Christopher Fang Junxian 1 , Remesh Kunnasegaran 1 , Gowreeson Thevendran 1,2 . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study compares radiological and functional outcomes of patients with symptomatic Adult Acquired Flat Foot Deformity (AFFD) secondary to stage 2B Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction (PTTD) treated with either a Subtalar Arthroereisis (SA) implant or a Lateral Column Lengthening (LCL) procedure. The aim of the study is to determine if the Subtalar Arthroereisis procedure is an acceptable surgical adjunct in our treatment armamentarium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 patients (22 feet) were evaluated. 12 consecutive patients (n = 12) underwent a Subtalar Arthroereisis procedure while 9 patients (n = 10) underwent a Lateral Column Lengthening procedure. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) midfoot score, Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Visual Analog of Pain Scale (VAS), preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. 10 radiological parameters were analyzed. All complications were tabulated. RESULTS: Significant improvements in functional outcomes were noted in both groups of patients. Radiographically, some loss of correction was noted in the SA group and no loss of correction in the LCL group, respectively. In the SA group, 6 patients complained of sinus tarsi pain in the postoperative period and 4 required removal of implants. No implants were removed in the LCL group. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that subtalar arthroereisis may be a reasonable procedure to utilize in the treatment of AAFD, albeit with a relatively high implant-removal rate. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.
BACKGROUND: This study compares radiological and functional outcomes of patients with symptomatic Adult Acquired Flat Foot Deformity (AFFD) secondary to stage 2B Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction (PTTD) treated with either a Subtalar Arthroereisis (SA) implant or a Lateral Column Lengthening (LCL) procedure. The aim of the study is to determine if the Subtalar Arthroereisis procedure is an acceptable surgical adjunct in our treatment armamentarium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 21 patients (22 feet) were evaluated. 12 consecutive patients (n = 12) underwent a Subtalar Arthroereisis procedure while 9 patients (n = 10) underwent a Lateral Column Lengthening procedure. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) midfoot score, Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Visual Analog of Pain Scale (VAS), preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. 10 radiological parameters were analyzed. All complications were tabulated. RESULTS: Significant improvements in functional outcomes were noted in both groups of patients. Radiographically, some loss of correction was noted in the SA group and no loss of correction in the LCL group, respectively. In the SA group, 6 patients complained of sinus tarsi pain in the postoperative period and 4 required removal of implants. No implants were removed in the LCL group. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that subtalar arthroereisis may be a reasonable procedure to utilize in the treatment of AAFD, albeit with a relatively high implant-removal rate. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.
Entities: Chemical
Keywords:
Flatfeet; Lateral column lengthening; Pes planovalgus; Subtalar arthroereisis
Year: 2020
PMID: 32211126 PMCID: PMC7065731 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-019-00011-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Orthop ISSN: 0019-5413 Impact factor: 1.251