Literature DB >> 32214626

Determining the filtration efficiency of half-face medical protection mask (N99) against viral aerosol.

ZhanBo Wen1, JianChun Lu1, JinSong Li1, Na Li1, JianJun Zhao1, Jie Wang1, Long Yu1, WenHui Yang1.   

Abstract

Hospital-based outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) have once again highlighted the vulnerability of healthcare workers (HCWs). Use of personal respiratory protective equipment was the main method used by HCWs to avoid nosocomial transmission. This paper describes the technology used to evaluate the filtration efficiency of the half-face medical protection mask (N99), manufactured by Firmshield Biotechnology, against viral aerosol. Viral aerosol was generated and then sampled simultaneously with and without the test mask. This enables a percentage efficiency value to be calculated against test phage f2 aerosols (surrogates of viral pathogen aerosols). At the same time the mask filtration efficiency against NaCl particle aerosol was determined by use of TSI8130 equipment and face-fit factor was tested by use of TSI8020 equipment. The half-face medical protection mask (N99) evaluated by use of the viral aerosol had a filtration efficiency >99%. The mask filtration efficiency against NaCl particle aerosol was 99.634 ± 0.024% and it had a good face-fit factor. This half-face medical protection mask (N99) can protect the wearer from viral aerosol disease transmission. The test method can be used to assess filtration efficacy against viral aerosol of masks used for respiratory protection. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Filtration efficiency; Half-face medical protection mask; Nosocomial transmission; Viral aerosol

Year:  2010        PMID: 32214626      PMCID: PMC7087622          DOI: 10.1007/s10453-010-9160-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aerobiologia (Bologna)        ISSN: 0393-5965            Impact factor:   2.410


  6 in total

Review 1.  Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Chris B Del Mar; Liz Dooley; Eliana Ferroni; Lubna A Al-Ansary; Ghada A Bawazeer; Mieke L van Driel; Sreekumaran Nair; Mark A Jones; Sarah Thorning; John M Conly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

2.  Meltblown fabric vs nanofiber membrane, which is better for fabricating personal protective equipments.

Authors:  Junwei Wu; Hongjia Zhou; Jingyi Zhou; Xiao Zhu; Bowen Zhang; Shasha Feng; Zhaoxiang Zhong; Lingxue Kong; Weihong Xing
Journal:  Chin J Chem Eng       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.171

Review 3.  Assessment of cloth masks ability to limit Covid-19 particles spread: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mahshid Ataei; Farshad M Shirazi; Samaneh Nakhaee; Mohammad Abdollahi; Omid Mehrpour
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Investigation of the impact of SARS-CoV infection on the immunologic status and lung function after 15 years.

Authors:  Jia Li; Yali Zheng; Yusen Zhou; Lili Zhao; Zhihong Yue; Feng Pan; Yuehong Chen; Bing Yu; Yanwen Chen; Guangyu Zhao; Zhancheng Gao
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.090

5.  Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Chris B Del Mar; Liz Dooley; Eliana Ferroni; Lubna A Al-Ansary; Ghada A Bawazeer; Mieke L van Driel; Mark A Jones; Sarah Thorning; Elaine M Beller; Justin Clark; Tammy C Hoffmann; Paul P Glasziou; John M Conly
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-11-20

6.  Face mask fit hacks: Improving the fit of KN95 masks and surgical masks with fit alteration techniques.

Authors:  Eugenia O'Kelly; Anmol Arora; Sophia Pirog; Charlotte Pearson; James Ward; P John Clarkson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.