Literature DB >> 32214627

Assessment the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection masks against viral aerosol.

ZhanBo Wen1, Long Yu1, WenHui Yang1, LingFei Hu1, Na Li1, Jie Wang1, JinSong Li1, JianChun Lu1, XiaoKai Dong1, Zhe Yin1, Ke Zhang1.   

Abstract

New viral disease such as SARS and H1N1 highlighted the vulnerability of healthcare workers to aerosol-transmitted viral infections. This paper was to assess the protection performance of different level personal respiratory protection equipments against viral aerosol. Surgical masks, N95 masks and N99 masks were purchased from the market. The masks were sealed onto the manikin in the aerosol testing chamber. Viral aerosol was generated and then sampled simultaneously before and after the tested mask using biosamplers. This allows a percentage efficiency value to be calculated against test phage SM702 aerosols which surrogates of viral pathogens aerosol. At the same time, the masks face fit factor was determined by TSI8020. The viral aerosol particles aerodynamic diameter was 0.744 μm, and GSD was 1.29. The protection performance of the material of all the tested masks against viral aerosol was all >95 %. All the five surgical masks face fit factor were <8. F model N95 mask and H model N99 mask face fit factor were all >160. G model N95 mask face fit factor was 8.2. The protection performances of N95 or N99 masks were many times higher than surgical mask when considering the face fit factor. Surgical masks cannot offer sufficient protection against the inhalation of viral aerosol because they cannot provide a close face seal. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Personal respiratory protection equipments; Protection efficiency; Viral aerosol

Year:  2012        PMID: 32214627      PMCID: PMC7087618          DOI: 10.1007/s10453-012-9286-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aerobiologia (Bologna)        ISSN: 0393-5965            Impact factor:   2.410


  8 in total

Review 1.  Role of respirators in controlling the spread of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) amongst dental healthcare providers: a review.

Authors:  F Umer; Z Haji; K Zafar
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.264

2.  Meltblown fabric vs nanofiber membrane, which is better for fabricating personal protective equipments.

Authors:  Junwei Wu; Hongjia Zhou; Jingyi Zhou; Xiao Zhu; Bowen Zhang; Shasha Feng; Zhaoxiang Zhong; Lingxue Kong; Weihong Xing
Journal:  Chin J Chem Eng       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.171

Review 3.  What We Are Learning from COVID-19 for Respiratory Protection: Contemporary and Emerging Issues.

Authors:  Rui Li; Mengying Zhang; Yulin Wu; Peixin Tang; Gang Sun; Liwen Wang; Sumit Mandal; Lizhi Wang; James Lang; Alberto Passalacqua; Shankar Subramaniam; Guowen Song
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 4.  Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes for Controlling Airborne Viruses: Present Status, Standardization of Aerosol Filtration Tests, and Future Development.

Authors:  Hongchen Shen; Minghao Han; Yun Shen; Danmeng Shuai
Journal:  ACS Environ Au       Date:  2022-03-11

5.  Air contamination with SARS-CoV-2 in the operating room.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Hirota
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 6.  Facial protection for healthcare workers during pandemics: a scoping review.

Authors:  Laura R Garcia Godoy; Amy E Jones; Taylor N Anderson; Cameron L Fisher; Kylie M L Seeley; Erynn A Beeson; Hannah K Zane; Jaime W Peterson; Peter D Sullivan
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2020-05

Review 7.  SARS-CoV-2 and Health Care Worker Protection in Low-Risk Settings: a Review of Modes of Transmission and a Novel Airborne Model Involving Inhalable Particles.

Authors:  X Sophie Zhang; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  All India Ophthalmological Society - Oculoplastics Association of India consensus statement on preferred practices in oculoplasty and lacrimal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Mohammad Javed Ali; Raghuraj Hegde; Akshay Gopinathan Nair; Mandeep S Bajaj; Subhash M Betharia; Kasturi Bhattacharjee; Apjit K Chhabra; Jayanta K Das; Gagan Dudeja; Ashok K Grover; Santosh G Honavar; Usha Kim; Lakshmi Mahesh; Bipasha Mukherjee; Anita Sethi; Mukesh Sharma; Usha Singh
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.848

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.