score | 10.53± 0.52 | 9.58± 0.62 | 0.00 |
| Total score of study population (maximum score – 1100) | 1053 | 958 | 0.00 |
| Quality index | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.00 |
Cytohistopathological correlation and diagnostic accuracy of various lesions
| Lesion | Cytological diagnosis | Histological diagnosis available | Correlation of cytological and histological diagnosis | Diagnostic accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malignant | 68 | 30 | 30 | 100 |
| Benign | 20 | 15 | 12 | 80 |
| Inflammatory | 12 | - | - | |
| Overall | 93.33 |