Literature DB >> 32212032

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: useful routine option for coronary revascularization in selected cases.

Taichi Sakaguchi1, Toshinori Totsugawa2, Kentaro Tamura2, Arudo Hiraoka2, Masaaki Ryomoto3, Naosumi Sekiya3, Genta Chikazawa2, Hidenori Yoshitaka2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The safety and feasibility of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG) were evaluated.
METHODS: From December 2012 to March 2019, 122 consecutive patients underwent MICS CABG via a left mini-thoracotomy under direct vision. The internal thoracic artery (ITA) was harvested from all, while bilateral ITAs (BITAs) were used in 36 patients, with the second ITA as an in situ (n = 18) or free (n = 18) graft. Proximal anastomosis of the free graft (ITA, radial artery, or saphenous vein segments) was performed directly onto the ascending aorta, or from the ITA as a Y- or I-composite graft.
RESULTS: Patient ages ranged from 38 to 89 years (mean 66.9 ± 9.6 years) and 102 were males. MICS CABG was completed without conversion in 116 patients (95.1%), of whom 76 underwent multivessel bypass grafting, with 2 grafts used in 52 and 3 or more in 24 patients. A cardiopulmonary bypass was performed in 17 patients. Perioperative mortality occurred in 1 patient who died of advanced cancer. There were no cases of reoperation for bleeding, stroke, or chest wound infection. The perioperative transfusion rate was 11.2%. Early graft patency was noted in 97.1%. The rate of freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization) was 89.7% at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: MICS CABG is feasible and showed good mid-term outcomes. BITAs can be harvested with this approach; thus, allowing for various graft designs. We recommend this as a useful option for coronary revascularization in selected cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bilateral internal thoracic arteries; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Hybrid coronary revascularization; Minimally invasive cardiac surgery; Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32212032     DOI: 10.1007/s11748-020-01336-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 1863-6705


  1 in total

1.  Comparing patient outcomes following minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting surgery vs. coronary artery bypass grafting: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lin Liang; Xiaolong Ma; Qingyu Kong; Wei Xiao; Jiaji Liu; Liqun Chi; Junming Zhu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.