Literature DB >> 32214442

The SUP-ICU Trial: Does It Confirm or Condemn the Practice of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis?

Jeffrey F Barletta1, Mitchell S Buckley2, Robert MacLaren3.   

Abstract

Purpose: Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) is routinely administered to critically ill patients for the prevention of stress ulcer-induced, clinically important bleeding (CIB). Recently, the value of SUP has been questioned due to the perceived decline in CIB and the potential for infectious complications secondary to acid suppressive therapy. The SUP-ICU trial is a large, randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous pantoprazole with placebo for the indication of SUP. It is hoped that this trial would answer many of the questions pertaining to the overall value of SUP. This article will provide an in-depth assessment of the SUP-ICU trial in the context of the overall body of literature in this area. Furthermore, applications for clinical practice and recommendations on the provision of SUP are provided. Summary: The SUP-ICU trial revealed no difference in the primary outcome of 90-day mortality with pantoprazole but lower rates of CIB were noted (which was a secondary outcome). Overall, these data provide important insight into the value of SUP along with other questions related to the provision of SUP such as the relationship between CIB and mortality, infectious complications, and enteral nutrition. Conclusions: The SUP-ICU trial is a landmark trial describing the value of SUP in a modern-day setting of intensive care unit (ICU) practice. The provision of SUP should be continued in high-risk patients. Future studies are ongoing that will add further insight to this routine practice.
© The Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical care; gastrointestinal hemorrhage; pantoprazole; stress ulcer prophylaxis

Year:  2019        PMID: 32214442      PMCID: PMC7081478          DOI: 10.1177/0018578719867687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Pharm        ISSN: 0018-5787


  38 in total

1.  Pantoprazole or Placebo for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis (POP-UP): Randomized Double-Blind Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Shane P Selvanderan; Matthew J Summers; Mark E Finnis; Mark P Plummer; Yasmine Ali Abdelhamid; Michael B Anderson; Marianne J Chapman; Christopher K Rayner; Adam M Deane
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis: stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors, H2 receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Viviane Adam; Myriam Martel; Marc Bardou
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

3.  A survey of prescriber perceptions about the prevention of stress-related mucosal bleeding in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  C R Preslaski; S W Mueller; T H Kiser; D N Fish; R MacLaren
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of Histamine2 Receptor Antagonists Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Drayton A Hammond; Niranjan Kathe; Anuj Shah; Bradley C Martin
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  Cost-effectiveness of histamine receptor-2 antagonist versus proton pump inhibitor for stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients*.

Authors:  Robert MacLaren; Jon Campbell
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Pharmacoepidemiology of stress ulcer prophylaxis in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  Jeffrey F Barletta; Salmaan Kanji; Robert MacLaren; Ishaq Lat; Brian L Erstad
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.425

7.  Inappropriate continuation of stress ulcer prophylaxis beyond the intensive care setting.

Authors:  K J Farley; Kerryn L Barned; Tim M Crozier
Journal:  Crit Care Resusc       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.159

8.  Prospective evaluation of the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after admission to a medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  D P Schuster; H Rowley; S Feinstein; M K McGue; G R Zuckerman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Re-evaluating the Utility of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Critically Ill Patient: A Clinical Scenario-Based Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Paul M Reynolds; Robert MacLaren
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.705

10.  The attributable mortality and length of intensive care unit stay of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients.

Authors:  D J Cook; L E Griffith; S D Walter; G H Guyatt; M O Meade; D K Heyland; A Kirby; M Tryba
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  1 in total

1.  Heterogeneity of treatment effect of prophylactic pantoprazole in adult ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of the SUP-ICU trial.

Authors:  Anders Granholm; Søren Marker; Mette Krag; Fernando G Zampieri; Hans-Christian Thorsen-Meyer; Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen; Iwan C C van der Horst; Theis Lange; Jørn Wetterslev; Anders Perner; Morten Hylander Møller
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 17.440

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.