Literature DB >> 32213552

Preoperative detection of malignancy in fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) smears with indeterminate cytology (Bethesda III, IV) by a combined molecular classifier.

Sergei Titov1,2, Pavel S Demenkov3,4, Sergei A Lukyanov5, Sergei V Sergiyko5, Gevork A Katanyan6, Yulia A Veryaskina7,3, Mikhail K Ivanov7,2.   

Abstract

AIMS: Analysis of molecular markers in addition to cytological analysis of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) samples is a promising way to improve the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Previously, we have developed an algorithm for the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules by means of a small set of molecular markers. Here, we aimed to validate this approach using FNA cytology samples of Bethesda categories III and IV, in which preoperative detection of malignancy by cytological analysis is impossible.
METHODS: A total of 122 FNA smears from patients with indeterminate cytology (Bethesda III: 13 patients, Bethesda IV: 109 patients) were analysed by real-time PCR regarding the preselected set of molecular markers (the BRAF V600E mutation, normalised concentrations of HMGA2 mRNA, 3 microRNAs, and the mitochondrial/nuclear DNA ratio). The decision tree-based classifier was used to discriminate between benign and malignant tumours.
RESULTS: The molecular testing detected malignancy in FNA smears of indeterminate cytology with 89.2% sensitivity, 84.6% positive predictive value, 92.9% specificity and 95.2% negative predictive value; these characteristics are comparable with those of more complicated commercial tests. Residual risk of malignancy for the thyroid nodules that were shown to be benign by this molecular method did not exceed the reported risk of malignancy for Bethesda II histological diagnosis. Analytical-accuracy assessment revealed required nucleic-acid input of ≥5 ng.
CONCLUSIONS: The study shows feasibility of preoperative differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules of indeterminate cytology using a small panel of molecular markers of different types by a simple PCR-based method using stained FNA smears. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostics; molecular oncology; thyroid cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32213552     DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  4 in total

1.  Do ACR TI-RADS scores demonstrate unique thyroid molecular profiles?

Authors:  Rong Xia; Wei Sun; Joseph Yee; Sheila Sheth; Chrystia Slywotzky; Steven Hodak; Tamar C Brandler
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2021-12-20

Review 2.  Personalized Diagnosis in Differentiated Thyroid Cancers by Molecular and Functional Imaging Biomarkers: Present and Future.

Authors:  Laura Teodoriu; Letitia Leustean; Maria-Christina Ungureanu; Stefana Bilha; Irena Grierosu; Mioara Matei; Cristina Preda; Cipriana Stefanescu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-10

3.  Cytological and molecular diagnosis of Hürthle cell thyroid tumors: Analysis of three cases.

Authors:  Sergei E Titov; Tatiana L Poloz; Yulia A Veryaskina; Vladimir V Anishchenko
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-28

4.  Yield and costs of molecular diagnostics on thyroid cytology slides in the Netherlands, adapting the Bethesda classification.

Authors:  Mehtap Derya Aydemirli; Marieke Snel; Tom van Wezel; Dina Ruano; Christianne M H Obbink; Wilbert B van den Hout; Abbey Schepers; Hans Morreau
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab       Date:  2021-09-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.