| Literature DB >> 32210045 |
Gheorghe Paltanea1, Veronica Manescu Paltanea1, Radu Stefanoiu2, Iosif Vasile Nemoianu1, Horia Gavrila1.
Abstract
Due to worldwide regulations on electriEntities:
Keywords: chemical composition; cutting technology; energy loss separation; grain size; magnetic permeability; non-oriented electrical steels; soft magnetic materials
Year: 2020 PMID: 32210045 PMCID: PMC7142443 DOI: 10.3390/ma13061455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Physical and geometrical properties of the investigated non-oriented electrical steels [28].
| Sample Grade | Mass Density [g/cm3] | Electrical Resistivity [Ωm] | Thickness [mm] |
|---|---|---|---|
| M800-65A | 7.80 | 25 × 10−8 | 0.65 |
| M800-50A | 7.80 | 23 × 10−8 | 0.50 |
| M400-65A | 7.65 | 44 × 10−8 | 0.65 |
| M400-50A | 7.70 | 42 × 10−8 | 0.50 |
| M300-35A | 7.65 | 50 × 10−8 | 0.35 |
| NO20 | 7.65 | 52 × 10−8 | 0.20 |
Figure 1Digital wattmeter set-up (a) block-diagram [14], (b) first yoke for 30 × 300 mm2 samples, (c) second yoke for 60 × 300 mm2 samples.
Figure 2Strip assembly of the tested samples in the case of 60 mm × 300 mm total area.
Chemical composition of non-oriented electrical steels.
| Sample Grade | Chemical Element | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe [%] | Si [%] | Mn [%] | Al [%] | P [%] | S [%] | C [%] | |
| M800-65A | 96.4 | 1.43 | 0.58 | 0.215 | 0.049 | 0.005 | 0.033 |
| M800-50A | 98.3 | 1.177 | 0.213 | 0.129 | 0.043 | 0.005 | 0.0095 |
| M400-65A | 96.8 | 2.19 | 0.146 | 0.401 | 0.021 | 0.003 | 0.0095 |
| M400-50A | 97.1 | 1.99 | 0.183 | 0.376 | 0.021 | 0.003 | 0.0094 |
| M300-35A | 96.7 | 1.95 | 0.251 | 0.458 | 0.029 | 0.004 | 0.0094 |
| NO20 | 96.5 | 2.31 | 0.185 | 0.341 | 0.033 | 0.004 | 0.0120 |
Figure 3Normal magnetization curves measured at f = 2 Hz, in the case of (a) M800-65A and (b) M400-65A electrical steels.
Figure 4Normal magnetization curves of two electrical steel types (a) M800 and (b) M400, in the case of different sample thickness (0.50 mm and 0.65 mm).
Figure 5Total energy loss versus frequency measured at Jp = 0.5 T (a) and Jp = 1.0 T (b), in the case of M800-65A and M400-65A electrical steels.
Figure 6Total energy loss versus frequency measured at Jp = 1.0 T of two electrical steel types (a) M800 and (b) M400, in the case of different sample thickness (0.50 mm and 0.65 mm).
Figure 7Relative magnetic permeability versus frequency measured at two values of Jp = 0.5 T (a) and 1.0 T (b), in the case of M800-65A and M400-65A electrical steels.
Figure 8Real (a) and imaginary (b) components of relative magnetic permeability versus frequency measured at Jp = 1.0 T, in the case of M800-65A and M400-65A electrical steels.
Figure 9Normal magnetization curves of M400 electrical steel grade, in the case of different sample thickness (0.50 mm (a) and 0.65 mm (b)) and two cutting technologies.
Figure 10Normal magnetization curves of electrical steel grade NO20 (a) and M300-35A (b), in the case of two cutting technologies.
Figure 11Total energy loss versus frequency dependencies of electrical steel grade M400-65A (a) and M400-50A (b), in the case of two cutting technologies.
Figure 12Total energy loss versus frequency dependencies of electrical steel grade NO20 (a) and M300-35A (b), in the case of two cutting technologies.
Total energy loss Wtot [mJ/kg] at frequency f = 50 Hz and magnetic polarization Jp = 1 T for two different widths w = 5, 30 mm.
| Sample Grade | Punching |
| Water |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| [%] |
|
| [%] | |
| M400-65A | 53.041 | 39.541 | 25.452 | 36.636 | 31.297 | 14.573 |
| M400-50A | 42.909 | 32.658 | 23.890 | 25.671 | 22.429 | 12.629 |
| M300-35A | 29.292 | 19.869 | 32.169 | 21.865 | 18.771 | 14.150 |
| NO20 | 20.992 | 15.566 | 25.847 | 15.951 | 15.024 | 5.811 |
Where E was computed as: (Wtot-5mm − Wtot-30mm)/Wtot-5mm * 100.
Figure 13Classical (a) and hysteresis energy loss (b), in the case of two cutting technologies.
Average grain size for the investigated non-oriented alloys.
| Sample Grade | < |
|---|---|
| M400-65A | 127 |
| M400-50A | 92 |
| M300-35A | 86 |
| NO20 | 122 |
Figure 14Excess energy loss versus frequency dependencies of electrical steel grade M400-65A (a) and M400-50A (b), in the case of two cutting technologies.
Figure 15Excess energy loss versus frequency dependencies of electrical steel grade M300-35A (a) and NO20 (b), in the case of two cutting technologies.
Figure 16Relative magnetic permeability versus frequency dependencies of electrical steel grade M400-65A (a) and M400-50A (b), in the case of two cutting technologies.
Figure 17Relative magnetic permeability versus frequency dependencies of electrical steel grade M300-35A (a) and NO20 (b), in the case of two cutting technologies.