Literature DB >> 32210601

Deep Learning-Based Method of Diagnosing Hyperlipidemia and Providing Diagnostic Markers Automatically.

Yuliang Liu1, Quan Zhang1, Geng Zhao2, Guohua Liu3,4, Zhiang Liu5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The research of auxiliary diagnosis has always been one of the hotspots in the world. The implementation of auxiliary diagnosis support algorithm for medical text data faces challenges with interpretability and creditability. The improvement of clinical diagnostic techniques means not only the improvement of diagnostic accuracy but also the further study of diagnostic basis. Traditional research methods for diagnostic markers often require a large amount of time and economic costs. Research objects are often dozens of samples, and it is, therefore, difficult to synthesize large amounts of data. Therefore, the comprehensiveness and reliability of traditional methods have yet to be improved. Therefore, the establishment of a model that can automatically diagnose diseases and automatically provide a diagnostic basis at the same time has a positive effect on the improvement of medical diagnostic techniques.
METHODS: Here, we established an auxiliary diagnostic tool based on attention deep learning algorithm to diagnostic hyperlipemia and automatically predict the corresponding diagnostic markers using hematological parameters. In this paper, we not only demonstrated the ability of the proposed model to automatically diagnose diseases using text-based medical data, such as physiological parameters, but also demonstrated its ability to forecast disease diagnostic markers. Human physiological parameters are used as input to the model, and the doctor's diagnosis results as an output. Through the attention layer, the degree of attention of the model to different physiological parameters can be obtained, that is, the model provides a diagnostic basis.
RESULTS: It achieved 94% ACC, 97.48% AUC, 96% sensitivity and 92% specificity with the test dataset. All the above samples are drawn from clinical practice. Moreover, the model predicted the diagnostic markers of hyperlipidemia by the attention mechanism, and the results were fully agreeable to the golden criteria. DISCUSSION: The auxiliary diagnosis system proposed in this paper not only achieves the accurate and robust performance, and can be used for the preliminary diagnosis of patients, but also showing its great potential to discover new diagnostic markers. Therefore, it not only can improve the efficiency of clinical diagnosis but also shorten the research period of researching a diagnosis basis to an extent. It has a positive significance to the development of the medical diagnosis level.
© 2020 Liu et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial intelligence; attention mechanism; automatic diagnosis; automatic predictive diagnostic markers; hyperlipemia

Year:  2020        PMID: 32210601      PMCID: PMC7073442          DOI: 10.2147/DMSO.S242585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes        ISSN: 1178-7007            Impact factor:   3.168


  36 in total

1.  Medicine: The final frontier in cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Sancy A Leachman; Glenn Merlino
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  HDL and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Daniel J Rader; G Kees Hovingh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Effects of Chinese herbal medicine on hyperlipidemia and the risk of cardiovascular disease in HIV-infected patients in Taiwan.

Authors:  Fuu-Jen Tsai; Te-Mao Li; Chi-Fung Cheng; Yang-Chang Wu; Chih-Ho Lai; Tsung-Jung Ho; Xiang Liu; Hsinyi Tsang; Ting-Hsu Lin; Chiu-Chu Liao; Shao-Mei Huang; Ju-Pi Li; Jung-Chun Lin; Chih-Chien Lin; Wen-Miin Liang; Ying-Ju Lin
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2018-03-10       Impact factor: 4.360

4.  Diagnostic inflammatory markers in acute cholangitis.

Authors:  Andrei M Beliaev; Michael Booth; David Rowbotham; Colleen Bergin
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Informativeness of Diagnostic Marker Values and the Impact of Data Grouping.

Authors:  Hua Ma; Andriy I Bandos; David Gur
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  Meeting brain-computer interface user performance expectations using a deep neural network decoding framework.

Authors:  Michael A Schwemmer; Nicholas D Skomrock; Per B Sederberg; Jordyn E Ting; Gaurav Sharma; Marcia A Bockbrader; David A Friedenberg
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 7.  Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.

Authors:  Nicole Gray Weiskopf; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Machine learning and medical education.

Authors:  Vijaya B Kolachalama; Priya S Garg
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2018-09-27

9.  Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning.

Authors:  Nicolas Coudray; Paolo Santiago Ocampo; Theodore Sakellaropoulos; Navneet Narula; Matija Snuderl; David Fenyö; Andre L Moreira; Narges Razavian; Aristotelis Tsirigos
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Clinical significance of analysis of the level of blood fat, CRP and hemorheological indicators in the diagnosis of elder coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Qing Yang; Jing-Hua Wang; Dan-Dan Huang; Da-Guang Li; Bo Chen; Ling-Min Zhang; Cui-Ling Yuan; Li-Jing Cai
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 4.219

View more
  1 in total

1.  The relationship between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and glycosylated hemoglobin in diabetic patients aged 20 or above: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rui Huang; Li Yan; Yuhua Lei
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 2.763

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.