OBJECTIVE: Flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) and flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) imply a linearized expiration, and were suggested as new approaches for lung-protective ventilation, especially in the case of an inhomogeneous lung. We hypothesized that a linearized expiration homogenizes the pressure distribution between compartments during expiration, compared to volume-controlled (VCV) and pressure-controlled (PCV) ventilation. APPROACH: We investigated the expiratory pressure decays in a physical model of an inhomogeneous respiratory system. The model contained four compartments of which two had a high (25 ml cmH2O-1) and two a low compliance (10 ml cmH2O-1). These were combined with either a high (6.5 cmH2O s l-1) or low resistance (2.8 cmH2O s l-1), respectively. The model was ventilated in all modes at various tidal volumes and peak pressures, and we determined in each compartment the expiratory time at which the pressure declined to 50% (t50) of the end-inspiratory pressure, and the maximal differences of t50 (Δt50) and pressure (Δpmax) between all compartments. MAIN RESULTS: During FLEX and FCV, t50 was 6- to 7-fold higher compared to VCV and PCV (all P < 0.001). During VCV and PCV, Δt50 was higher (128 ± 18 ms) compared to FLEX and FCV (49 ± 19 ms; all P < 0.001). Δpmax reached up to 3.8 ± 0.2 cmH2O during VCV and PCV, but only 0.6 ± 0.1 cmH2O during FLEX and FCV (P < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: FLEX and FCV provide a more homogeneous expiratory pressure distribution between compartments with different mechanical properties compared with VCV and PCV. This may reduce shear stress within inhomogeneous lung tissue.
OBJECTIVE: Flow-controlled expiration (FLEX) and flow-controlled ventilation (FCV) imply a linearized expiration, and were suggested as new approaches for lung-protective ventilation, especially in the case of an inhomogeneous lung. We hypothesized that a linearized expiration homogenizes the pressure distribution between compartments during expiration, compared to volume-controlled (VCV) and pressure-controlled (PCV) ventilation. APPROACH: We investigated the expiratory pressure decays in a physical model of an inhomogeneous respiratory system. The model contained four compartments of which two had a high (25 ml cmH2O-1) and two a low compliance (10 ml cmH2O-1). These were combined with either a high (6.5 cmH2O s l-1) or low resistance (2.8 cmH2O s l-1), respectively. The model was ventilated in all modes at various tidal volumes and peak pressures, and we determined in each compartment the expiratory time at which the pressure declined to 50% (t50) of the end-inspiratory pressure, and the maximal differences of t50 (Δt50) and pressure (Δpmax) between all compartments. MAIN RESULTS: During FLEX and FCV, t50 was 6- to 7-fold higher compared to VCV and PCV (all P < 0.001). During VCV and PCV, Δt50 was higher (128 ± 18 ms) compared to FLEX and FCV (49 ± 19 ms; all P < 0.001). Δpmax reached up to 3.8 ± 0.2 cmH2O during VCV and PCV, but only 0.6 ± 0.1 cmH2O during FLEX and FCV (P < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: FLEX and FCV provide a more homogeneous expiratory pressure distribution between compartments with different mechanical properties compared with VCV and PCV. This may reduce shear stress within inhomogeneous lung tissue.