| Literature DB >> 32213208 |
Ertugrul Sefik1, Serdar Celik1, Bulent Gunlusoy1, Ismail Basmaci1, Ibrahim H Bozkurt1, Tansu Degirmenci1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of preoperative renal function on survival outcomes in patients who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) with non-continent urinary diversion (UD).Entities:
Keywords: Cystectomy; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms; Urinary Diversion
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32213208 PMCID: PMC7239276 DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Braz J Urol ISSN: 1677-5538 Impact factor: 1.541
Comparison of patient’s characteristics and preoperative findings between eGFR <60mL/min/1.73m2 and eGFR ≥60mL/min/1.73m2 groups according to preoperative eGFR levels.
| Preoperative eGFR <60mL/min/1.73m2 (n=46) | Preoperative eGFR ≥60mL/min/1.73m2 (n=86) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) (mean±SD) | 65.9±9.5 | 63.7±8.2 | 0.145 | |
| Female | 7 | 5 | ||
| Male | 39 | 81 | ||
| Preoperative creatinine (mean±SD) | 1.69±0.57 | 0.96±0.15 | - | |
| Preoperative eGFR (mean±SD) | 41.6±13 | 80±16.9 | - | |
| Postoperative 3 month creatinine (mean±SD) | 1.72±0.66 | 1.21±0.57 | <0.001 | |
| Postoperative 3 month eGFR (mean±SD) | 45±18.4 | 69.9±22.9 | <0.001 | |
| Δ creatinine (mean±SD) | 0.04±0.66 | 0.26±0.55 | 0.015 | |
| 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.218 | |
| 2 | 3 | 46 | ||
| 3 | 12 | 34 | ||
| 4 | 0 | 2 | ||
| 0 | 8 | 25 | 0.364 | |
| 1 | 24 | 36 | ||
| 2 | 9 | 16 | ||
| 3 | 3 | 7 | ||
| 4 | 1 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.295 | |
| 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| 2 | 13 | 13 | ||
| 3+ | 32 | 70 | ||
| DM, n (%) | 10 (21.7) | 15 (17.4) | 0.548 | |
| HT, n (%) | 24 (52.2) | 30 (34.9) | 0.054 | |
| Any comorbidity, n (%) | 37 (80.4) | 60 (69.8) | 0.186 | |
| positive | 30 | 23 | <0.001 | |
| negative | 16 | 63 | *<0.001 | |
| unilateral | 18 | 21 | 0.01 | |
| bilateral | 12 | 2 | *0.019 | |
| 1 | 1 | 4 | 0.276 | |
| 2 | 9 | 4 | ||
| 3 | 15 | 10 | ||
| 4 | 5 | 5 | ||
| Preoperative nephrostomy tube insertion for grade 3-4 hydrophrosis | 12 (60) | 7 (46.7) | 0.767 | |
Mann Whitney U test and Pearson Chi-square test.
*Binary logistic regression analysis for significant data of univariate analysis results.
ASA = American Society of Anesthesiologists; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; DM = Diabetes mellitus; HT = Hypertension
Figure 1A) Overall survival plots of Kaplan-Maier analysis. B) Cancer specific survival plots of Kaplan-Maier analysis.
Comparison of operative and pathologic data between Group 1 and Group 2.
| Preoperative eGFR <60mL/min/1.73 m2 (n=46) | Preoperative eGFR ≥60mL/min/1.73 m2 (n=86) | P* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤T1 | 6 | 9 | 0.721 | |
| T2 | 38 | 75 | ||
| T3 | 2 | 2 | ||
| Grade1 | 1 | 2 | 0.485 | |
| Grade2 | 3 | 2 | ||
| Grade3 | 42 | 82 | ||
| positive | 10 | 30 | 0.108 | |
| negative | 36 | 55 | ||
| Operation time (hours) | 5.6±1.3 | 5.8±1.1 | 0.369 | |
| T1 | 8 | 20 | 0.364 | |
| T2 | 17 | 39 | ||
| T3 | 8 | 13 | ||
| T4 | 13 | 14 | ||
| 1 | 3 | 5 | 0.905 | |
| 2 | 1 | 3 | ||
| 3 | 37 | 68 | ||
| positive | 13 | 13 | 0.07 | |
| negative | 33 | 73 | ||
| Number of dissected lymph node | 12.4±5.9 | 13.2±4.9 | 0.430 | |
| Positive lymph node ratio | 1.1±2.4 | 0.4±1.2 | 0.121 | |
| Positive | 11 | 14 | 0.318 | |
| Negative | 34 | 68 | ||
| Percentage of positive lymph node | 8.9±19.1 | 3.5±9.4 | 0.136 | |
| Ureterocutaneostomy | 23 | 32 | 0.156 | |
| Ileal conduit | 23 | 54 | ||
*Mann Whitney U test and Pearson Chi-square test
CIS = Carcinoma In Situ
Comparison of postoperative data, complications and survival findings between Group 1 and Group 2.
| Preoperative eGFR <60mL/min/1.73 m2 (n=46) | Preoperative eGFR ≥60mL/min/1.73 m2 (n=86) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 22 | 55 | 0.073 | |
| Negative | 24 | 31 | ||
| upstaging | 24 | 31 | 0.160 | |
| downstaging | 5 | 17 | ||
| No differance | 17 | 38 | ||
| Adjuvant chemotherapy, n (%) | 12 (26.1) | 22 (25.6) | 0.950 | |
| Overall Mortality, n (%) | 29 (63) | 35 (40.7) | 0.014 | |
| *0.015 | ||||
| Overall Survival | 43.6±6.9 | 62.2±5.8 | #0.037 | |
| Cancer Specific Mortality, n (%) | 21 (45.6) | 26 (30.2) | 0.078 | |
| Cancer Specific Survival | 56.8±8.3 | 70.5±5.9 | #0.087 | |
| Surgery time (hours) | 5.6±1.3 | 5.8±1.1 | 0.518 | |
| Hospitalization time | 11.3±4.6 | 12.1±6.3 | 0.475 | |
| Positive | 14 | 20 | 0.369 | |
| Negative | 31 | 66 | ||
| Positive | 15 | 41 | 0.095 | |
| Negative | 31 | 45 | ||
| 1 | 5 | 8 | 0.357 | |
| 2 | 34 | 51 | ||
| 3a | 1 | 2 | ||
| 3b | 3 | 15 | ||
| 4a | 1 | 7 | ||
| 5 | 2 | 3 | ||
Mann Whitney U test and Pearson Chi-square test
*Binary logistic regression analysis for significant data of univariate analysis results
# Kaplan-Maier survival analysis and the log-rank test
Univariate and multivariate analysis of the factors affecting on overall and cancer specific death.
| Overall death | Cancer specific death | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| n=64 | p | p* | n=47 | p | p* | ||
| Positive | 35 | 0.001 | 0.071 | 27 | 0.002 | 0.052 | |
| Negative | 29 | 20 | |||||
| ≤T1 | 8 | 0.501 | - | 5 | 0.247 | - | |
| T2 | 53 | 39 | |||||
| T3 | 3 | 3 | |||||
| <60 | 29 | 0.014 | p=0.040 | 21 | 0.078 | - | |
| ≥60 | 35 | HR:2.33 (CI:1.04-5.22) | 26 | ||||
| T1 | 10 | <0.001 | 0.118 | 6 | <0.001 | 0.614 | |
| T2 | 19 | 13 | |||||
| T3 | 13 | 10 | |||||
| T4 | 22 | 18 | |||||
| 1 | 4 | 0.988 | - | 3 | 0.890 | - | |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 55 | 40 | |||||
| Positive | 22 | <0.001 | 0.087 | 19 | <0.001 | 0.109 | |
| Negative | 42 | 28 | |||||
| Positive | 17 | 0.016 | 0.284 | 15 | 0.003 | 0.076 | |
| Negative | 42 | 28 | |||||
| Positive | 36 | 0.001 | 0.544 | 29 | 0.001 | 0.467 | |
| Negative | 28 | 18 | |||||
*Multivariate analysis results