Literature DB >> 32210733

Transcription Factor RREB1: from Target Genes towards Biological Functions.

Ya-Nan Deng1, Zijing Xia1,2, Peng Zhang3, Samina Ejaz4, Shufang Liang1.   

Abstract

The Ras-responsive element binding protein 1(RREB1) is a member of zinc finger transcription factors, which is widely involved in biological processes including cell proliferation, transcriptional regulation and DNA damage repair. New findings reveal RREB1 functions as both transcriptional repressors and transcriptional activators for transcriptional regulation of target genes. The activation of RREB1 is regulated by MAPK pathway. We have summarized the target genes of RREB1 and discussed RREB1 roles in the cancer development. In addition, increasing evidences suggest that RREB1 is a potential risk gene for type 2 diabetes and obesity. We also review the current clinical application of RREB1 as a biomarker for melanoma detection. In conclusion, RREB1 is a promising diagnostic biomarker or new drug target for cancers and metabolic diseases. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  MAPK pathway; RREB1; cancer; metabolic disease

Year:  2020        PMID: 32210733      PMCID: PMC7085234          DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.40834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1449-2288            Impact factor:   6.580


Introduction

Zinc finger transcription factors are widely involved in biological processes and play crucial roles in the maintenance of cell activities. RREB1, also known as HNT, FINB and LZ321, is a zinc finger transcription factor that is originally identified as a transcriptional activator of calcitonin in response to Ras signaling. The first isoform of RREB1 encodes 755 amino acids and contains four tandem C2H2-type zinc fingers 1. Latter, the finger protein in nuclear bodies (Finb), a longer version of RREB1, is cloned from the cDNA library of breast cancer, which encodes 1656 amino acids with 15 C2H2-type zinc fingers. By now, five RREB1 isoforms RREB1 α, RREB1 β, RREB1 γ, RREB1 δ and RREB1ε are identified. RREB1 is widely expressed in various human tissues except brain tissue, and it shows relatively higher expression in HeLa and MDA-MB 453 cells among multiple cancer cell lines. RREB1 is mainly located in nuclear body, while its truncated forms have different cell locations. For instance, the truncated variant without 1-974 amino acids locates throughout the nucleus and cytoplasm. While the variant without 1-1407 amino acids only appears in the nucleus and no signal is detected in cytoplasm 2. These evidences suggest a complex mechanism in RREB1 localization. Usually the post-translational modifications (PTMs) are involved in modulation on the activity of transcription factors. The acetylation of RREB1 was reported to be associated with the gene expression, for example HLA-G 3. Moreover, RREB1 is also predicted to be phosphorylated by ERK 1, suggesting that the phosphorylation may play a role in transcription activity of RREB1. Recently, increasing evidences indicate RREB1 is involved in various biological processes, such as DNA damage repair 4, cell growth and proliferation 5, cell differentiation 1, fat development 6, fasting glucose balance 7, zinc transport 8 and transcriptional regulation. An imbalance of RREB1 function plays a role in the development of various cancers and other diseases including prostate cancer 9, colorectal cancer 5,10, urologic cancer 11, type 2 diabetes 12, leukemia 13 and intervertebral disc degeneration 14. Correspondingly, RREB1 isoforms exhibit different effects on cell growth and proliferation. RREB1β seems to have a more important role than RREB1α in promoting cell growth in UMUC-3 cells 11. Given that the correlation of RREB1 with the development of various diseases, there is a great possibility to make it a potent disease marker or drug target. The overexpression of RREB1 is correlated with poor survival rate in human Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL). In contrast, knockdown of RREB1 inhibits proliferation of DB and Pfeiffer cells 15. RREB1 is also overexpressed in pancreatic cancer compared with normal tissue. Targeting RREB1 expression with RNA interfering in vitro and in vivo will reduce tumor cell growth of pancreatic cancer 16. RREB1 functions in most cases as a transcription factor to regulate the transcription of target genes. In colorectal cancer, microRNA-143/145 10 and ITGA7 5 are the target genes regulated by RREB1. In intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), RREB1 has been reported to inhibit the expression of ADAMTS5 14. Importantly, these RREB1-targeting genes have been effective drug targets for diseases treatment. These evidences indicate that designing small molecules to target RREB1 and RREB1-regulated genes is feasible for new drug discovery. In general, more and more evidences show RREB1 is important for cancer occurrence and other diseases. Our review focuses on RREB1-involved signaling pathways, the target genes regulated by RREB1, the role of RREB1 in cancer and disease development and the clinical application of RREB1, which is helpful for comprehensive understanding RREB1 multiple functions in physiological and pathological states.

RREB1 is a downstream effector of MAPK signaling pathway

Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling comprises several protein kinases including receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), Ras, Raf, MEK and ERK. Aberrant activation of MAPK signaling pathway has been identified in many cancers leading to enhanced survival and metastasis of cancer cells. Among mutations of MAPK signaling pathway, Ras and Raf mutations are the most common ones conferring to cancer cell resistance to chemotherapy or target drug therapy. For example, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) showed a highly prevalent mutation approximately with 25% of all human cancers. RREB1 is confirmed to be a downstream effector of MAPK signaling pathway (Figure 1). The Ras-induced cellular differentiation is characterized by upregulation of the calcitonin (CT) gene. RREB1 binds to the RREs within the promoter of CT gene and activates CT gene. Overexpressing RREB1 increases the expression of CT gene during Ras- or Raf-induced cellular differentiation, which indicates RREB1 is a downstream effector of Ras signaling pathway 1. On the other hand, the activation of RREB1 is dependent on the cascade activation of Ras-Raf-MEK-MAPK pathway. In a transactivation activity test of RREB1/LZ321, transfection of RREB1 alone does not activate the transcription of p321F promoter in H4IIE-C3 cells. In contrast, cotransfection of RREB1 with Raf elevates 4-fold transcription of p321F promoter in H4IIE-C3 cells. This study validates previous finding that Raf activation is required for the activation of RREB1 17. In the Ras-Raf-MEK-MAPK cascade, the activation of MEK is sufficient for the activation of RREB1 18. Another independent study has also supported this hypothesis that RREB1 activation requires phosphorylation downstream of the MAPK pathway. Blocking the MEK activity with U0126 in HPNE-Kras G12D cells induces a decrease of RREB1 mRNA. However, the mRNA level of RREB1 has no change when these cells are treated with AKT inhibitor LY294002. Furthermore, a predicted phosphorylation site within RREB1 has been identified as a substrate of MAPK/ERK1 in two independent groups 1,10.
Figure 1

RREB1-involved in MAPK signaling pathway. MAPK signaling pathway includes several core members Ras, Raf, MEK1/2 and Erk1/2. Extracellular stimuli activate the MAPK cascade and subsequently the activated Erk1/2 phosphorylates RREB1 to mediate its transcriptional activity. This process will be blocked by MEK1/2 inhibitor U0126. MiR-143 and miR-145 act as tumor suppressor in the pancreatic cancer and colorectal cancer by targeting MAPK signaling pathway. The activated RREB1 binds to RRE in the promoter of miR-143 and miR-145 and inhibits the transcription of miR-143 and miR-145 to remove the inhibition.

In addition to being an effector of the Ras signaling pathway, RREB1 is also able to regulate the Ras signaling pathway through repressing miR-143/145 that have been identified as repressor of Ras signaling pathway via targeting genes in Ras pathway including ERK1, ERK5, HGK, JNKK, MEKK, KRAS and RREB1 10. Colorectal cancer cells harboring KRAS or BRAF mutation show a higher expression of RREB1 compared with tissue samples without KRAS or BRAF mutation 10. In addition, RREB1 is also activated by other members of Ras family, such as Ras like proto-oncogene A (RalA) and Ras like proto-oncogene B (RalB) 19.

Target genes regulated by RREB1

RREB1 regulates target genes as a transcriptional activator

RREB1 is also involved in various physiological pathways via activating corresponding genes. RREB1 mediates the secretion regulation of two hormones, secretin and cholecystokinin (CCK). RREB1 interacts with BETA2/NeuroD to promote the transcription of secretin gene 20. Give that lacking an intrinsic domain to independently activate the secretin gene RREB1 exerts its transcriptional promotion through cooperating with other regulatory factors. RREB1 recognizes and directly binds to the Ras-responsive element (RRE) followed by recruitment of DJ-1 to the promoter to fully activate the CCK transcription in a dose-dependent manner 21. Moreover, the expression of SAMD9L was regulated by calcitonin. RREB1 also promotes the expression of SAMD9L, a Murine paralogue of human SAMD9, by binding to the 87 bp sequences upstream of SAMD9L transcription start site 22. In addition, RREB1 is involved in the regulation of insulin production in pancreatic cells. Insulin is responsible for the downregulation of glucose level in blood. NeuroD1 is originally identified as a direct activator of insulin I and insulin II in pancreatic cells 23, 24. RREB1 and NeuroD1 are also identified to occupy the promoter of insulin I and insulin II in pancreatic beta cells, implicating a role of RREB1 in insulin gene regulation. It is noticeable that the epigenetic modification plays a crucial role in RREB1-mediated insulin expression. Mechanistically, RREB1 recruits the H3K9 demethylase LSD1 to remove methyl marks from H3K9Me2. NeuroD1 recruit histone acetyltransferase PCAF to facilitate the acetylation of H3K9 to promote the transcriptional activation of insulin genes. It is also reported that RREB1 is involved in the regulation of DNA damage response. Under UV condition, RREB1 binds to p53 promotor via interacting with p53 core promoter element (CPE-p53) and promotes the expression of p53. In contrast, silencing RREB1 with RNAi reduces the expression of p53 and p53 target genes, leading to the impairment of p53-meideated protection effect 4. RREB1 also binds with other gene's regulation region such as the promotor to mediate gene transcription. For instance, Finb/RREB1 is able to bind to the promoter of c-erbB-2, but Finb/RREB1 alone is unable to activate the transcription of c-erbB-2 in COS cells 2. On the contrary, the thymidine kinase (TK) minimal promoter and human metallothionein-IIA (MT-IIA) promoter are efficiently activated by Finb/RREB1. These evidences indicate that RREB1 regulates different target genes in different manners.

RREB1 regulates target genes as a transcriptional repressor

A corepressor complex identification by mass spectrometry reveals that RREB1 is a component of CtBP corepressor complex, suggesting that RREB1 may function as a transcriptional repressor 25,26. To date, more than 20 target genes of RREB1 are identified, of which 11 genes are inhibited under different conditions. RREB1 participates in a variety of diseases and biological processes by inhibiting gene expression. RREB1 has been reported to regulate renin-angiotensin system by inhibiting hANG 27 and to participate in the intervertebral disc degeneration protection by inhibiting the expression of ADAMTS5. RREB1 is also involved in the regulation of prostate cancer development by inhibiting hZIP1. Moreover, anti-tumor immunity/immune tolerance was also regulated by RREB1 through targeting HLA-G. In addition, RREB1 participates in the embryonic development regulation by silencing zeta-globin. RREB1 suppresses most of these target genes via a direct binding to the DNA sequence of target gene promoter, except for PSA gene. RREB1 does not bind to the promoter of PSA in the absence of androgen receptor (AR) 9. The binding sequences in the promoter of most of these target genes are in accordance with the pattern of consensus sequence, but each of them is not identical. Moreover, a minor variation in the binding sequence will obviously change the affinity between RREB1 and target sequence. For example, p16INK4a is a known tumor repressor in several cancers by binding to and inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6(CDK4/6). The variant of coding region of p16INK4a has been linked to the development of cancers. A recent study indicated that a mutation at regulatory region of p16INK4a is responsible for the development of pristine-induced plasma cell tumors in BALB/c mice. In detail, an 'A' deletion at -32 generates a consensus binding sequence CCCCACACCATCCT and improves the affinity at least four times for RREB1. Luciferase reporter assay suggests that RREB1 plays as a transcription repressor and consequently inhibits the expression of p16 gene. Decreased expression of p16INK4a results in more susceptible to the pristane-induced plasma cell tumors in BALB/c mice than DBA/2 mice 18. In addition, RREB1/LZ321 has been reported to bind to GGTCCT that differs from RRE (5'-CCCCACCATCCCC) and consensus binding site (5'-CCCCAAACCACCCC). LZ321 is cloned from human liver cDNA and is identical to RREB1 in the overlapped region. Although RREB1/LZ321 shows a similar affinity with binding to GGTCCT-containing ligand and RRE, GGTCCT-containing element is identified to function as an enhancer. The binding site diversity of RREB1 lays the foundation of target gene diversity and biological function diversity. The role of RREB1 in the zinc uptake is cancer specific. Mentioned above, RREB1 plays a positive role in pancreatic cancer by promoting the expression of ZIP3. However, RREB1 plays a negative role in prostate cancer by binding to the ACCCAAACTTACCC sequence of hZIP1. Mutating ACCCAAACTTACCC into ACCTGAACTTGTCC is sufficient to disrupt the repressive effect of RREB1 on hZIP1 8. Embryonic zeta-globin genes show a high expression level at early embryonic stage and then are switched off during erythroid development. RREB1 is involved in this transformation via directly binding to the promoter of zeta-globin genes. The increased expression of RREB1 in mature erythroid cell inhibits the expression of zeta-globin genes. Knockdown of RREB1 with RNA interference increases the expression of zeta-globin gene in the human erythroid K562 cell line and primary erythroid culture 13. Therefore, RREB1 is a regulator for zeta-globin gene. In conclusion, RREB1 functions both transcriptional activator and repressor (Table 1), and its role in target gene regulation may depend on its binding partner and the status of epigenetic modifications. The zinc finger domain allows RREB1 to bind the Ras-responsive element in promoter. Transfecting RREB1 alone is not sufficient to activate or inhibit the expression of some genes. Therefore, uncovering the determinant mechanism of RREB1 transcriptional role is a future direction for researchers.
Table 1

Target gene of RREB1 in cancers and diseases

Potential roleTarget geneCancer or diseaseBinding sequenceRef
activatorCalcitoninhuman medullary thyroid cancer cell line TTCCCCAAACCACCCC1
activatorTK,2
MT-IIA,
TTK17
activatorP53AAAACCCCAATCCCATCAACCCCTC4
activatorSecretin,intestinal and pancreatic endocrine cells20
ß-glucokinase,
insulin I,
insulin II
activatorAGAP2-AS1pancreatic cancer16
activatorZIP3pancreatic cancer32
activatorSAMD9L22
activatorCCKCCCCAACCCCCCCA21
activatorUcp1brownadipocytes58
Cidea
repressorp16 INK4aBAL B/C miceCCCCACACCATCCT18
repressorhANGGGATGG-like27
repressorPSAprostate cancer9
repressorHLA-GGGTCCT3
repressorzeta -Globin Geneerythroidcell lines13
repressormiR-143/145pancreatic cancersAnd colorectal cancer10,33
repressorhZIP1Prostate cancer8
repressorARHGEF2pancreatic cancer29
repressorADAMTS5nuclearpulposus(NP) cells14
repressorITGA7Colorectal cancer5
repressorPTPRGchildhood acute lymphoblastic leukemias77

The post-translational modifications of RREB1

As we discussed above, RREB1 acts downstream of MAPK signaling pathway and its phosphorylation by ERK may affect its transcriptional activity. Besides phosphorylation, other PTMs, such as acetylation and sumoylation, are widely reported to regulate the activity of transcription factors. The acetylation of RREB1 has been associated with the expression of HLA-G. Acetylated RREB1 will decrease the recruitment of HDAC1 and CtBP1/2 into CtBP repressor complex, which provides a chromatinized environment which allows for recruitment of RNA polymerase II on the transcription start site of HLA-G gene in JEG-3 cells. In contrast, reduced acetylation of RREB1 in M8 cells will enhance the interaction with HDAC1 and CtBP1/2 to inhibit transcription of HLA-G gene 3. Sumoylation is also an important modification involved in transcription activity regulation. Analyzing the component of CtBP repressor complex provides another possibility that RREB1 may be modified by sumoylation. Kuppuswamy et al identified ubc9 as a core constituent of the CtBP1 complex, and this complex provides a platform for sumoylation of ZEB1. Similar with ZEB1, RREB1 also functions as a sequence-specific DNA binding repressor in this complex. However, whether RREB1 can be sumoylated through CtBP1 complex is not investigated 28.

RREB1-mediated activation or inhibition in tumorigenesis

Pancreatic cancer

The functional role of RREB1 in pancreatic cancer is still controversial due to multiple mechanisms involvement. RREB1 has been identified a negative regulator of RHO guanine exchange factor ARHGEF2 that is essential for the growth and survival of pancreatic cancer. Relieving the negative regulation of RREB1 on ARHGEF2 contributes to the migratory behavior of pancreatic cancer cells 29. On the other hand, the low level of zinc is crucial to survival of pancreatic cancer cells, and RREB1 inhibits the proliferation of pancreatic cancer through upregulating the zinc level. Meanwhile, the RREB1 transcription factor and ZIP3 zinc uptake transporter were downregulated, leading to the progression of pancreatic cancer. This conclusion is consistent with previous observation that RREB1 is a positive regulator of ZIP3 zinc uptake transporter 30-32. Studies also propose that RREB1 is an oncogene to promote the phenotype transformation in pancreatic cancer. Bingqing Hui et al 16 reported that RREB1 upregulates the expression of lncRNA AGAP2-AS1 and promotes the proliferation and metastasis in pancreatic cancer through inhibiting the expression of ANKRD1 and ANGPTL4. RREB1 is also involved in the KRAS-induced transformation of pancreatic cancer via repressing the tumor suppressor miR-143/145. In turn, miR-143/145 is capable of repressing RREB1, generating a feed-back mechanism in the KRAS signaling pathway 33. Subsequent studies validated that restoration of miR-143 34 or miR-145 35 retard the transformation of pancreatic cancer at least partly through downregulation of KRAS and RREB1.

Prostate cancer

Although there are few reports about RREB1 in prostate cancer, RREB1 is indeed involved in the development of prostate cancer. Nishit K. Mukhopadhyay et al 9 first reported a correlation between RREB1 and prostate cancer. Androgen receptor (AR) is a crucial oncogenic factor in the development of prostate cancer. RREB1 physically interactions with androgen receptor (AR) and binds to the promoter of PSA to inhibit the expression of PSA. This inhibitory effect can be abolished by N-17-Ras or MAPK kinase inhibitor PD98059, which is consistent with the conclusion that RREB1 phosphorylation is MAPK pathway dependent. Additionally, RREB1 has been reported to downregulate the zinc level in prostate cancer through inhibiting the hZIP1 zinc transporter. Immunohistochemistry with tissue microarrays (TMA) and tissue sections shows an inverse relationship between RREB-1 and hZIP1 8. Expression of RREB1 is significantly increased in prostate cancer tissue. Overexpressed RREB1 decreases the zinc level to provide a microenvironment for the growth of prostate cancer cells. These findings support that RREB1 exerts oncogenic promotion in prostate cancer through different pathways.

Colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a common digestive tract malignancy with increasing morbidity in younger people 36. The etiology of colorectal cancer remains largely unknown. RREB1 has been implicated a potential oncogene in colorectal cancer. Oncomine database and immunohistochemistry (IHC) reveal that RREB1 is overexpressed in colorectal cancer tissues compared with normal colon tissues 10. The RREB1 mRNA exhibits 3- to 20-fold higher in colorectal cancer cells harboring active KRAS than that in normal colon tissues. Moreover, the expression of RREB1 shows an inverse relationship with miR-143 and miR-145, two known suppressors of colorectal cancer 37, 38. RREB1 is activated by MAPK pathway and RREB1 activation inhibits the transcription of miR-143/145 by binding to two RREs within its promoter. In turn, overexpression of miR-143/145 represses MAPK pathway through downregulating several targets including KRAS and RREB1. Besides miR-143/145, RREB1 is also regulated by other tumor suppressor, such as a lncRNA circITGA7. It represses the expression of RREB1 via Ras pathway to inhibit growth and metastasis of colorectal cancer. In turn, overexpression of RREB1 will block the inhibitory effect of circITGA7 on Ras pathway by inhibiting ITGA7 to promote colorectal cancer 5 (Figure 2).
Figure 2

RREB1 regulates different target genes in different cancers. RREB1 exhibits multiple mechanisms of action in the development of cancer. Even for the same cancer, RREB1 has different target gene, and different target genes also play different roles in the development of cancer, such as AGAP2-AS1and ZIP3 in prostate cancer. RREB1 promotes the development of colorectal cancer through relieving the inhibition of MAPK pathway by miR-143/145 and circITGA7. Detaching from AR/RREB1 complex, RREB1 restores the expression of PSA.

Melanoma

Frequent amplification of RREB1 in melanoma suggests us the important role of RREB1 in the tumorigenesis of melanoma. As a downstream effector of MAPK signaling pathway, RREB1 inhibits the expression of several tumor suppressors including p53, p16INK4a and miR-143/145 39. Therefore, RREB1 may be a crucial driver-gene to initiate the melanoma by inhibiting tumor suppressors. Another research also supports this hypothesis. Rand et al reported two cases with atypical ALK-positive Spitz tumor in which both exhibited a lack of p16 immunoreactivity and gain of 6p25(RREB1) 40 .

Pathogenicity of RREB1 in metabolic diseases

RREB1 is a potential risk gene for type 2 diabetes

The type 2 diabetes (T2D) is an integrated and multifactorial metabolic disorder that is characterized by insulin resistance and reduced secretion of insulin from pancreatic beta cells 41. Besides age, sex, obesity, low physical activity and a family history of diabetes, many genetic variants contribute to the risk of T2D. With the development of genetic high-resolution technologies, 128 susceptibility genetic markers of T2D have been identified. Genome-wide association studies have demonstrated that some loci associated with the dysregulation of fasting glucose are also the risk alleles for the development of T2D 42,43. In recent several studies, the correlation among RREB1, fasting glucose and T2D has been established. The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of RREB1 may be indicators for T2D (Table 2).
Table 2

SNPs of RREB1 which are associated with type 2 diabetes and fasting glucose

SNPAmino acid alterationAssociated phenotypes….populationRef
rs3099797intron_variantT2DMexican-Americans45
rs9379084p.Asp1171AsnT2DRussian46
rs9505118intron_variantT2DEuropean, East Asian, South Asian, and Mexican andMexican American ancestry12
rs9505118intron_variantT2D(not significant)Danish47
rs35742417p.Ser1499Tyrfasting glucosenon-diabetic individuals of European ancestry44
rs17762454intron_variantfasting glucoseEuropean ancestrywithout diabetes7
Although genetic genes regulating glycemic trait are not necessarily identical to those leading to the conversion to type 2 diabetes, RREB1 is a risk gene responsible for both fasting glucose and T2D. Two SNPs in RREB1 have been linked to the glycemic trait. A recent meta-analysis of GWAS including 133,010 nondiabetic individuals of European ancestry revealed that the rs17762454 in RREB1 is associated with fasting glucose (p<5×10-8), but not with fasting insulin and T2D 7. In another GWAS, rare mutation rs35742417 in RREB1 shows a significant association with fasting glucose 44. An intronic mutation rs3099797 in RREB1 has been identified as a candidate risk allele for T2D in Starr County Mexican-Americans 45. In another Russian population based investigation, a coding region SNP rs9379084 (p. Asp1171Asn) in RREB1 shows strong association with T2D (p = 0.042) 46. In 2014, a Genome-wide trans-ancestry meta-analyses containing populations from European, East Asian, South Asian, and Mexican and Mexican American ancestry discovered seven novel T2D susceptibility loci, and rs9505118 in RREB1 is one of them (p=1.4×10-9) 12. However, rs9505118 did not achieve a significant level in a subsequent Danish population-based validation study 47. In a subsequent fine-mapping analysis, researchers aggregated coding variant in a larger sample size and they found that the coding variant rs9379084 is the driver factor for the T2D association signal 48, 49. However, another two SNPs of RREB1, rs35742417 (p.Ser1499Tyr) and rs9505118 are excluded. In addition, there are several indirect evidences to support the association of RREB1 with T2D. CDKN2A has been correlated with T2D in GWAS studies. It is reported that the expression of CDNK2A is regulated by RREB1. Furthermore, RREB1 also directly promotes the expression of insulin genes. In conclusion, these evidences suggest that RREB1 shows a strong correlation with T2D, though the exact mechanism remains unclear.

RREB1 is a potential risk factor for gestational diabetes mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a complication of pregnancy with increasing prevalence in the world, characterized by glucose intolerance and insulin resistance 50. Similar to T2D, GDM is also influenced by environmental and genetic factors. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that part of susceptibility genes of T2D are casual factors for GDM 51. Two groups have linked T2D risk SNPs rs9505118 and rs9379084 to GDM. Selecting from 45 SNPs of T2D, Kasuga et al has identified three genetic variants including rs9505118 in SSR1-RREB1 as risk SNP of GDM in Japanese population 52. Another case-control study containing 2636 women with GDM and 6086 non-GDM control women identified eight genetic variants that were significantly associated with GDM, and rs9379084 in RREB1 was the one of eight genetic variants. However, a recent GDM study in Asian Indian population showed that RREB1 is excluded from the list of risk genes at least in this population, which suggests that different population may harbor their own specific risk genes for GDM 53. Understanding the underlying mechanism of GDM is important for the health of offspring of mothers with GDM. It has been reported that the mothers with GDM increased the risk of developing T2D in their offspring 54. Exposure to hyperglycemia during pregnancy may induce changes in DNA methylation 55. A recent study of siblings revealed that intrauterine exposure to maternal gestational diabetes will significantly increase the methylation of RREB1 in offspring compared to non-GDM groups 56. Although there is no experimental evidence to elucidate the exact role of RREB1 in the development of GDM, we need to note that RREB1 has been associated with fasting glucose and T2D.

RREB1 is involved in fat development and distribution

Recent GWAS studies identified RREB1 as a candidate gene for fat development and distribution. A report demonstrates that rs6931262 at RREB1 has a significant association with body fat distribution in African ancestry population (p=2.48×10-8) 57. In a multiehnic meta-analysis of up to 18332 participants from European, African, Hispanic and Chinese ancestry, another variation rs2842895 in RREB1 is associated with visceral adipose tissue(VAT) (p = 1.1 × 10-8), but not with pericardial adipose tissue (PAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). However, subsequent functional studies demonstrate that RREB1 is not differentially expressed in these three tissues and do not differ in response to the obesogenic stimulus and in adipogenic induction 6. In addition, RREB1 is indeed involved in the brown fat (BAT) development. RREB1 selectively binds to H3K27me3 marked promoter of BAT-selective genes, such as Ucp1 and Cidea, and recruits Jmjd3 to remove the H3K27me3, leading to the expression of BAT-selective genes. Furthermore, the expression of RREB1 is much higher in brown fat tissues and white fat tissues. RREB1 is strongly elevated during brown adipogenesis, but knockdown of RREB1 has no effect on brown adipogenesis 58. In total, RREB1 and RREB1-meidated histone modification play an important role in fat development and distribution.

RREB1 is a potential drug target for diseases treatment

RREB1 is widely involved in the development of tumorigenesis and metabolic diseases by regulating various target genes. Suppression of RREB1 with inhibitors will reverse the effects of target genes on the diseases progression. Although no small molecule compounds targeting RREB1 have been reported by now, there are many studies on RREB1 target genes for drug development. In pancreatic and colorectal cancer, RREB1 overexpression will promote cancer cell proliferation through the inhibition of tumor suppressor miR-143/145. Actually, restore of miR-143/145 will reduce tumor growth. In fact, using lipid-based nanoparticle (nanovector) to deliver the tumor suppressor "TSG-miRs" miR-34a or miR-143/145 to MiaPaCa-2 indeed inhibits the pancreatic tumor growth 59. MiR-143/145 replacement therapy was also reported in colorectal cancer. Chemical-modified miR-143 improved its activity and stability, leading to a significant suppressive effect on colorectal cancer in vitro and in vivo 60. Even delivering unmodified miR-145 with polyethylenimine (PEI) will reach the comparable suppressive effect on colorectal cancer 61. On the other hand, RREB1 inhibition by circITGA7 will increase the expression of ITGA7 to inhibit colorectal cancer growth 5. Therefore, targeting RREB1 with small molecule compounds will be a promising way for cancer therapy.

Diagnostic value of RREB1 in melanoma detection

Because RREB1 plays an important role in tumorigenesis, RREB1 is a good marker for tumor diagnosis, prognosis prediction and management of patients. At present, the clinical application of RREB1 is mainly used as a molecular diagnostic marker for melanoma. Accurate classification of melanocytic tumors as benign or malignant is crucial for patient diagnosis and treatment. The routine method for melanoma detection is histopathological detection. However, it is hard to distinguish melanocytic tumors sharing common features of nevi and melanoma through conventional morphological features analysis. Previous studies have revealed that chromosomal aberrations frequently occurred in melanomas, but not in benign nevi 62, 63. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) demonstrates that melanoma harbors copy number gains of 1q, 4q, 6p, 7q, 8q, 11q, 17q and 20q, and frequent loss of 9p,10p,10q , 21q 64 and 6p 65. A subsequent study based on a training set of 301 tumors generates a panel of 6p25 (RREB1), 6q23 (MYB), Cep6, and 11q13 (CCND1) to distinguish melanoma and nevi, and this panel shows a sensitivity of 86.7% and specificity of 95.4% in the final validation sets 66. The usefulness of this panel is confirmed by other studies in different types of melanomas. For example, MOREY et al validated this panel in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanocytic tumors, reaching a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 95% 67. Another case in distinguishing BN-like cutaneous melanoma metastasis from conventional blue nevi or epithelioid blue nevi (EBN) also shows high sensitivity and specificity 68. In addition, the panel of 6p25 (RREB1), 6q23 (MYB), Cep6, and 11q13 (CCND1) do work in distinguishing nevoid melanoma from mitotically active nevi 69. However, the diagnostic capability of this panel varies greatly in different subtypes of melanomas. This panel is the most sensitive in the subgroups of nodular and acral melanomas and is the least sensitive in the superficial spreading subtype. It is of note that the role of RREB1 in melanoma diagnosis is particularly important. 6p25(RREB1) showed the most sensitive diagnosis of melanoma in overall cases as well as in each of different subtypes of melanomas, which revealed a strong correlation with melanomas. A higher sensitivity of gain in 6p25 (RREB1) compared to CEP6-related MYB loss, CCND1 gain and MYB gain was also observed in an evaluation of 50 melanocytic skin lesions 70.This is supported by another report. The patients with the gain of 6p where RREB1 locates in show a lower survival rate (33.3%) than those without the gain of 6p (92.9%), indicating that the gain of 6p may be a poor prognostic indicator 65. Despite the sensitivity of 4-color FISH in distinguishing melanoma from nevi, it is difficult to diagnose Spitz nevi due to its significant overlap with melanomas 71.To further improve the accuracy of diagnosis in morphologically ambiguous melanocytic neoplasms and Spitzoid neoplasms, Gerami et al proposes a new probe panel including 9p21 (CDKN2a), 6p25 (RREB1), 11q13 (CCND1) and 8q24 (MYC). The new probe set shows a higher sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 98% compared with the previous probe set that showed a sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 96% in the same validation data set, which improves the discriminatory power in distinguishing melanoma from nevi. They finally proposed a new solution that adding 9p21 (CDKN2a) into previous 4-probe FISH assay for spitzoid melanomas diagnosis. However, few studies are conducted with new probe set. Moreover, it is also a challenge for borderline melanocytic tumor (BMT) diagnosis 72.

Conclusion and perspective

As an effector of MAPK pathway, RREB1 is involved in cell growth, cell differentiation and DNA damage repair. RREB1 functions as both a transcriptional activator and a transcriptional repressor. The transcriptional activity of RREB1 is also dependent on its post-transcriptional modification, such as phosphorylation. In addition, acetylation may also be involved in the regulation of RREB1 activity. Analysis of the transcriptional repressor complex revealed that RREB1 can act together with deacetylase or demethylase to regulate transcription. It has been found that the interaction of RREB1 with different genes or different modifications of RREB1 may affect its transcriptional function, but the specific mechanism of action is still not fully explored. Though RREB1 exerts an oncogene or repressor gene in several cancers, the role of RREB1 in pancreatic cancer is still controversial. The indirect evidences indicate that RREB1-mediated immune mechanism may be involved in the regulation of cancer development. Considering a feedback among RREB1, miR-143/145 and KRAS, Zhou et al proposed a miR-143-meidated immune evasion in colorectal cancer. TGF-β 1 will elevate the expression of miR-155, and miR-155 decreases the expression of miR-143 by inhibiting CEBPB. Subsequently, the expression of B7-H3 and B7-H4 are augmented due to the release of miR-143 inhibitory effect. Overexpressed B7-H3 and B7-H4 induce T cells to secret TGF-β 1 and immunosuppressive cytokines IL-2, IL-6 and IL-17. Despite B7-H3 and B7-H4, other coinhibitory factor B7-DC, CTLA4 and PD-1 are also inhibited by miR-143 73. In addition, KRAS-mediated KAP1/TRIM28 sumoylation is also involved in the KRAS-driven transformation in colorectal cancer 74. The role of KAP1/TRIM28 in immunomodulatory has been widely reported 75,76. However, whether RREB1-mediated immunomodulatory is involved in cancer development is still to be investigated. RREB1 also plays an important role in the development of metabolic diseases, such as diabetes. Multiple SNPs in RREB1 are associated with the risk of developing diabetes. Therefore, RREB1 may also be one of the pathogenic genes of diabetes. And this is supported by recent new findings that insulin gene is a target of RREB1. RREB1 is associated with the regulation of fasting glucose. RREB1 also regulates the distribution and synthesis of fat. These evidences suggest that RREB1 plays an important role in diabetes, but the specific mechanism remains unclear. The importance of targeting RREB1 or downstream target genes is significant. The ectopic expression of RREB1 in diseases has been widely reported. Moreover, RREB1 always exerts its oncogenic role through regulating the expression of downstream target genes. Therefore, blocking RREB1 or its target genes is an efficient way for diseases treatment. In the future, with the deep research on RREB1, it will be possible to provide new potential therapeutic targets for cancers and metabolic diseases.
  77 in total

1.  Coordinated histone modifications mediated by a CtBP co-repressor complex.

Authors:  Yujiang Shi; Jun-ichi Sawada; Guangchao Sui; El Bachir Affar; Johnathan R Whetstine; Fei Lan; Hidesato Ogawa; Margaret Po-Shan Luke; Yoshihiro Nakatani; Yang Shi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A novel zinc finger protein, Finb, is a transcriptional activator and localized in nuclear bodies.

Authors:  A Fujimoto-Nishiyama; S Ishii; S Matsuda; J Inoue; T Yamamoto
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1997-08-22       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Jmjd3-Mediated H3K27me3 Dynamics Orchestrate Brown Fat Development and Regulate White Fat Plasticity.

Authors:  Dongning Pan; Lei Huang; Lihua J Zhu; Tie Zou; Jianhong Ou; William Zhou; Yong-Xu Wang
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 4.  The Growing Challenge of Young Adults With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin A Weinberg; John L Marshall; Mohamed E Salem
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.990

5.  Reduced accumulation of specific microRNAs in colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Michael Z Michael; Susan M O' Connor; Nicholas G van Holst Pellekaan; Graeme P Young; Robert J James
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.852

6.  The zinc finger protein ras-responsive element binding protein-1 is a coregulator of the androgen receptor: implications for the role of the Ras pathway in enhancing androgenic signaling in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nishit K Mukhopadhyay; Bekir Cinar; Lipi Mukhopadhyay; Mohini Lutchman; Angeline S Ferdinand; Jayoung Kim; Leland W K Chung; Rosalyn M Adam; Subir K Ray; Andrew B Leiter; Jerome P Richie; Brian C-S Liu; Michael R Freeman
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2007-06-05

7.  DNA damage signalling recruits RREB-1 to the p53 tumour suppressor promoter.

Authors:  Hanshao Liu; Hoi Chin Hew; Zheng-Guang Lu; Tomoko Yamaguchi; Yoshio Miki; Kiyotsugu Yoshida
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Large-scale association analyses identify new loci influencing glycemic traits and provide insight into the underlying biological pathways.

Authors:  Robert A Scott; Vasiliki Lagou; Ryan P Welch; Eleanor Wheeler; May E Montasser; Jian'an Luan; Reedik Mägi; Rona J Strawbridge; Emil Rehnberg; Stefan Gustafsson; Stavroula Kanoni; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Loïc Yengo; Cecile Lecoeur; Dmitry Shungin; Serena Sanna; Carlo Sidore; Paul C D Johnson; J Wouter Jukema; Toby Johnson; Anubha Mahajan; Niek Verweij; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Jouke-Jan Hottenga; Sonia Shah; Albert V Smith; Bengt Sennblad; Christian Gieger; Perttu Salo; Markus Perola; Nicholas J Timpson; David M Evans; Beate St Pourcain; Ying Wu; Jeanette S Andrews; Jennie Hui; Lawrence F Bielak; Wei Zhao; Momoko Horikoshi; Pau Navarro; Aaron Isaacs; Jeffrey R O'Connell; Kathleen Stirrups; Veronique Vitart; Caroline Hayward; Tõnu Esko; Evelin Mihailov; Ross M Fraser; Tove Fall; Benjamin F Voight; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Han Chen; Cecilia M Lindgren; Andrew P Morris; Nigel W Rayner; Neil Robertson; Denis Rybin; Ching-Ti Liu; Jacques S Beckmann; Sara M Willems; Peter S Chines; Anne U Jackson; Hyun Min Kang; Heather M Stringham; Kijoung Song; Toshiko Tanaka; John F Peden; Anuj Goel; Andrew A Hicks; Ping An; Martina Müller-Nurasyid; Anders Franco-Cereceda; Lasse Folkersen; Letizia Marullo; Hanneke Jansen; Albertine J Oldehinkel; Marcel Bruinenberg; James S Pankow; Kari E North; Nita G Forouhi; Ruth J F Loos; Sarah Edkins; Tibor V Varga; Göran Hallmans; Heikki Oksa; Mulas Antonella; Ramaiah Nagaraja; Stella Trompet; Ian Ford; Stephan J L Bakker; Augustine Kong; Meena Kumari; Bruna Gigante; Christian Herder; Patricia B Munroe; Mark Caulfield; Jula Antti; Massimo Mangino; Kerrin Small; Iva Miljkovic; Yongmei Liu; Mustafa Atalay; Wieland Kiess; Alan L James; Fernando Rivadeneira; Andre G Uitterlinden; Colin N A Palmer; Alex S F Doney; Gonneke Willemsen; Johannes H Smit; Susan Campbell; Ozren Polasek; Lori L Bonnycastle; Serge Hercberg; Maria Dimitriou; Jennifer L Bolton; Gerard R Fowkes; Peter Kovacs; Jaana Lindström; Tatijana Zemunik; Stefania Bandinelli; Sarah H Wild; Hanneke V Basart; Wolfgang Rathmann; Harald Grallert; Winfried Maerz; Marcus E Kleber; Bernhard O Boehm; Annette Peters; Peter P Pramstaller; Michael A Province; Ingrid B Borecki; Nicholas D Hastie; Igor Rudan; Harry Campbell; Hugh Watkins; Martin Farrall; Michael Stumvoll; Luigi Ferrucci; Dawn M Waterworth; Richard N Bergman; Francis S Collins; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Richard M Watanabe; Eco J C de Geus; Brenda W Penninx; Albert Hofman; Ben A Oostra; Bruce M Psaty; Peter Vollenweider; James F Wilson; Alan F Wright; G Kees Hovingh; Andres Metspalu; Matti Uusitupa; Patrik K E Magnusson; Kirsten O Kyvik; Jaakko Kaprio; Jackie F Price; George V Dedoussis; Panos Deloukas; Pierre Meneton; Lars Lind; Michael Boehnke; Alan R Shuldiner; Cornelia M van Duijn; Andrew D Morris; Anke Toenjes; Patricia A Peyser; John P Beilby; Antje Körner; Johanna Kuusisto; Markku Laakso; Stefan R Bornstein; Peter E H Schwarz; Timo A Lakka; Rainer Rauramaa; Linda S Adair; George Davey Smith; Tim D Spector; Thomas Illig; Ulf de Faire; Anders Hamsten; Vilmundur Gudnason; Mika Kivimaki; Aroon Hingorani; Sirkka M Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi; Timo E Saaristo; Dorret I Boomsma; Kari Stefansson; Pim van der Harst; Josée Dupuis; Nancy L Pedersen; Naveed Sattar; Tamara B Harris; Francesco Cucca; Samuli Ripatti; Veikko Salomaa; Karen L Mohlke; Beverley Balkau; Philippe Froguel; Anneli Pouta; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin; Nicholas J Wareham; Nabila Bouatia-Naji; Mark I McCarthy; Paul W Franks; James B Meigs; Tanya M Teslovich; Jose C Florez; Claudia Langenberg; Erik Ingelsson; Inga Prokopenko; Inês Barroso
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Christian Fuchsberger; Jason Flannick; Tanya M Teslovich; Anubha Mahajan; Vineeta Agarwala; Kyle J Gaulton; Clement Ma; Pierre Fontanillas; Loukas Moutsianas; Davis J McCarthy; Manuel A Rivas; John R B Perry; Xueling Sim; Thomas W Blackwell; Neil R Robertson; N William Rayner; Pablo Cingolani; Adam E Locke; Juan Fernandez Tajes; Heather M Highland; Josee Dupuis; Peter S Chines; Cecilia M Lindgren; Christopher Hartl; Anne U Jackson; Han Chen; Jeroen R Huyghe; Martijn van de Bunt; Richard D Pearson; Ashish Kumar; Martina Müller-Nurasyid; Niels Grarup; Heather M Stringham; Eric R Gamazon; Jaehoon Lee; Yuhui Chen; Robert A Scott; Jennifer E Below; Peng Chen; Jinyan Huang; Min Jin Go; Michael L Stitzel; Dorota Pasko; Stephen C J Parker; Tibor V Varga; Todd Green; Nicola L Beer; Aaron G Day-Williams; Teresa Ferreira; Tasha Fingerlin; Momoko Horikoshi; Cheng Hu; Iksoo Huh; Mohammad Kamran Ikram; Bong-Jo Kim; Yongkang Kim; Young Jin Kim; Min-Seok Kwon; Juyoung Lee; Selyeong Lee; Keng-Han Lin; Taylor J Maxwell; Yoshihiko Nagai; Xu Wang; Ryan P Welch; Joon Yoon; Weihua Zhang; Nir Barzilai; Benjamin F Voight; Bok-Ghee Han; Christopher P Jenkinson; Teemu Kuulasmaa; Johanna Kuusisto; Alisa Manning; Maggie C Y Ng; Nicholette D Palmer; Beverley Balkau; Alena Stančáková; Hanna E Abboud; Heiner Boeing; Vilmantas Giedraitis; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Omri Gottesman; James Scott; Jason Carey; Phoenix Kwan; George Grant; Joshua D Smith; Benjamin M Neale; Shaun Purcell; Adam S Butterworth; Joanna M M Howson; Heung Man Lee; Yingchang Lu; Soo-Heon Kwak; Wei Zhao; John Danesh; Vincent K L Lam; Kyong Soo Park; Danish Saleheen; Wing Yee So; Claudia H T Tam; Uzma Afzal; David Aguilar; Rector Arya; Tin Aung; Edmund Chan; Carmen Navarro; Ching-Yu Cheng; Domenico Palli; Adolfo Correa; Joanne E Curran; Denis Rybin; Vidya S Farook; Sharon P Fowler; Barry I Freedman; Michael Griswold; Daniel Esten Hale; Pamela J Hicks; Chiea-Chuen Khor; Satish Kumar; Benjamin Lehne; Dorothée Thuillier; Wei Yen Lim; Jianjun Liu; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Marie Loh; Solomon K Musani; Sobha Puppala; William R Scott; Loïc Yengo; Sian-Tsung Tan; Herman A Taylor; Farook Thameem; Gregory Wilson; Tien Yin Wong; Pål Rasmus Njølstad; Jonathan C Levy; Massimo Mangino; Lori L Bonnycastle; Thomas Schwarzmayr; João Fadista; Gabriela L Surdulescu; Christian Herder; Christopher J Groves; Thomas Wieland; Jette Bork-Jensen; Ivan Brandslund; Cramer Christensen; Heikki A Koistinen; Alex S F Doney; Leena Kinnunen; Tõnu Esko; Andrew J Farmer; Liisa Hakaste; Dylan Hodgkiss; Jasmina Kravic; Valeriya Lyssenko; Mette Hollensted; Marit E Jørgensen; Torben Jørgensen; Claes Ladenvall; Johanne Marie Justesen; Annemari Käräjämäki; Jennifer Kriebel; Wolfgang Rathmann; Lars Lannfelt; Torsten Lauritzen; Narisu Narisu; Allan Linneberg; Olle Melander; Lili Milani; Matt Neville; Marju Orho-Melander; Lu Qi; Qibin Qi; Michael Roden; Olov Rolandsson; Amy Swift; Anders H Rosengren; Kathleen Stirrups; Andrew R Wood; Evelin Mihailov; Christine Blancher; Mauricio O Carneiro; Jared Maguire; Ryan Poplin; Khalid Shakir; Timothy Fennell; Mark DePristo; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Panos Deloukas; Anette P Gjesing; Goo Jun; Peter Nilsson; Jacquelyn Murphy; Robert Onofrio; Barbara Thorand; Torben Hansen; Christa Meisinger; Frank B Hu; Bo Isomaa; Fredrik Karpe; Liming Liang; Annette Peters; Cornelia Huth; Stephen P O'Rahilly; Colin N A Palmer; Oluf Pedersen; Rainer Rauramaa; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Veikko Salomaa; Richard M Watanabe; Ann-Christine Syvänen; Richard N Bergman; Dwaipayan Bharadwaj; Erwin P Bottinger; Yoon Shin Cho; Giriraj R Chandak; Juliana C N Chan; Kee Seng Chia; Mark J Daly; Shah B Ebrahim; Claudia Langenberg; Paul Elliott; Kathleen A Jablonski; Donna M Lehman; Weiping Jia; Ronald C W Ma; Toni I Pollin; Manjinder Sandhu; Nikhil Tandon; Philippe Froguel; Inês Barroso; Yik Ying Teo; Eleftheria Zeggini; Ruth J F Loos; Kerrin S Small; Janina S Ried; Ralph A DeFronzo; Harald Grallert; Benjamin Glaser; Andres Metspalu; Nicholas J Wareham; Mark Walker; Eric Banks; Christian Gieger; Erik Ingelsson; Hae Kyung Im; Thomas Illig; Paul W Franks; Gemma Buck; Joseph Trakalo; David Buck; Inga Prokopenko; Reedik Mägi; Lars Lind; Yossi Farjoun; Katharine R Owen; Anna L Gloyn; Konstantin Strauch; Tiinamaija Tuomi; Jaspal Singh Kooner; Jong-Young Lee; Taesung Park; Peter Donnelly; Andrew D Morris; Andrew T Hattersley; Donald W Bowden; Francis S Collins; Gil Atzmon; John C Chambers; Timothy D Spector; Markku Laakso; Tim M Strom; Graeme I Bell; John Blangero; Ravindranath Duggirala; E Shyong Tai; Gilean McVean; Craig L Hanis; James G Wilson; Mark Seielstad; Timothy M Frayling; James B Meigs; Nancy J Cox; Rob Sladek; Eric S Lander; Stacey Gabriel; Noël P Burtt; Karen L Mohlke; Thomas Meitinger; Leif Groop; Goncalo Abecasis; Jose C Florez; Laura J Scott; Andrew P Morris; Hyun Min Kang; Michael Boehnke; David Altshuler; Mark I McCarthy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 69.504

10.  TGF-β1 promotes colorectal cancer immune escape by elevating B7-H3 and B7-H4 via the miR-155/miR-143 axis.

Authors:  Xinru Zhou; Yong Mao; Jianjie Zhu; Fanyi Meng; Qi Chen; Lihua Tao; Rui Li; Fengqing Fu; Cuiping Liu; Yuanjia Hu; Weipeng Wang; Hongjian Zhang; Dong Hua; Weichang Chen; Xueguang Zhang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-10-11
View more
  15 in total

1.  Identification of Novel Regulatory Regions Induced by Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Rat Islets.

Authors:  Yu-Chin Lien; Sara E Pinney; Xueqing Maggie Lu; Rebecca A Simmons
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 2.  Regulatory mechanisms and potential medical applications of HNF1A-AS1 in cancers.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Jiang Shi; Junfang Luo; Cong Liu; Lixu Zhu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.940

3.  Knockdown of RREB1 inhibits cell proliferation via enhanced p16 expression in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Qi Gao; Yunhua Wu; Chaoxiang Lu; Wang Kai; Weike Xie; Qi Wang; Lei Wang; Shiqi Liu; Yongkang Pan
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 5.173

4.  Side effect prediction based on drug-induced gene expression profiles and random forest with iterative feature selection.

Authors:  Arzu Cakir; Melisa Tuncer; Hilal Taymaz-Nikerel; Ozlem Ulucan
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.550

5.  The transcription factor Rreb1 regulates epithelial architecture, invasiveness, and vasculogenesis in early mouse embryos.

Authors:  Sophie M Morgani; Jie Su; Jennifer Nichols; Joan Massagué; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Disease-Associated Risk Variants in ANRIL Are Associated with Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Presence in Primary Melanomas in the Population-Based GEM Study.

Authors:  Danielle R Davari; Irene Orlow; Peter A Kanetsky; Li Luo; Sharon N Edmiston; Kathleen Conway; Eloise A Parrish; Honglin Hao; Klaus J Busam; Ajay Sharma; Anne Kricker; Anne E Cust; Hoda Anton-Culver; Stephen B Gruber; Richard P Gallagher; Roberto Zanetti; Stefano Rosso; Lidia Sacchetto; Terence Dwyer; David W Ollila; Colin B Begg; Marianne Berwick; Nancy E Thomas
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.090

7.  Genome-Wide Association Analyses of Fertility Traits in Beef Heifers.

Authors:  Morgan R Stegemiller; Gordon K Murdoch; Troy N Rowan; Kimberly M Davenport; Gabrielle M Becker; John B Hall; Brenda M Murdoch
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Superenhancer-transcription factor regulatory network in malignant tumors.

Authors:  Yuan Liang; Linlin Li; Tian Xin; Binru Li; Dalin Zhang
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-10-18

9.  Pan-cancer analysis of non-coding recurrent mutations and their possible involvement in cancer pathogenesis.

Authors:  Chie Kikutake; Minako Yoshihara; Mikita Suyama
Journal:  NAR Cancer       Date:  2021-03-22

10.  Identifying molecular targets for reverse aging using integrated network analysis of transcriptomic and epigenomic changes during aging.

Authors:  Hwang-Yeol Lee; Yeonsu Jeon; Yeon Kyung Kim; Jae Young Jang; Yun Sung Cho; Jong Bhak; Kwang-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.