Literature DB >> 32213919

Ranking Preventive Interventions from Different Policy Domains: What Are the Most Cost-Effective Ways to Improve Public Health?

Nina van der Vliet1,2, Anita W M Suijkerbuijk1, Adriana T de Blaeij1, G Ardine de Wit1,3, Paul F van Gils1, Brigit A M Staatsen1, Rob Maas1, Johan J Polder1,2.   

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that in order to promote public health and prevent diseases, a wide range of scientific disciplines and sectors beyond the health sector need to be involved. Evidence-based interventions, beyond preventive health interventions targeting disease risk factors and interventions from other sectors, should be developed and implemented. Investing in these preventive health policies is challenging as budgets have to compete with other governmental expenditures. The current study aimed to identify, compare and rank cost-effective preventive interventions targeting metabolic, environmental, occupational and behavioral risk factors. To identify these interventions, a literature search was performed including original full economic evaluations of Western country interventions that had not yet been implemented in the Netherlands. Several workshops were held with experts from different disciplines. In total, 51 different interventions (including 13 cost saving interventions) were identified and ranked based on their incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and potential averted disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), resulting in two rankings of the most cost-effective interventions and one ranking of the 13 cost saving interventions. This approach, resulting in an intersectoral ranking, can assist policy makers in implementing cost-effective preventive action that considers not only the health sector, but also other sectors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-effectiveness; cross-sectoral; health; preventive interventions; ranking

Year:  2020        PMID: 32213919     DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17062160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  4 in total

1.  Health effects and cost-effectiveness of a multilevel physical activity intervention in low-income older adults; results from the PEP4PA cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Katie Crist; Kelsie M Full; Sarah Linke; Fatima Tuz-Zahra; Khalisa Bolling; Brittany Lewars; Chenyu Liu; Yuyan Shi; Dori Rosenberg; Marta Jankowska; Tarik Benmarhnia; Loki Natarajan
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 8.915

2.  Effectiveness and Policy Determinants of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes.

Authors:  L L Hagenaars; P P T Jeurissen; N S Klazinga; S Listl; M Jevdjevic
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.116

3.  An Economic Evaluation of 'Sheds for Life': A Community-Based Men's Health Initiative for Men's Sheds in Ireland.

Authors:  Aisling McGrath; Niamh Murphy; Tom Egan; Gillian Ormond; Noel Richardson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Body mass index in young men in Switzerland after the national shutdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from a cross-sectional monitoring study at the population level since 2010.

Authors:  Samuel Meili; Marek Brabec; Frank Rühli; Thomas W Buehrer; Nejla Gültekin; Zeno Stanga; Nicole Bender; Kaspar Staub; Emilie Reber
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.424

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.