| Literature DB >> 32214871 |
Abstract
The primary vector of the dengue fever virus, the Aedes aegypti mosquito, is distributed across the tropical and sub-tropical latitudes; however, the area at risk of infection has been expanding steadily. This study aimed to identify the industries most vulnerable to the effects of dengue fever by 2030. The assessment was done by considering the international supply chain, with aspects such as the labor intensity, and the relevant geographical and socioeconomic aspects being taken into account. In addition, multi-regional input-output tables were employed to analyze the ripple effects of productivity losses resulting from workers contracting the disease. The results indicate that more than 10% of the workers involved in the supply chain of all the major industries in the United States (USA), China, Japan, and Germany could be considered at risk of contracting dengue fever by 2030. Moreover, the risk was even higher in India and Brazil, namely, more than 70%. The effect of widespread dengue fever infection could influence industrial activities severely, not only in the regions most at risk (India and Brazil) but also in the other regions (USA, Japan, and Germany). Labor-intensive industries, such as agriculture, fisheries, and the distribution sector are particularly at risk and will have to consider appropriate contingency measures. It is recommended that the downstream side of the supply chain, the industries in the USA, Japan, and Germany, supports the introduction of worker's health management system against the infectious disease into their business partners. This study employed limited data and only estimated the possible effects of the disease by 2030. Further comprehensive analysis is required with more data modeled for the future to verify and enhance the reliability of the present results. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptation; Climate change; Dengue fever; Infectious disease; Input-output analysis; Labor risks; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Productivity; Supply chain; Trade
Year: 2017 PMID: 32214871 PMCID: PMC7089289 DOI: 10.1007/s11027-017-9741-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang ISSN: 1381-2386 Impact factor: 3.583
Fig. 1Assessment procedure to calculate the future risk of dengue infection to industry through the global supply chain
Percentage of population at risk of dengue infection in 2030 relevant to climate and socioeconomic changes
| Region | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Asia Pacific, high income | 0.35 |
| Asia, central | 0.22 |
| Asia, east | 26.5 |
| Asia, south | 73.2 |
| Asia, southeast | 91.6 |
| Australasia | 0.03 |
| Caribbean | 83.4 |
| Europe, central | 0.00 |
| Europe, eastern | 0.00 |
| Europe, western | 0.00 |
| Latin America, Andean | 22.9 |
| Latin America, central | 56.6 |
| Latin America, southern | 5.8 |
| Latin America, tropical | 98.9 |
| North America, high income | 0.01 |
| North Africa/Middle East | 0.87 |
| Oceania | 54.1 |
| Sub-Saharan Africa, central | 73.5 |
| Sub-Saharan Africa, eastern | 57.8 |
| Sub-Saharan Africa, southern | 14.3 |
| Sub-Saharan Africa, western | 61.1 |
Proportion of workers at risk of contracting dengue virus infection in major countries and industrial sectors
| Economic sector | Industry | USA (%) | China (%) | Japan (%) | Germany (%) | India (%) | Brazil (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Fish products | 63 | 29 | 42 | 41 | 73 | 97 |
| Secondary | |||||||
| Food | Food products | 30 | 27 | 26 | 44 | 73 | 93 |
| Material | Textiles | 28 | 36 | 25 | 40 | 73 | 89 |
| Plastics | 32 | 34 | 37 | 38 | 71 | 80 | |
| Chemicals | 28 | 34 | 37 | 31 | 71 | 85 | |
| Iron and steel | 20 | 30 | 24 | 29 | 71 | 88 | |
| Manufacturing | Motor vehicles | 23 | 28 | 20 | 23 | 72 | 86 |
| Other | Construction | 12 | 28 | 13 | 15 | 72 | 96 |
| Tertiary | Hotels and restaurants | 16 | 28 | 18 | 19 | 73 | 97 |
Proportion of indirect effects of dengue fever risk on major countries and industrial sectors
| USA (%) | China (%) | Japan (%) | Germany (%) | India (%) | Brazil (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fish products | >99 | 96 | >99 | 100 | 95 | 96 |
| Food products | >99 | 89 | >99 | 100 | 89 | 88 |
| Textiles | >99 | 87 | >99 | 100 | 56 | 49 |
| Plastics | >99 | 89 | >99 | 100 | 83 | 82 |
| Chemicals | >99 | 90 | >99 | 100 | 82 | 73 |
| Iron and steel | >99 | 71 | >99 | 100 | 74 | 78 |
| Motor vehicles | >99 | 63 | >99 | 100 | 76 | 76 |
| Construction | >99 | 62 | 99 | 100 | 43 | 29 |
| Hotels and restaurants | >99 | 71 | 99 | 100 | 75 | 35 |
Fig. 2Relation between number of workers at risk of contracting dengue fever and production value per country
Major contributing industry to the risk of dengue infection in workers in the supply chain
| Industry sector and country | Direct impact (%) | Major contributing industry in supply chain as an indirect impact | Labor intensity of major contributing industry (workers/m EUR)a |
|---|---|---|---|
| (a) Fish product sector in the USA | <1 | Fish in Asia-Pacific countries | 2841 |
| (b) Textiles in China | 13 | Plant-based fibers in Asia-Pacific countries | 762 |
| (c) Food products in China | 11 | Vegetables in China | 530 |
| (d) Hotels and restaurants in Japan | 1 | Fish in Asia-Pacific countries | 2841 |
| (e) Motor vehicles in Germany | 0 | None | – |
| (f) Plastics in Germany | 0 | None | – |
| (g) Iron and steel in India | 26 | Iron and steel in India | 43 |
| (h) Construction in India | 57 | Construction in India | 223 |
| (i) Chemicals in Brazil | 27 | Chemicals in Brazil | 29 |
aAdopted from Wood et al. (2015)
Fig. 3Proportions of estimated dengue fever risk through supply chain to major industry sectors in 2030