Zhaosheng Jin1, Ru Li1, Tong J Gan1, Yaohua He2, Jun Lin1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA. 2. Taiho Oncology, Inc. Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pectoral Nerve (PECs) block is a fascial plane block first described by Blanco et al. for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery. The procedure is now widely used, and several small clinical trials have been published and reported favorably on the analgesic efficacy of PECs block. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we will summarize the current evidence on the efficacy of PECs block. METHODS: We identified and analyzed 19 randomized control trials from PubMed, Central, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science citation index, US clinical trials register and Google Scholar. The primary outcome was 24-hour opioid requirement, and secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting and other complications. RESULTS: Compared to systemic analgesia, PECs block was associated with reduced 24 hours opioid requirement [mean difference (MD) = -10.66 mg], lower pain score [9-12 hours postoperatively: MD = -1.18; 24 hours postoperatively: MD = -0.79] and less frequent PONV [risk ratio (RR) = 0.37, numbers needed to treat (NNT) = 5]. While the failure rate of PECs block was not well defined, several studies reported significant intraoperative opioid requirement despite PECs block. Lastly, trial sequential analysis indicated that no more clinical trials are needed to demonstrate the opioid sparing effect of PECs block. CONCLUSION: When compared to general anesthesia with systemic opioids, PECs block was associated with significantly better perioperative pain control. There are currently insufficient data on the complication and failure rate of PECs block in clinical practice. IJPPP
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pectoral Nerve (PECs) block is a fascial plane block first described by Blanco et al. for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery. The procedure is now widely used, and several small clinical trials have been published and reported favorably on the analgesic efficacy of PECs block. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we will summarize the current evidence on the efficacy of PECs block. METHODS: We identified and analyzed 19 randomized control trials from PubMed, Central, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science citation index, US clinical trials register and Google Scholar. The primary outcome was 24-hour opioid requirement, and secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting and other complications. RESULTS: Compared to systemic analgesia, PECs block was associated with reduced 24 hours opioid requirement [mean difference (MD) = -10.66 mg], lower pain score [9-12 hours postoperatively: MD = -1.18; 24 hours postoperatively: MD = -0.79] and less frequent PONV [risk ratio (RR) = 0.37, numbers needed to treat (NNT) = 5]. While the failure rate of PECs block was not well defined, several studies reported significant intraoperative opioid requirement despite PECs block. Lastly, trial sequential analysis indicated that no more clinical trials are needed to demonstrate the opioid sparing effect of PECs block. CONCLUSION: When compared to general anesthesia with systemic opioids, PECs block was associated with significantly better perioperative pain control. There are currently insufficient data on the complication and failure rate of PECs block in clinical practice. IJPPP
Authors: Julian P T Higgins; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Peter Jüni; David Moher; Andrew D Oxman; Jelena Savovic; Kenneth F Schulz; Laura Weeks; Jonathan A C Sterne Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-10-18
Authors: Tjokorda Gde Agung Senapathi; I Made Gede Widnyana; I Gusti Ngurah Mahaalit Aribawa; A A Gde Putra Semara Jaya; I Made Darma Junaedi Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2019-04-26 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Diego Daniel Pereira; Helena Bleeker; Claudia Malic; Nicholas Barrowman; Anna Shadrina Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2021-06-03 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Alberto E Ardon; John E George; Kapil Gupta; Michael J O'Rourke; Melinda S Seering; Hanae K Tokita; Sylvia H Wilson; Tracy-Ann Moo; Ingrid Lizarraga; Sarah McLaughlin; Roy A Greengrass Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Alberto E Ardon; John E George; Kapil Gupta; Michael J O'Rourke; Melinda S Seering; Hanae K Tokita; Sylvia H Wilson; Tracy-Ann Moo; Ingrid Lizarraga; Sarah McLaughlin; Roy A Greengrass Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-04-12 Impact factor: 4.339