Literature DB >> 32212395

Optimizing Retention in a Pragmatic Trial of Community-Living Older Persons: The STRIDE Study.

Thomas M Gill1, Joanne M McGloin1, Amy Shelton1, Luann M Bianco1, Eleni A Skokos1, Nancy K Latham2, David A Ganz3,4, Linda V Nyquist5, Robert B Wallace6, Martha B Carnie2, Patricia C Dykes2, Lori A Goehring2, Margaret Doyle1, Peter A Charpentier1, Erich J Greene7, Katy L Araujo1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE) study is testing the effectiveness of a multifactorial intervention to prevent serious fall injuries. Our aim was to describe procedures that were implemented to optimize participant retention; report retention yields by age, sex, clinical site, and follow-up time; provide reasons for study withdrawals; and highlight the successes and lessons learned from the STRIDE retention efforts.
DESIGN: Pragmatic cluster randomized trial.
SETTING: A total of 86 primary care practices within 10 US healthcare systems. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5451 community-living persons, 70 years of age or older, at high risk for serious fall injuries. MEASUREMENTS: Study outcomes were collected every 4 months by a central call center. Reconsent was required to extend follow-up beyond the originally planned 36 months.
RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 3.2 years (interquartile range = 2.8-3.7 y), 439 (8.1%) participants died and 600 (11.0%) withdrew their consent or did not reconsent to extend follow-up beyond 36 months, yielding rates (per 100 person-years) of deaths and withdrawals of 2.6 and 3.6, respectively. The withdrawal rate increased with advancing age, was comparable for men and women, and did not differ much by clinical site. The most common reasons for withdrawal were illness and unable to contact for reconsent at 36 months. Completion of the follow-up interviews was greater than 93% at each time point. Most participants completed all (71.8%) or all but one (9.2%) of the follow-up interviews. The most common reason for not completing a follow-up interview was unable to contact, with rates ranging from 2.8% at 40 months to 4.6% at 20 months.
CONCLUSION: Completion of the thrice-yearly follow-up interviews in STRIDE was high, and retention of participants over 44 months exceeded the original projections. The procedures used in STRIDE, together with lessons learned, should assist other investigators who are planning or conducting large pragmatic trials of vulnerable older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1242-1249, 2020.
© 2020 The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  older persons; pragmatic trials; retention

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32212395      PMCID: PMC7707554          DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  22 in total

Review 1.  Lessons learned about minority recruitment and retention from the Centers on Minority Aging and Health Promotion.

Authors:  Sue Levkoff; Herman Sanchez
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2003-02

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  Population-based cohort studies.

Authors:  M Szklo
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  The effects of an open design on trial participant recruitment, compliance and retention--a randomized controlled trial comparison with a blinded, placebo-controlled design.

Authors:  Alison Avenell; Adrian M Grant; Maureen McGee; Gladys McPherson; Marion K Campbell; Magnus A McGee
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE): A Cluster-Randomized Pragmatic Trial of a Multifactorial Fall Injury Prevention Strategy: Design and Methods.

Authors:  Shalender Bhasin; Thomas M Gill; David B Reuben; Nancy K Latham; Jerry H Gurwitz; Patricia Dykes; Siobhan McMahon; Thomas W Storer; Pamela W Duncan; David A Ganz; Shehzad Basaria; Michael E Miller; Thomas G Travison; Erich J Greene; James Dziura; Denise Esserman; Heather Allore; Martha B Carnie; Maureen Fagan; Catherine Hanson; Dorothy Baker; Susan L Greenspan; Neil Alexander; Fred Ko; Albert L Siu; Elena Volpi; Albert W Wu; Jeremy Rich; Stephen C Waring; Robert Wallace; Carri Casteel; Jay Magaziner; Peter Charpentier; Charles Lu; Katy Araujo; Haseena Rajeevan; Scott Margolis; Richard Eder; Joanne M McGloin; Eleni Skokos; Jocelyn Wiggins; Lawrence Garber; Steven B Clauser; Rosaly Correa-De-Araujo; Peter Peduzzi
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 6.  A road map for the recruitment and retention of older adult participants for longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Janet Bonk
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 7.  Evidence for strategies that improve recruitment and retention of adults aged 65 years and over in randomised trials and observational studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosie J Lacey; Ross Wilkie; Gwenllian Wynne-Jones; Joanne L Jordan; Emily Wersocki; John McBeth
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 10.668

8.  A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of offering study results as an incentive to increase response rates to postal questionnaires [ISRCTN26118436].

Authors:  Sarah Cockayne; David J Torgerson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Prior notification of trial participants by newsletter increased response rates: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Natasha Mitchell; Catherine E Hewitt; Elizabeth Lenaghan; Eleanor Platt; Lee Shepstone; David J Torgerson
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 10.  Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.

Authors:  Valerie C Brueton; Jayne Tierney; Sally Stenning; Seeromanie Harding; Sarah Meredith; Irwin Nazareth; Greta Rait
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  A Randomized Trial of a Multifactorial Strategy to Prevent Serious Fall Injuries.

Authors:  Shalender Bhasin; Thomas M Gill; David B Reuben; Nancy K Latham; David A Ganz; Erich J Greene; James Dziura; Shehzad Basaria; Jerry H Gurwitz; Patricia C Dykes; Siobhan McMahon; Thomas W Storer; Priscilla Gazarian; Michael E Miller; Thomas G Travison; Denise Esserman; Martha B Carnie; Lori Goehring; Maureen Fagan; Susan L Greenspan; Neil Alexander; Jocelyn Wiggins; Fred Ko; Albert L Siu; Elena Volpi; Albert W Wu; Jeremy Rich; Stephen C Waring; Robert B Wallace; Carri Casteel; Neil M Resnick; Jay Magaziner; Peter Charpentier; Charles Lu; Katy Araujo; Haseena Rajeevan; Can Meng; Heather Allore; Brooke F Brawley; Rich Eder; Joanne M McGloin; Eleni A Skokos; Pamela W Duncan; Dorothy Baker; Chad Boult; Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo; Peter Peduzzi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Effect of a Multifactorial Fall Injury Prevention Intervention on Patient Well-Being: The STRIDE Study.

Authors:  Thomas M Gill; Shalender Bhasin; David B Reuben; Nancy K Latham; Katy Araujo; David A Ganz; Chad Boult; Albert W Wu; Jay Magaziner; Neil Alexander; Robert B Wallace; Michael E Miller; Thomas G Travison; Susan L Greenspan; Jerry H Gurwitz; Jeremy Rich; Elena Volpi; Stephen C Waring; Todd M Manini; Lillian C Min; Jeanne Teresi; Patricia C Dykes; Siobhan McMahon; Joanne M McGloin; Eleni A Skokos; Peter Charpentier; Shehzad Basaria; Pamela W Duncan; Thomas W Storer; Priscilla Gazarian; Heather G Allore; James Dziura; Denise Esserman; Martha B Carnie; Catherine Hanson; Fred Ko; Neil M Resnick; Jocelyn Wiggins; Charles Lu; Can Meng; Lori Goehring; Maureen Fagan; Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo; Carri Casteel; Peter Peduzzi; Erich J Greene
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Estimation of ascertainment bias and its effect on power in clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes.

Authors:  Erich J Greene; Peter Peduzzi; James Dziura; Can Meng; Michael E Miller; Thomas G Travison; Denise Esserman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Development of Written Materials for Participants in an Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Screening Trial.

Authors:  Katharine J Head; Jane A Hartsock; Tamilyn Bakas; Malaz A Boustani; Matthew Schroeder; Nicole R Fowler
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-04-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.