| Literature DB >> 32210990 |
Huan Wang1, Dandan Zhao1,2, Liang Chen1,3, John P Giesy4,5, Weizhen Zhang1,6, Changbo Yuan1, Leyi Ni1, Hong Shen1, Ping Xie1,7.
Abstract
Information on temporal dynamics of phytoplankton communities and their responses to environmental factors can provide insights into mechanisms driving succession of phytoplankton communities that is useful in programs to manage and or remediate undesirable assemblages. Populations of phytoplankton can be controlled by bottom-up factors such as nutrients and temperature or top-down such as predation by zooplankton. Traditionally, taxonomic diversity based on morphologies has been the measure used for analysis of responses to environmental factors. Recently, according to functional groupings, including functional groups (FG), morpho-FG (MFG), and morphology-based FG (MBFG), functional diversity has been used to represent functional aspects of phytoplankton communities. However, to what extent these taxonomic and functional groupings are congruent at seasonal time-scales and the main environmental factors, which drive succession, have remained less studied. Here, we analyzed absolute and relative proportions of a phytoplankton community during a 3-year period in Lake Erhai, a eutrophic highland lake in China. Alpha diversity and beta diversity, as measured by Shannon-Wiener and Bray-Curtis indices of taxonomic grouping and three functional groupings (FG, MFG, and MBFG) were applied to investigate environmental factors determining diversity. Significant, positive relationships were observed between taxonomic diversity and functional diversity that were strongly linked through seasons. In order to exclude the influence of dominant species' tolerance to extreme environments, the dominant species were excluded one by one, and the results showed that residual communities still exhibited similar patterns of succession. This synchronous temporal pattern was not principally driven by the dominant genera (Microcystis, Psephonema, and Mougeotia). Instead, the entire phytoplankton community assemblages were important in the pattern. Most diversity indices of taxonomic and functional groupings were significantly correlated with solar irradiance, but not nutrient concentrations. Because the lake is eutrophic and there were already sufficient nutrients available, additional nutrients had little effect on seasonal taxonomic and functional diversity of phytoplankton in Lake Erhai.Entities:
Keywords: algal taxonomic and functional groupings; alpha and beta diversity; environmental drivers; eutrophication; seasonal succession
Year: 2020 PMID: 32210990 PMCID: PMC7067047 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00179
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Comparisons of taxonomic and three functional groupings, including functional groups (FG), morpho-FG (MFG), and morphology-based FG (MBFG).
| Taxonomic and functional groupings | Number of groups | Main grouping | Principle of subdivision | Applied Cases |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Not Applicable | Phylogenetic characteristics | Size, population/single cell, color, structure and other features that can be observed under a microscope |
|
|
| 39 | Habitat, tolerances and sensitivities | Nutrient levels, water depth, salt and fresh water, scour, stratification, pH, transparency, light intensity and grazing |
|
|
| 11 categories and 32 subcategories | Morphological and functional characteristics | size and form, mobility, potential mixotrophy, nutrient requirements, presence of gelatinous envelopes |
|
|
| 7 | Morphological and structural characteristics | Size, flagella, siliceous structures, mucilage, aerotopes and surface/volume ratio |
|
Figure 1Map of Lake Erhai and the location of the 15 sampling sites.
Figure 2Monthly time series of values of physical and chemical parameters in Lake Erhai from January 2012 to December 2014. (A) ammonium (NH4-N), (B) Secchi depth (SD), (C) dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP), and (D) water temperature (T). Values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) among the 15 sites for each month. To detect the seasonality of environmental parameters, a locally weighted scatter smoothing function (Cleveland, 1981) was used to fit a smooth curve (span = 0.75) using month as the predictor variable.
Figure 3Seasonal composition and successions of phytoplankton in Lake Erhai from January 2012 to December 2014 according to taxonomic and three functional groupings. (A) Cell density and composition, (B) alpha diversity (Shannon-Wiener diversity) indices, (C) beta diversity (Bray-Curtis dissimilarity) indices, (D) pair plot for linear fitting of alpha and (E) beta diversity. The order from left to right is genus, functional groups (FG), morpho-FG (MFG), and morphology-based FG (MBFG). The cell density values are presented as the mean of 15 sites for each month. Alpha and beta diversity values are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) among the 15 sites for each month. To detect the seasonality of alpha and beta diversity indices, a locally weighted scatter smoothing function (Cleveland, 1981) was used to fit a smooth curve (span = 0.75) using month as the predictor variable. The numbers in the lower left columns in (d) and (e) are correlation coefficients (R2) (p < 0.05).
Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) results for environmental factors and diversity indices of taxonomic and three functional groupings, including functional groups (FG), morpho-FG (MFG), and morphology-based FG (MBFG).
| Group | (Intercept) | Ammonium | Phosphorus | Secchi depth | Water temperature | rvalue | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha diversity (Shannon-Wiener index) | Genus | 0.851 | 0.65 | 0.652 |
| 0.226 | 0.244 |
| FG | 0.668 | 0.723 | 0.7 |
| 0.115 | 0.322 | |
| MFG | 0.847 | 0.563 | 0.473 | 0.082 | 0.311 | 0.15 | |
| MBFG | 0.409 | 0.615 | 0.771 | 0.1 | 0.251 | 0.122 | |
| Beta diversity (Bray-Curtis index) | Genus | 0.173 | 0.161 | 0.098 |
| 0.053 | 0.357 |
| FG | 0.156 | 0.192 | 0.112 |
|
| 0.346 | |
| MFG | 0.183 | 0.121 | 0.073 |
| 0.051 | 0.334 | |
| MBFG | 0.246 | 0.143 | 0.131 |
| 0.053 | 0.255 |
The bolded numbers showed correlation coefficients (R2) with statistical significance (p < 0.05).