| Literature DB >> 32214130 |
Valeria Di Dato1, Roberta Barbarinaldi2, Alberto Amato3, Federica Di Costanzo2, Carolina Fontanarosa4, Anna Perna2, Angela Amoresano4, Francesco Esposito2, Adele Cutignano5, Adrianna Ianora2, Giovanna Romano2.
Abstract
Prostaglandins (PGs) are hormone-like mediators in many physiological and pathological processes that are present in all vertebrates, in some terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates, and have also been identified in some macroalgae. They have recently been reported also in marine microalgae but their role as chemical mediators is largely unknown. Here we studied the expression pattern of the PG biosynthetic pathway during different growth phases of the centric diatom Thalassiosira rotula and assessed the release of PGs in the surrounding environment for the first time. We show that enzymes responsible for PGs formation such as cyclooxygenase, prostaglandin E synthase 2-like and prostaglandin F synthase are mainly expressed at the end of the exponential phase and that PGs are released especially during the stationary and senescent phases, suggesting a possible signaling function for these compounds. Phylogenetic analysis of the limiting enzyme, COX, indicate the presence in diatoms of more than one enzyme related to the oxidative metabolism of fatty acids belonging to the peroxidase-cyclooxygenase superfamily. These findings suggest a more complex evolution and diversity of metabolic pathways leading to the synthesis of lipid mediators in diatoms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32214130 PMCID: PMC7096440 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61967-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Results of multi alignments of TrotCOX protein sequences with available protein structures.
| Template | Template id/DOI/web link | Alignment Coverage | Confidence | % of identity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buffalo lactoperoxidase | c2gjmA 10.2210/pdb2GJM/pdb | 97 | 100 | 19 |
| Sheep prostaglandin g/h synthase 1 | c2oyup 10.2210/pdb2OYU/pdb | 99 | 100 | 28 |
| Sheep prostaglandin g/h synthase 1 | c1pggB 10.2210/pdb1PGG/pdb | 99 | 100 | 28 |
| Sheep prostaglandin g/h synthase 1 | c1ht8B 10.2210/pdb1HT8/pdb | 99 | 100 | 28 |
| Sheep prostaglandin g/h synthase 2 | d1q4ga1 | 99 | 100 | 28 |
Peroxidase | c6ercA 10.2210/pdb6ERC/pdb | 97 | 100 | 26 |
| human promyeloperoxidase | c5mfaA 10.2210/pdb5MFA/pdb | 97 | 100 | 20 |
Mouse Cycloxygenase 2 | c1ddxA 10.2210/pdb1DDX/pdb | 99 | 100 | 27 |
Mouse Cycloxygenase 2 | c3pghD 10.2210/pdb3PGH/pdb | 99 | 100 | 27 |
Mouse Cycloxygenase 2 | d1cvua1 | 99 | 100 | 27 |
Human Myeloperoxidase isoform C | c1d2vD 10.2210/pdb1D2V/pdb | 94 | 100 | 20 |
| Arabidopsis fatty acid alpha-dioxygenase (arabidopsis2 thaliana) | c4hhsA 10.2210/pdb4HHS/pdb | 98 | 100 | 19 |
c4kvjA 10.2210/pdb4KVJ/pdb | 99 | 100 | 19 |
Refer to Supplementary Table 1 for a complete list.
Figure 1In silico reconstruction of the TrotCOX protein structure compared with the known reference proteins for the peroxidase-cyclooxygenase superfamily. (a) TrotCOX structure based on the 2.75 Å resolved x-ray diffraction of BtLPO. (b) Comparison of the in silico structure of the TrotCOX protein and the 2.75 Å resolved x-ray diffraction of BtLPO showing the perfect overlap of the alpha-helices embedding the heme sides. In blue the TrotCOX, in light green the BtLPO. (c) Comparison of the in silico structure of the TrotCOX protein and the 2.75 Å resolved x-ray diffraction of OaCOX1 showing the perfect overlap of the alpha-helices embedding the heme sides. Rainbow colored helices correspond to TrotCOX, the light-blue colored helices correspond to OaCOX1. (d) Illustration of the conserved catalytic sites described in the text. Q, R, D and L278 black letters refer to the conserved amino acids of the two distal heme sides with L278 being the mutated original E. Pink and light red letters indicate the conserved amino acids in the two proximal heme sides. The red letters indicate the amino acids forming the calcium binding site.
Figure 2TrotCOX vs BtLPO amino acid sequence alignment at the distal and proximal heme sides and at the calcium binding sites[32]. The sequence Logo of the same portion of the alignment for the diatom specific clade is shown below. The sequence Logo is a resumed representation of an alignment among two or more sequences. The height of each letter is proportional to its frequency and the most common one is placed on the top[55]. Important amino acidic residues reported in the text are indicated on the T. rotula sequence. BtLPO = Bos taurus LPO; T. rot = Thalassiosira rotula.
Figure 3Phylogenetic analysis of the Thalassiosira rotula COX. Diatom sequences are scattered in the ML phylogenetic tree, either in diatom specific clades, or clustered together with sequences from other taxa. Legend: TrotCOX is indicated in red; cyan dot: diatom sequences not clustering the diatoms-specific clade; cyan-shaded clade: diatom specific clade; 5a: 5a-family in the diatom/bacterial clade; 4 COX: animal COX clade (family 4, cyclooxygenases); 4 α-DOX: plant α-DOX proteins (family 4, cyclooxygenases); 5b: 5b-family cyanobacteria. The nomenclature used for the family classification follows Zámocký et al.[12].
Figure 4Gene expression analysis of the three genes identified in the Thalassiosira rotula prostaglandin pathway. Expression levels of COX (a), mPTGES (b) and PTGFS (c) genes during the growth of T. rotula from day 3 to day 10. Results are based on TBP housekeeping gene normalized value. Normalization based on Actin as housekeeping gene gave the same results. Panels a, b and c report the corresponding growth phase (Abbreviations: Exp.: Exponential phase; Stat.: Stationary phase). Y axis reports the Mean Normalized Expression (MNE) of three biological and technical replicates using TBP as reference gene. Letters on bars refer to significant daily comparisons. Refer to Table 2 for the levels of significance and the corresponding comparisons. (d) Growth curves of the 3 independent T. rotula cultures utilized to analyze gene expression. Horizontal lines over the symbols indicate the mean value of the three values for each time point. Y axis is in logarithmic scale.
One-way ANOVA analysis over the time points along the 10 day T. rotula growth curve showing day by day comparisons for each gene with the corresponding significance.
| Tukey’s multiple comparisons test | Adjusted p-value | Significant | Reference symbol in Fig. | Adjusted p-value | Significant | Reference symbol in Fig. | Adjusted p-value | Significant | Reference symbol in Fig. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| gene | COX | mPTGES | PTGFS | |||||||
| ANOVA P value | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | <0.0001 | |||||||
| Day3 vs Day4 | 0,8823 | ns | 0,0412 | * | h | <0,0001 | **** | p | ||
| Day3 vs Day5 | 0,0005 | *** | a | 0,4826 | ns | 0,9745 | ns | |||
| Day3 vs Day6 | 0,1282 | ns | 0,0247 | * | i | 0,1358 | ns | |||
| Day3 vs Day7 | 0,9720 | ns | 0,0298 | * | j | 0,0079 | ** | q | ||
| Day3 vs Day10 | 0,8710 | ns | 0,0328 | * | k | 0,0038 | ** | r | ||
| Day4 vs Day5 | 0,0007 | *** | b | 0,0056 | ** | l | <0,0001 | **** | s | |
| Day4 vs Day6 | 0,3705 | ns | 0,0003 | *** | m | <0,0001 | **** | t | ||
| Day4 vs Day7 | 0,4802 | ns | 0,0005 | *** | n | <0,0001 | **** | u | ||
| Day4 vs Day10 | 0,3069 | ns | 0,0005 | *** | o | <0,0001 | **** | v | ||
| Day5 vs Day6 | 0,0053 | ** | c | 0,5259 | ns | 0,3359 | ns | |||
| Day5 vs Day7 | 0,0003 | *** | d | 0,4658 | ns | 0,0207 | * | w | ||
| Day5 vs Day10 | 0,0002 | *** | e | 0,4979 | ns | 0,0094 | ** | x | ||
| Day6 vs Day7 | 0,0442 | * | f | 0,9996 | ns | 0,4457 | ns | |||
| Day6 vs Day10 | 0,0263 | * | g | 0,9999 | ns | 0,2070 | ns | |||
| Day7 vs Day10 | 0,9988 | ns | >0,9999 | ns | 0,9740 | ns | ||||
Abbreviations: ns: not significant; *adjusted p-value < 0.05; **adjusted p-value < 0.001; ***0.0001 < adjusted p-value < 0.0005; ****p-value < 0.0001.
Figure 5LC-MS/MS identification and quantification of prostaglandins in the culture medium during Thalassiosira rotula growth. Concentration trends of the prostaglandins in pg mL−1 cell−1 during the 10 days were identified and measured by either comparison with pure standards (asterisks) or by comparison with fragmentation data reported in the literature. # indicates PGs for which Day 6 vs Day10 values are significantly different by one-way ANOVA analysis considering day 6 as reference time point. Dashed lines refer to day 6.
One-way ANOVA analysis over the time points considered during the 10 day Thalassiosira rotula growth curve.
| PG | Tukey’s multiple comparisons test | Adjusted p-value/Significance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGA2 | PGB2 | PGD1 | PGD3 | PGE1 | PGE2 | PGE3 | PGEM | PGFM | 15-d-PGJ2 | 15-d-PGD2 | 2,3-dinor-11b-PGF2 | ||
| ANOVA P value | 0.068ns | 0.221ns | 0.385ns | 0.0701ns | |||||||||
| Day3 vs Day4 | 0,3042 ns | 0,255 ns | 0,759 ns | 0,241 ns | 0,754 ns | 0,110 ns | 0,5728 ns | 0,4080 ns | 0,4514 ns | 0,3189 ns | 0,3011 ns | 0,3651 ns | |
| Day3 vs Day5 | 0,9845 ns | 0,991 ns | 0,463 ns | 0,969 ns | 0,317 ns | 0,158 ns | 0,9976 ns | 0,5487 ns | 0,5900 ns | 0,8117 ns | 0,9034 ns | 0,5375 ns | |
| Day3 vs Day6 | 0,7557 ns | 0,743 ns | 0,683 ns | 0,439 ns | 0,670 ns | 0,108 ns | 0,7541 ns | 0,7086 ns | 0,3843 ns | 0,5486 ns | 0,7405 ns | 0,5104 ns | |
| Day3 vs Day7 | 0,9794 ns | 0,968 ns | 0,856 ns | 0,982 ns | 0,832 ns | 0,144 ns | 0,9991 ns | 0,6146 ns | 0,4521 ns | 0,7442 ns | 0,9648 ns | 0,9979 ns | |
| Day3 vs Day10 | 0,5089 ns | 0,238 ns | 0,624 ns | 0,289 ns | 0,588 ns | 0,071 ns | 0,9574 ns | 0,7949 ns | 0,9210 ns | 0,4168 ns | 0,6952 ns | ||
| Day4 vs Day5 | 0,6404 ns | 0,525 ns | 0,994 ns | 0,610 ns | 0,9581 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,8104 ns | 0,9998 ns | 0,9998 ns | 0,9309 ns | 0,8326 ns | 0,9993 ns | |
| Day4 vs Day6 | 0,9504 ns | 0,922 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,997 ns | 0,9999 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,9994 ns | 0,9931 ns | >0,9999 ns | 0,9970 ns | 0,9550 ns | 0,9997 ns | |
| Day4 vs Day7 | 0,6655 ns | 0,637 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,557 ns | 0,9999 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,7685 ns | >0,9999 ns | 0,9624 ns | 0,7139 ns | 0,5886 ns | ||
| Day4 vs Day10 | 0,103 ns | 0,0916 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,2003 ns | 0,9873 ns | 0,0732 ns | |||||||
| Day5 vs Day6 | 0,9786 ns | 0,963 ns | 0,998 ns | 0,851 ns | 0,9823 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,9345 ns | 0,9997 ns | 0,9986 ns | 0,9961 ns | 0,9990 ns | >0,9999 ns | |
| Day5 vs Day7 | 0,9999 Ns | 0,999 ns | 0,974 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,9169 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,9999 ns | 0,0542 ns | 0,9998 ns | >0,9999 ns | 0,9999 ns | 0,7733 ns | |
| Day5 vs Day10 | 0,219 ns | 0,098 ns | 0,090 ns | 0,995 ns | 0,8025 ns | 0,9988 ns | 0,3050 ns | 0,0944 ns | 0,0663 ns | ||||
| Day6 vs Day7 | 0,9839 ns | 0,989 | 0,999 ns | 0,808 ns | 0,9995 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,9091 ns | 0,0861 ns | >0,9999 ns | 0,9992 ns | 0,9899 ns | 0,7478 ns | |
| Day6 vs Day10 | 0,0731 ns | 0,082 ns | 0,0714 ns | 0,999 ns | 0,3164 ns | 0,9706 ns | 0,1516 ns | 0,0523 ns | 0,0612 ns | ||||
| Day7 vs Day10 | 0,2056 ns | 0,071 ns | 0,142 ns | 0,105 ns | 0,118 ns | 0,997 ns | 0,8417 ns | 0,9874 ns | 0,2539 ns | 0,1367 ns | 0,4585 ns | ||
One-way ANOVA analysis over the time points day 6 to day 10 of the ten day Thalassiosira rotula growth curve, considering Day 6 as reference time point.
| PG | Tukey’s multiple comparisons test | Adjusted p-value/Significance | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGA2 | PGB2 | PGD1 | PGD3 | PGE1 | PGE2 | PGE3 | PGEM | PGFM | 15-d-PGJ2 | 15-d-PGD2 | 2,3-dinor-11b-PGF2 | ||
| ANOVA P value | 0.068ns | 0.221ns | 0.385ns | 0.0701ns | |||||||||
| Day6 vs Day3 | 0,5521 | 0,537 | 0,472 | 0,257 | 0,458 | 0,550 | 0,498 | 0,218 | 0,345 | 0,534 | 0,313 | ||
| Day6 vs Day4 | 0,8574 | 0,8 | 0,999 | 0,987 | 0,99 | >0,999 | 0,997 | 0,973 | 0,999 | 0,987 | 0,868 | 0,998 | |
| Day6 vs Day5 | 0,9278 | 0,9 | 0,993 | 0,679 | 0,938 | 0,999 | 0,823 | 0,998 | 0,994 | 0,984 | 0,995 | >0,999 | |
| Day6 vs Day7 | 0,9430 | 0,1 | 0,996 | 0,618 | 0,997 | 0,999 | 0,774 | 0,999 | 0,996 | 0,962 | 0,543 | ||
| Day6 vs Day10 | 0,999 | 0,172 | 0,906 | 0,074 | |||||||||
| Gene | Primer Sequence Forward Reverse | Length (bp) | Tm °C | GC content (%) | Amplicon Length (bp) | |
| COX-1 or PgG/Hs2 | TCATCAAGGGAGGAGAATGG | CTTCCACCAAGAGCGAAGAC | 20 | 58.4/60.5 | 50/55 | 170 |
| PgEs2 | TTCCAAACAGGGCAAGTTAC | TTGCACGAGACAGATTGGAG | 20 | 56.4/58.4 | 45/50 | 183 |
| PgFs | TCTCCCCTATCGAGGGTTCT | AGCTCCACTCTGCTATCC | 20/18 | 60.5/56.3 | 55/56 | 114 |
| TBP | CCTTCTTCAACCCCTCCACCAAC | GTTCGCTCATCCCACGTTTTCG | 23/22 | 66.6/64.2 | 57/55 | 161 |
| ACTIN | TCGGCCCTTGAGAAGAGTTTCG | GATGGTCTGGAAAGTGGAGTCC | 22 | 64.2/64.2 | 55/55 | 147 |