| Literature DB >> 32211557 |
Chitra Lalloo1,2, Quynh Pham2,3, Joseph Cafazzo2,3, Elizabeth Stephenson4,5, Jennifer Stinson1,2.
Abstract
ResearchKit is an open-source software framework designed to streamline the process of screening and consenting participants into research studies. By digitizing traditionally analog processes, ResearchKit has potential to increase the reach, efficiency, and scalability of mobile health (mHealth) research. The model has been successfully applied in adult settings. However, to our knowledge, no group has sought to adapt ResearchKit for a paediatric research environment in Canada. The potential benefits for building paediatric mHealth apps compatible with remote eConsent are numerous: (1) access to studies can be broadened from small groups of children and families who live in close proximity to research sites to whole populations across geographical boundaries, (2) increased convenience for study participants because they can complete consent on their smartphone from their home, rather than in person or on paper, and (3) large-scale study enrollment can be conducted with fewer resources than traditional face-to-face methods. We describe the rationale and design of a proof-of-concept observational study focused on implementing remote eConsent in a Canadian paediatric population. A community-based sample of adolescents with arthritis will be remotely onboarded to use the iCanCope pain self-management app for 8-weeks. Outcomes will focus on: (1) fidelity and acceptability of the eConsent process, (2) fidelity of the iCanCope app in terms of engagement and acceptability, (3) participant study experience including level of perceived support and acceptability of study tasks, and (4) clinical outcomes related to use of the iCanCope app over an 8-week period.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; Arthritis; Electronic consent; Mobile health; Paediatric; ResearchKit
Year: 2020 PMID: 32211557 PMCID: PMC7083768 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun ISSN: 2451-8654
Fig. 1Screenshots of the iCanCope pain self-management app. The app has been developed natively (iOS, Android) through a collaboration between the Centre for Global eHealth Innovation (University Health Network) and The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada.
Fig. A.1Example of study recruitment poster
Eligibility screening process.
| # | Inclusion Criteria | Validation Method | Corresponding ResearchKit Survey Item |
|---|---|---|---|
| I.1 | Aged 12–18 years | Self-report | |
| I.2 | Diagnosed with arthritis | Self-report | |
| I.3 | Experiences arthritis-related pain, stiffness, or swelling. | Self-report | |
| I.4 | Resides in Canada | App can only be downloaded from the Canadian App Store. Additionally, geolocation of device IPs will be used to confirm location. | |
| I.5 | Able to speak and read English | Infer from ability to understand screening questions, consent form, and knowledge quiz. Note that it will not be possible to rule out possibility that a different person helped them to complete these steps. | |
| I.6 | Daily access to an | Individual will only be able to download and open the app on a compatible smartphone. Note that it will not be possible to independently confirm whether the individual has daily access to this device. | |
| I.7 | Cognitive capacity to independently provide informed consent | Infer from ability to understand screening questions, consent form, and knowledge quiz. Note that we will not be able to rule out possibility that a different person helped them to complete these steps. | |
| E.1 | Participant in another | Self-report as well as cross reference with hospital records of existing |
Fig. 2Possible outputs of eligibility screening survey.
Fig. 3Examples of ResearchKit eConsent module screens.
eConsent Modules for the iCanCope Study.
| Module | Description |
|---|---|
| Introduction to the study. | |
| Advise reader that there is a quiz at the end of the eConsent process. | |
| Explain measures taken to ensure privacy of participants. | |
| Outline time commitment involved in the study activities. | |
| Describe purpose, content, and number of study surveys. | |
| Outline potential study benefits. | |
| Outline potential study risks. | |
| Advise that the study is not part of medical care. | |
| Explain voluntary nature of the study and how to withdraw. | |
| Outline study reimbursement. | |
| Provide contact information and availability of the research staff. | |
| Multiple-choice quiz to confirm understanding of study. | |
| Display full consent form with “agree” and “disagree” buttons for adolescent to select. | |
| Capture name and e-signature (time and date stamped). |
Study outcomes categorized by research question.
| Outcome | Method of Assessment | Timing |
|---|---|---|
| Fidelity of automated participant screening, enrollment, and app deployment | Tracked centrally by study coordinator including technical issues. | During study |
| Participant acceptability and satisfaction with remote eConsent | Investigator-developed survey will assess participant perceptions regarding the eConsent process. | T1 |
| Fidelity of | Tracked centrally by study coordinator. | During study |
| Engagement with | Engagement with each feature will be tracked using the Analytics Platform to Evaluate Effective Engagement (APEEE) platform [ | During study |
| Participant perceptions about research experience | Investigator-developed survey to assess participant motivation for completing study, study experience, engagement with study, and desired future use of | T2 |
| Pain interference | PROMIS Pediatric Pain Interference Short Form [ | T1, T2 |
| Pain intensity and frequency | Pain intensity measured on the app daily check-in via 11-point numerical rating scale. Pain frequency is number of pain-days occurring during each 7-day measurement period. | Daily during study period |
| Pain coping | The Short-Form Pain Coping Questionnaire [ | T1, T2 |
| Pain self-efficacy | The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire [ | T1, T2 |
| Patient global impression of change | Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) (1 item) will assess participant impression of change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life related to their painful condition. | T1, T2 |
Categories of user-level app engagement.
| iCanCope feature | Low engagement | Moderate engagement | High engagement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Check-In | <25% of possible check-ins completed over 56 days (i.e. <14 reports) | 25–75% of possible check-ins completed over 56 days (i.e. 14–41 reports) | ≥75% of possible check-ins completed over 56 days (i.e. ≥42 reports) |
| Goals | No goals completed | To be defined based on usage data | To be defined based on usage data |
| Community | No interaction (posts, likes) | To be defined based on usage data | To be defined based on usage data |