Roberta Elisa Rossi1, Pietro Invernizzi2, Vincenzo Mazzaferro1, Sara Massironi3. 1. Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Fondazione, RCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT, National Cancer Institute) and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Center for Liver Autoimmune Diseases, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy. 3. Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors represent a recurring disease and long-acting somatostatin analogs can inhibit both gastrin release and endocrine cell proliferation. The efficacy and timing of this treatment are still unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature to clarify the role of somatostatin analog treatment in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify all the pertinent articles published in the last 15 years. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this systematic review on somatostatin analogs in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. A complete response rate ranged from 25-100%. When only the six prospective studies were considered, no significant heterogeneity was observed, and the pooled cumulative complete response rate was 84.5% (confidence interval 73.8-92.8). Three studies evaluated the type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumor recurrence, with a cumulative relapse rate of 30.2% (confidence interval 13.1-50.6) after 34 months. CONCLUSION: Somatostatin analogs, namely lanreotide and octreotide, have an excellent response rate, with a good safety profile in selected type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors, which cannot be safely managed by endoscopic follow-up or resection due to multiple or frequently recurring disease. After therapy discontinuation, the cumulative relapse rate observed after a median 34-month follow-up was relatively high (30.2%).
BACKGROUND: Type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors represent a recurring disease and long-acting somatostatin analogs can inhibit both gastrin release and endocrine cell proliferation. The efficacy and timing of this treatment are still unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature to clarify the role of somatostatin analog treatment in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify all the pertinent articles published in the last 15 years. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in this systematic review on somatostatin analogs in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. A complete response rate ranged from 25-100%. When only the six prospective studies were considered, no significant heterogeneity was observed, and the pooled cumulative complete response rate was 84.5% (confidence interval 73.8-92.8). Three studies evaluated the type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumor recurrence, with a cumulative relapse rate of 30.2% (confidence interval 13.1-50.6) after 34 months. CONCLUSION: Somatostatin analogs, namely lanreotide and octreotide, have an excellent response rate, with a good safety profile in selected type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors, which cannot be safely managed by endoscopic follow-up or resection due to multiple or frequently recurring disease. After therapy discontinuation, the cumulative relapse rate observed after a median 34-month follow-up was relatively high (30.2%).
Authors: G Delle Fave; D O'Toole; A Sundin; B Taal; P Ferolla; J K Ramage; D Ferone; T Ito; W Weber; Z Zheng-Pei; W W De Herder; A Pascher; P Ruszniewski Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: L Vannella; A Sbrozzi-Vanni; E Lahner; C Bordi; E Pilozzi; V D Corleto; J F Osborn; G Delle Fave; B Annibale Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg; Dimitrios Thomas; Jonathan R Strosberg; Ulrich-Frank Pape; Stephan Felder; Apostolos V Tsolakis; Krystallenia I Alexandraki; Merav Fraenkel; Leonard Saiegh; Petachia Reissman; Gregory Kaltsas; David J Gross Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2013-12-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Irvin M Modlin; Kjell Oberg; Daniel C Chung; Robert T Jensen; Wouter W de Herder; Rajesh V Thakker; Martyn Caplin; Gianfranco Delle Fave; Greg A Kaltsas; Eric P Krenning; Steven F Moss; Ola Nilsson; Guido Rindi; Ramon Salazar; Philippe Ruszniewski; Anders Sundin Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Molly E Roseland; Isaac R Francis; Kimberly L Shampain; Erica B Stein; Ashish P Wasnik; John D Millet Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2022-04-12
Authors: Qin Hui Sun; Zong Xiu Yin; Zhi Li; Shu Bo Tian; Hong Chang Wang; Fang Xu Zhang; Le Ping Li; Chun Ning Zheng; Shuai Kong Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-06-05 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Elettra Merola; Andrea Michielan; Umberto Rozzanigo; Marco Erini; Sandro Sferrazza; Stefano Marcucci; Chiara Sartori; Chiara Trentin; Giovanni de Pretis; Franca Chierichetti Journal: World J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2022-02-27
Authors: Klaire Exarchou; Nathan A Stephens; Andrew R Moore; Nathan R Howes; D Mark Pritchard Journal: Curr Oncol Rep Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 5.075