| Literature DB >> 32213210 |
Antonio B Porcaro1, Alessandro Tafuri1,2, Marco Sebben1, Giovanni Novella1, Tania Processali1, Marco Pirozzi1, Nelia Amigoni1, Riccardo Rizzetto1, Aliasger Shakir2, Matteo Brunelli3, Maria Angela Cerruto1, Filippo Migliorini1, Salvatore Siracusano1, Walter Artibani1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between prostate volume index (PVI), and prostatic chronic inflammation (PCI) as predictors of prostate cancer (PCA). PVI is the ratio between the central transition zone volume (CTZV) and the peripheral zone volume (PZV).Entities:
Keywords: Prostate; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms
Year: 2020 PMID: 32213210 PMCID: PMC7239280 DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0146
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Braz J Urol ISSN: 1677-5538 Impact factor: 1.541
Statistics of factors in patients undergoing baseline biopsies.
| Factors | Population | Negative cores | Positive cores (^) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | 945 | 468 (49,5) | 477 (50,7) |
| mean (SD) | 66.4 (8.3) | 64.4 (8) | 68.3 (8.1) |
| mean (SD) | 26.4 (3.2) | 26.3 (3.3) | 26.5 (3.1) |
| mean (SD) | 7.2 (4.5) | 6.6 (3.8) | 7.8 (5) |
| mean (SD) | 42.1 (20.2) | 48.3 (22.4) | 36 (15.4) |
| mean (SD) | 21.1 (13.5) | 25.4 (15.6) | 16.8 (9.3) |
| mean (SD) | 21 (8.9) | 22.8 (9.4) | 19.2 (7.9) |
| mean (SD) | 0.19 (0.14) | 0.15 (0.09) | 0.24 (0.17) |
| mean (SD) | 1.04 (0.82) | 1.18 (1.08) | 0.90 (0.40) |
| normal | 637 (67.4) | 359 (76.7) | 278 (58.3) |
| abnormal | 205 (21.7) | 109 (23.3) | 199 (41.7) |
| absent | 740 (78.3) | 308 (65.8) | 432 (90.6) |
| present | 205 (21..7) | 160 (34.2) | 45 (9.4) |
| 1 | 234 (49.1) | ||
| 2 | 110 (23.1) | ||
| 3 | 72 (15.1) | ||
| 4 | 36 (7.5) | ||
| 5 | 25 (5.2) | ||
| mean (SD) | 4.7 (3.2) |
(^) for prostate cancer; (*); ratio of PSA on TPV; (**), ratio of CTZV on PZV; (^), all tests comparing the two groups were significant except for BMI; SD: standard deviation
Figure 1ercentages of negative and positive cores in 945 patients who underwent standard baseline trans-perineal biopsies because of suspected prostate cancer.
Linear regression models of factors predicting the number of positive cores at baseline biopsies in 945 cases.
| Univariate model | Multivariate model (I) | Multivariate model (II) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Factors | Regression coefficients (95%CI) | P-value | Regression coefficients (95%CI) | P-value | Regression coefficients (95%CI) | P-value |
| Age (*) | 5.8 (4.2 ; 7.4) | <0,0001 | 4.4 (3.1 ; 5.8) | <0.0001 | 4.3 (2.9 ; 5.7) | <0.0001 |
| PSA (*) | 1.3 (1.0 ; 1.7) | <0.0001 | 1.8 (1.5 ; 2.1) | <0.0001 | ||
| TPV (*) | -2.1 (-2.6 ; -1.7) | <0.0001 | -2.1 (-2.6 ; -1.7) | <0.0001 | ||
| PSAD (*) | 2.1 (1.8 ; 2.3) | <0.0001 | 1.9 (1.6; 2.2) | <0.0001 | ||
| PVI (*) | -1.3 (-1.7 ; -0.8) | <0.0001 | -0.6 (-1.0 ; -0.2) | 0.002 | -0.7 (-1.1 ; -0.4) | <0.0001 |
| normal | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| abnormal | 2.2 (1.7 ; 2.5) | <0.0001 | 1.7 (1.4 ; 2.1) | <0.0001 | 1.8 (1.4 ; 2.2) | <0.0001 |
| absent | Ref | Ref | ||||
| present | -2.1 (-2.5 ; -1.5) | <0.0001 | -1.4 (-1.9 ; -1.1) | <0.0001 | -1.5 (-1.9 ; -1.1) | <0.0001 |
See also Table 1; (*) factor evaluated as natural log; CI. confidence intervals
Figure 2Bivariate model predicting the mean number of positive cores by prostatic specific antigen density (PSAD) and prostate volume index (PVI) quartiles.
Figure 3Bivariate model predicting the mean number of positive cores by prostatic chronic inflammation (PCI) and prostate volume index (PVI) quartiles.
Figure 4The regression lines of the transitional zone volume (TZV) as a function of the peripheral zone volume (PZV). The patients are classified into 4 groups according to PVI quartiles. The different relations between volumes are outlined along different PVI quartiles.
Bivariate linear regression models of factors predicting the number of positive cores.
| Factors | Regression coefficients (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|---|---|
| -1.4 (-1.8 ; -1.1) | <0.0001 | |
| <62 | Ref | |
| 62-67 | 0.7 (0.2 ; 1.3) | 0.007 |
| 68-72 | 1.1 (0.5 ; 1.7) | <0.0001 |
| >72 | 2.1 (1.5 ; 2.7) | <0.0001 |
| -1.4 (-1.9 ; -1.1) | <0.0001 | |
| <4.8 | Ref | |
| 4.8 - 6.2 | 0.2 (-0.2 ; 0.8) | 0.332 |
| 6.3 - 8.4 | 0.3 (-0.2 ; 0.9) | 0.223 |
| >8.4 | 2.0 (1.4 ; 2.6) | <0.0001 |
| -0.7 (-1.1 ; -0.2) | <0.0001 | |
| <28.2 | Ref | |
| 28.2 - 37.9 | -0.7 (-1.2 ; -0.1) | 0.016 |
| 38 - 51.5 | -1.3 (-1.9 ; -0.7) | >0.0001 |
| >51.5 | -2.1 (-2.6 ; -1.4) | <0.0001 |
| -0.7 (-1.2 ; -0.3) | <0.0001 | |
| <0.12 | Ref | |
| 0.12 - 0.16 | 0.6 (0.1 ; 1.1) | 0.023 |
| 0.17 - 0.23 | 1.2 (0.7 ; 1.7) | <0.0001 |
| >0.23 | 3.5 (2.9 ; 4.1) | <0.0001 |
| -1.2 (-1.5 ; -0.7) | <0.0001 | |
| normal | Ref | |
| abnormal | 2.0 (1.6 ; 2.4) | <0.0001 |
| -1.1 (-1.4 ; -0.6) | <0.0001 | |
| absent | Ref | |
| present | -1.8 (-2.3 ; -1.4) | <0.0001 |
See also Table 1; (*) evaluated by natural logs