Literature DB >> 32210688

In-vitro phytochemical and pharmacological bio-efficacy studies on Azadirachta indica A. Juss and Melia azedarach Linn for anticancer activity.

T R J Jeba Malar1,2, J Antonyswamy1, Ponnuswamy Vijayaraghavan3, Young Ock Kim4, Abdullah A Al-Ghamdi5, Mohamed S Elshikh5, Ashraf A Hatamleh5, Monerah A Al-Dosary5, Sae Won Na6, Hak-Jae Kim7.   

Abstract

In this study, phyto-constituents, anti-bacterial and anticancer activity of Azadirachta indica A. Juss and Melia azedarach Linn was analyzed. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) and Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) fingerprint profile of methanol extract of A. indica and M. azedarach was carried out. The present findings showed the presence of phytochemicals such as, steroids, alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, anthraquinone and aminoacids in A. indica and M. azedarach extracts. HPLC profiling of methanolic extract of A. indica and M. azaderach revealed eleven and ten fractions of compounds were visualized in the form of peak. In TLC methanolic extract of A. indica was separated by eight distinct phenolic and three steroidal bands and M. azaderach showed sixteen distinct phenolic and three different steroidal bands. In antibacterial activity, Among the various extracts 50 µg/ml methanolic extracts of A. indica showed high activity against K. pneumoniae (14 mm) and M. azedarach showed high activity against S. aureus (15 mm). The results suggest that the crude methanolic extracts of A. indica and M. azedarach possess significant phytochemical properties compared to other extracts and hence the phytochemicals of M. azedarach and A. indica can be exploited for plant based anticancer and antimicrobial agents in the near future.
© 2019 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticancer; Azadirachta indica; Medicinal plants; Melia azedarach; Phytochemicals

Year:  2019        PMID: 32210688      PMCID: PMC6997857          DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1319-562X            Impact factor:   4.219


Introduction

Medicinal plants have been used widely for the preparation of indigenous medicines and various medicinal plants are used for the formulations of Western medicines. In recent years, various medicines derived from medicinal plants are used to treat various diseases and this is not same in earlier times (Ghimeray et al., 2009, Sultana et al., 2007). The continuous application of various antibiotics rise resistance among various human pathogens. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Mycobacterium tuberculosis are recently recognized as the most difficult hospital associated infections to treat and control. Medicinal plants are widely used to treat these bacterial infections against, Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and K. pneumonia (Ahmad and Beg, 2001, Aqil and Ahmad, 2007, Nostro et al., 2001). Melia azadirachta Linn and Azadiracta indica A. Juss showed novel activity against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and have been reported by Ebong et al., 2008, Upadhyay et al., 2010. Many polyphenolic compounds were reported from the family, Meliaceae and these compounds have potential antioxidant properties. Phytochemicals from A. indica are various biological properties, especially antibacterial and anticancer activity. This plant family contains various antibacterial properties especially against drug resistant bacterial pathogens (Preethi et al., 2010, Ilango et al., 2009). Many medicinal plants show anticancer properties against various cell lines. The phytochemicals from Azadirachta indica (Neem) have antimicrobial activity against various pathogenic organisms (Raut et al., 2014, Koona and Budida, 2011). Also, the potential anticancer property of Azadirachta indica was reported by Moga et al. (2018). Cancer is the one of the important diseases and cause more death throughout the world (Rao, 2010). This disease cause serious clinical implications and pose potential economic and social impacts (Yan et al., 2009). Recently, tubulin was characterized from medicinal plants and it was found to be active against various types of cancers. This compound has various molecular mechanisms and affect microtubule depolymerisation and tubulin polymerization and hinder cell division and leads to apoptosis (Ronakzahan et al., 2011). Use of unambiguous chemicals to prevent the development or slow down the progression of carcinogenesis, the chemoprevention method, offers a promising strategy for cancer prevention (Desoize, 2004). Epidermal evidences suggest the importance of fibres in the treatment of cancer (Preethi et al., 2010). Plant nutrients and non-nutritive materials showed anticancer activity and has been proved in vivo and in vitro methods (Maity et al., 2009). In drug discovery, medicinal plants are very much used to isolate novel bioactive compounds against cancer. More than 75% anti-infectious drugs and 60% anticancer drugs approved by FDA are derived from medicinal plants. The screened polyphenols from various medicinal plants showed anticancer properties against various cell lines (Gibellini et al., 2010). Also, flavonoids derived from medicinal plants showed anticancer properties (Mavundza et al., 2010). Azadirachta indica A. Juss has potential biological properties and effective against various bacterial, fungal infections, dental disorders, skin diseases, leprosy, syphilis, malaria and also has antiseptic property (Ismail et al., 2010, Demiray et al., 2009). About 135 novel compounds with various chemical structures were determined from different parts of this medicinal plant (Hayat et al., 2010), however, very few compounds have been studied for its pharmacological potential. Flavanoids showed anti- inflammatory and antiulcer activities and reported from medicinal plants (Ghimeray et al., 2009). Azadirachtin is a triterpenoid of the class of limonoids, found in the trees of A. indica (Aladakatti et al., 2010). A. indica has been used as insect repellent, and also used to treat various skin infections such as, ringworm, eczema, alopecia, scabies, ticks, urticaria and lice in animals (Nahak and Sahu, 2010). A. indica also used as antifungal, antibacterial and antiviral agents (Olabinri et al., 2009), antiatherosclerotic activity, antidiabetic activity, antimalarial activity (Omale and Okafor, 2008), antinociceptive activity, antiulcer activity, cardiovascular activity, hepatoprotective activity (Shukla et al., 2009), antitumour activity, growth regulatory activity and insecticidal activity (Galani et al., 2010, Balamurugan, 2015, Kannan and Agastian, 2015, Rathi et al., 2015). Melia azedarach Linn is abundant in almost all countries and it is similar to Neem trees. Alkaloids are the predominantly present in the inner bark and it is widely used as anthelmintic. This plant also shows the properties such as, anticancer, antimalarial, antifungal, antibacterial, antifertility and antifeedent activity (Brandenbrug, 2008, Vishnukanta and Rana, 2008). M. azedarach also has analgesic activity by various molecular mechanisms and has been reported by Abdelouaheb et al. (2009). The leaves of this medicinal plant inhibit phagocytosis and respiratory burst and reported by Torey et al. (2010). The stem extracts of M. azederacta induced larval mortality and insecticidal activity (Upadhyay et al., 2010). In a study, a novel peptide Meliacine, characterized from leaves showed inhibitory effect and effectively inhibit the multiplication of foot and mouth disease virus (Salib et al., 2008)

Materials and methods

Collection of plant material

The aerial parts of Azadirachta indica A. Juss and Melia azedarach Linn were collected and washed with tap water and air dried. The dried plant materials were powdered and stored for analysis.

Extraction of phytochemicals

Dried plants powder (10 g) was extracted with various solvents such as, ether, petroleum, methanol, hexane and water. All extracts were kept at dark for 3 days and shaken intermittently. The extract was filtered using Whatman Number 1 filter paper and the filtrate was evaporated.

Phytochemical analysis

The extracted phytochemicals from the selected medicinal plants, Melia azedarach and Azadirachta indica were screened to determine the presence of steroids, alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, anthraquinone and aminoacids (Wagner and Ulrich-Merzenich, 2009, Russell and Morris, 1982, Costa et al., 2010).

Isolation of bioactive compounds using High Performance of Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

High Performance of Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis was carried out using a Shimadzu LC – 10 AT VP HPLC system. Elution of bioactive compounds is performed using methanol as a mobile phase, which was filtered previously. 20 μl sample was injected manually and detected the active principles using a UV–Vis detector at 254 nm (Mallikharjuna et al., 2007, Sharanabasappa et al., 2007).

Separation of phenols and steroids using Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC)

The methanolic extracts were subjected to separation by using Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC). TLC studies for phenols and steroids were carried out by the method of Preethi et al. (2010).

In vitro anti cancer activity

Anticancer property of plant extracts were tested against MCF cell lines. It was procured from NCCS, Pune, India. It was sub cultured on to microtitre plates and used for further studies. Anti-cancer activity of medicinal plants was determined on MCF cell lines at various concentrations (50, 100, 150, 200 µg/ml). The percentage of viability and inhibition was calculated.

MTT assay

MTT assay was performed as suggested by Amer et al. (2010) with little modifications. The purified fractions were subjected for MTT assay.

Analysis of antibacterial property

Disc diffusion method was used for the screening of antibacterial activity of medicinal plants. The methanolic extract from A. indica and M. azedarach were screened for antibacterial studies against selected bacteria such as, E. coli, K. pneumonia, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus (Koona and Budida, 2011). Commercially available antibiotic disc Amphicillin was implanted along with the crude extract disc on the surface of the Muller-Hinton agar plates which is used as a positive control.

Results

Phytochemical components

In the present study, preliminary phytochemical screening of eight different metabolites (steroids, saponins, phenols, tannin, alkaloids, anthraquinone, amino acids and flavanoids) were tested in four different extracts. Experiments revealed the presence of steroids, saponins, tannin, anthraquinone, amino acids, flavanoids, phenols and alkaloids. A. indica extracts showed alkaloids, saponins, phenolics, Anthroquinones, flavanoids and tannins, whereas aqueous extract showed the presence of alkaloids, steroids, flavanoids, saponins. Methanolic fraction of M. azedarach showed steroids, phenolics, anthroquinones, flavanoids and tannins (Table 1).
Table 1

Preliminary phytochemical screening of different plant extracts of Azadirachta indica and Melia azedarach.

Type of constituentsPetroleum ether
Methanol
Hexane
Aqueous
A. indicaM. azedarachA. indicaM. azedarachA. indicaM. azedarachA. indicaM. azedarach
Steroids+++
Alkaloids++++
Phenols+++++
Flavonoids++++++
Saponins+++++
Tannins+++
Anthraquinones++
Aminoacids++
Preliminary phytochemical screening of different plant extracts of Azadirachta indica and Melia azedarach.

Separation of compounds using HPLC

HPLC analysis was performed for the isolation of compounds from the plant samples of A. indica and M. azedarach (Fig. 1, Fig. 2). Eleven major peaks were analyzed and the second peak was obtained at 2.107 min and it showed higher concentration (34.8%), while the sixth peak at 4.830 min showed lowest intensity (0.2%). Likewise, HPLC profile of methanol extract Melia azedarach was measured at 254 nm. Ten fractions of compounds were observed and the third peak showed high intensity at 2.413 min (40.3%), whereas, 8th peak showed with 11.877 min retention time showed least intensity (0.7%).
Fig. 1

HPLC Fingerprint profiling of Azadiracta indica.

Fig. 2

HPLC Fingerprint profiling of Melia azedaracta.

HPLC Fingerprint profiling of Azadiracta indica. HPLC Fingerprint profiling of Melia azedaracta.

TLC profiling of steroids and phenols

Separation of phenols

A. indica extract was separated by eight distinct phenolic bands with different Rf values 0.118, 0.152, 0.237, 0.254, 0.542, 0.711, 0.813 and 0.898. Melia azedarach separated by sixteen distinct phenolic bands were observed with different Rf values 0.377, 0.754, 0.094, 0.132, 0.169, 0.226, 0.283, 0.358, 0.452, 0.566, 0.660, 0.792, 0.830, 0.849, 0.943 and 0.981. All the bands were golden yellow in colour and visualized only after iodine spray (Table 2).
Table 2

Separation of phenols in Azadirachta indica and Melia azedarach.

Rf ValuesMelia azedarachAzadirachta indica
0.03+
0.07+
0.09+
0.11+
0.13+
0.16++
0.23++
0.25+
0.28+
0.35+
0.45+
0.54+
0.56+
0.66+
0.71+
0.79+
0.81+
0.84+
0.89+
0.94+
0.98+
Total168
Separation of phenols in Azadirachta indica and Melia azedarach.

Separation of steroids

The steroids from A. indica were separated by three different bands with Rf values, 0.05, 0.66 and 0.466. Melia azedarach separated by three different steroidal bands with Rf values 0.036, 0.109 and 0.1818 cm. All the bands were blueish green in colour and visualized only in the presence of iodine vapour (Table 3).
Table 3

Separation of steroids in Azadirachta indica and Melia azedarach.

RFMelia azedarachAzadirachta indica
0.03+_
0.05_+
0.07_+
0.10+_
0.18+_
0.46_+
TOTAL33
Separation of steroids in Azadirachta indica and Melia azedarach.

Anticancer activity

Fig. 3, Fig. 4 illustrated the anticancer property of methanolic extract on aerial parts of A. indica and M. azaderach that inhibited MCF cell lines at different concentration (50, 100, 150, 200 µg/ml). IC50 values of solvent extract of aerial parts of A. indica and M. azaderach were 165.5629 and 280.8989 µg/ml respectively. 200 µg/ml of the methanolic extract of A. indica revealed highest percentage of inhibition of 65.5% and lowest viability activity of 60.4%. In comparison to these methanolic extract of M. azedarach showed highest percentage of inhibition of 47.05% in 200 µg/ml of plant extract and lowest viability activity of 68%. In our study, IC50 value and percentage of inhibition of the methanolic extracts of A. indica showed high cytotoxic activity than M. azedarach (Table 4).
Fig. 3

IC 50 value of Azadiracta indica.

Fig. 4

IC 50 value of Melia azedarach.

Table 4

Anticancer activity of methanolic extract of A. indica and M. azedarach.

Cell line : MCF (Human Breast Cancer)
Si noConcOD at 540 nm
% viability
% of Inhibition
IC 50 VALUE
A. indicaM. azedarachA. indicaM. azedarachA. indicaM. azedarachA. indicaM. azedarach
1Control0.2500.250100100165.5629280.8989
2500.2050.23482.093.621.951226.837607
31000.1890.22675.690.432.2751310.61947
41500.1850.21374.085.235.1351417.37089
62000.1510.17060.468.065.562947.05882
IC 50 value of Melia azedarach. IC 50 value of Azadiracta indica. Anticancer activity of methanolic extract of A. indica and M. azedarach.

Antibacterial activity

In A. indica, 50 µg/ml of methanolic extract proved highly effective against K. pneumoniae (14 mm). However, moderate activity was observed in 50 µg/ml of the methanolic fraction of A. indica against S. aureus (9 mm) and E. coli (6 mm). Antibacterial activity of M. azedarach was screened in methanolic extract at five different concentrations against four different pathogens. Among these methanolic extract at 50 µg/ml concentration from M. azedarach showed high activity against S. aureus (16 mm). P. aeroginosa (12 mm) showed moderate sensitivity to methanolic extract of M. azedarach. E. coli showed lowest sensitivity to methanolic extract (5 mm) and no activity was seen in 10, 20, 30 µg/ml of methanolic extract of M. azedarach (Table 5).
Table 5

Antibacterial assay of methanolic extracts of A. indica and M. azedarach.

S.NoTest OrganismZone of inhibition (mm)
10 µg/ml
20 µg/ml
30 µg/ml
40 µg/ml
50 µg/ml
A. indicaM. azedarachA. indicaM. azedarachA. indicaM. azedarachA. indicaM. azedarachA. indicaM. azedarach
1K. pneumonia5881012121415
2S. aureus22466910141216
3P. aeruginosa75879912
4E. coli24365
Antibacterial assay of methanolic extracts of A. indica and M. azedarach.

Discussion

In the present study, two medicinal plant species A. indica and M. azedarach were used to evaluate for its antibacterial and anticancer properties. These two medicinal plants have the potential to inhibit the growth of various drug resistant bacterial species. In our study, we observed the presence of various phytochemicals and these phytochemical showed antibacterial and anticancer activities (Antonisamy et al., 2015). In a study, Timothy et al. (2011) screened the presence of various phytochemicals, including, flavanoids, sugar, terpenoids and the absence of anthroquinones in ethanolic extract of A. indica. In the present study methanolic extract of A. indica contains various phytochemicals including, phenolics, anthroquinones, flavanoids and tannins. Likewise, Suresh et al. (2008) reported the phytochemicals such as, flavanoids, phenolic compounds, triterpenoids and absence of catechols in the chloroform extract of M. azedarach. In this study, methanolic faction M. azedarach revealed the presence of many phytochemcials viz., steroids, phenolics, anthroquinones, flavanoids and tannins. Hexane extract showed the presence of only two compounds (aminoacids and flavanoids). Rajapandiyan et al. (2011) revealed the antibacterial activity of A. indica in five different extracts (Hexane, chloroform, Ethyl acetate, alcohol and aqueous) in four different concentration (800, 1000, 1200, 1400 µg/ml). Among these, 1400 µg/ml of chloroform extract of A. indica showed high activity against P. vulgaris. In a study, Sen and Batra (2012) reported the antibacterial property of M. azedarach of against various bacterial pathogens. Among these, ethanol extract of M. azedarach was found to be active against P. aeroginosa and E.coli and lowest activity was reported in aqueous extract of M. azedarach against E. coli (8.5 mm) and S. aureus (8.2 mm). In the present study, E. coli showed lowest sensitivity to methanolic extract (5 mm) and no activity was observed in 10, 20, 30 µg/ml of methanolic extract of M. azedarach. In a study, Priscila et al. (2009) observed the HPLC profiling of extracts of A. indica and observed two major elution peaks, at retention time, 7.933 min and 8.780 min. In our study, a sharp peak was detected from the ethanolic fractions at 2.107 and 4.830 Chiffelle et al. (2009) observed the HPLC profiling of M. azedarach and observed the presence of fourteen different compounds in different retention time of 2.75 to 49.23 min. In our study, the methanolic fraction of the compounds was eluted between 2.413 min and 11.877 min. Ghosh et al. (2009) reported the TLC profiling of A. indica and noted the presence of a band at the Rf value of 0.527. In our study, methanolic extract of A. indica showed eight distinct phenolic bands and three different steroidal bands with varied range of Rf values of 0.118–0.898 and 0.05–0.466 cm. In the present study invitro anticancer activity was evaluated in crude methanolic extract on aerial parts of A. indica and it inhibited MCF cell lines and had anticancer activity at different concentration. Amer et al. (2010) assessed anticancer activity of A. indica at different concentrations of extract. Nikoletta et al. (2010) stated the invitro cytotoxic property of methanolic fraction of M. azederach in cell line A549.

Conclusion

The potential anti-bacterial and anticancer activity of Azadirachta indica A. Juss and Melia azedarach Linn was analyzed. The present findings showed the presence of phytochemicals such as, steroids, alkaloids, phenols, flavonoids, saponins, tannins, anthraquinone and aminoacids in A. indica and M. azedarach extracts. Methanolic extracts of A. indica showed high activity against K. pneumonia, whereas, M. azedarach was found to be active against S. aureus. The medicinal plants, Azadirachta indica A. Juss and Melia azedarach Linn can be effectively utilized as natural medicine to treat various bacterial infections. Also, these two medicinal plants can be effectively used as anticancer agents.
  12 in total

1.  Antimicrobial and phytochemical studies on 45 Indian medicinal plants against multi-drug resistant human pathogens.

Authors:  I Ahmad; A Z Beg
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.360

Review 2.  Synergy research: approaching a new generation of phytopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  H Wagner; G Ulrich-Merzenich
Journal:  Phytomedicine       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.340

Review 3.  Metals and metal compounds in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Bernard Desoize
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Antibacterial properties of traditionally used Indian medicinal plants.

Authors:  F Aqil; I Ahmad
Journal:  Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03

5.  In vitro antioxidant activity and total phenolic content of ethanolic leaf extract of Stevia rebaudiana Bert.

Authors:  Shruti Shukla; Archana Mehta; Vivek K Bajpai; Savita Shukla
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 6.023

6.  In vitro and in vivo anticancer activity of steroid saponins of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis.

Authors:  L L Yan; Y J Zhang; W Y Gao; S L Man; Y Wang
Journal:  Exp Oncol       Date:  2009-03

7.  Cytotoxic tirucallane triterpenoids from Melia azedarach fruits.

Authors:  Nikoletta G Ntalli; Filippo Cottiglia; Carlos A Bueno; Laura E Alché; Marco Leonti; Simona Vargiu; Ersilia Bifulco; Urania Menkissoglu-Spiroudi; Pierluigi Caboni
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 4.411

8.  Standardization of Cassia spectabilis with respect to authenticity, assay and chemical constituent analysis.

Authors:  Angeline Torey; Sreenivasan Sasidharan; Chen Yeng; Lachimanan Yoga Latha
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 9.  An Overview on the Anticancer Activity of Azadirachta indica (Neem) in Gynecological Cancers.

Authors:  Marius Alexandru Moga; Andreea Bălan; Costin Vlad Anastasiu; Oana Gabriela Dimienescu; Carmen Daniela Neculoiu; Claudia Gavriș
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Interfering with ROS Metabolism in Cancer Cells: The Potential Role of Quercetin.

Authors:  Lara Gibellini; Marcello Pinti; Milena Nasi; Sara De Biasi; Erika Roat; Linda Bertoncelli; Andrea Cossarizza
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  6 in total

1.  In Vitro Antibacterial, Antifungal, Nematocidal and Growth Promoting Activities of Trichoderma hamatum FB10 and Its Secondary Metabolites.

Authors:  Alaa Baazeem; Abdulaziz Almanea; Palanisamy Manikandan; Mohammed Alorabi; Ponnuswamy Vijayaraghavan; Ahmed Abdel-Hadi
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-24

2.  Chemical Components of Aqueous Extracts of Melia azedarach Fruits and Their Effects on The Transcriptome of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Hong Peng; Ying-Si Wang; Jie Wang; Su-Juan Li; Ting-Li Sun; Tong Liu; Qing-Shan Shi; Gang Zhou; Xiao-Bao Xie
Journal:  Pol J Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-23

3.  Evaluation of The Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Anticancer Activities of Dicliptera bupleuroides Isolated Compounds Using In Vitro and In Silico Studies.

Authors:  Shehla Akbar; Saiqa Ishtiaq; Muhammad Jahangir; Sameh S Elhady; Hanin A Bogari; Abdelrahman M Alahdal; Mohamed L Ashour; Fadia S Youssef
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.411

4.  Antihypertensive Activity in High Salt-Induced Hypertensive Rats and LC-MS/MS-Based Phytochemical Profiling of Melia azedarach L. (Meliaceae) Leaves.

Authors:  Anam Saeed; Kashif Bashir; Abdul Jabbar Shah; Rahila Qayyum; Taous Khan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 5.  A Review of Medicinal Plants of the Himalayas with Anti-Proliferative Activity for the Treatment of Various Cancers.

Authors:  Hailemeleak Regassa; Anuradha Sourirajan; Vikas Kumar; Sadanand Pandey; Deepak Kumar; Kamal Dev
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  1-Cinnamoyltrichilinin from Melia azedarach Causes Apoptosis through the p38 MAPK Pathway in HL-60 Human Leukemia Cells.

Authors:  Hoibin Jeong; SeonJu Park; Seo-Young Kim; Su-Hyeon Cho; Myeong Seon Jeong; Song-Rae Kim; Jong Bok Seo; Seung Hyun Kim; Kil-Nam Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.