Literature DB >> 32209653

Transcriptional and translational S-box riboswitches differ in ligand-binding properties.

Divyaa Bhagdikar1, Frank J Grundy1, Tina M Henkin2.   

Abstract

There are a number of riboswitches that utilize the same ligand-binding domain to regulate transcription or translation. S-box (SAM-I) riboswitches, including the riboswitch present in the Bacillus subtilis metI gene, which encodes cystathionine γ-synthase, regulate the expression of genes involved in methionine metabolism in response to SAM, primarily at the level of transcriptional attenuation. A rarer class of S-box riboswitches is predicted to regulate translation initiation. Here we identified and characterized a translational S-box riboswitch in the metI gene from Desulfurispirillum indicum The regulatory mechanisms of riboswitches are influenced by the kinetics of ligand interaction. The half-life of the translational D. indicum metI RNA-SAM complex is significantly shorter than that of the transcriptional B. subtilis metI RNA. This finding suggests that, unlike the transcriptional RNA, the translational metI riboswitch can make multiple reversible regulatory decisions. Comparison of both RNAs revealed that the second internal loop of helix P3 in the transcriptional RNA usually contains an A residue, whereas the translational RNA contains a C residue that is conserved in other S-box RNAs that are predicted to regulate translation. Mutational analysis indicated that the presence of an A or C residue correlates with RNA-SAM complex stability. Biochemical analyses indicate that the internal loop sequence critically determines the stability of the RNA-SAM complex by influencing the flexibility of residues involved in SAM binding and thereby affects the molecular mechanism of riboswitch function.
© 2020 Bhagdikar et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RNA structure; S-adenosylmethionine (SAM); SAM riboswitch; aptamer; gene regulation; ligand binding; riboswitch; transcription regulation; transcriptional S-box riboswitch; translation regulation; translational S-box riboswitch

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32209653      PMCID: PMC7242704          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.012853

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  56 in total

1.  Physiological response of Desulfurispirillum indicum S5 to arsenate and nitrate as terminal electron acceptors.

Authors:  Ines Rauschenbach; Elisabetta Bini; Max M Häggblom; Nathan Yee
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.194

2.  Tuning riboswitch regulation through conformational selection.

Authors:  Ross C Wilson; Angela M Smith; Ryan T Fuchs; Ian R Kleckner; Tina M Henkin; Mark P Foster
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Riboswitch-Mediated Gene Regulation: Novel RNA Architectures Dictate Gene Expression Responses.

Authors:  Anna V Sherwood; Tina M Henkin
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 15.500

4.  RNA chain growth rates in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  H Manor; D Goodman; G S Stent
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1969-01-14       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  A tertiary structural element in S box leader RNAs is required for S-adenosylmethionine-directed transcription termination.

Authors:  Brooke A McDaniel; Frank J Grundy; Tina M Henkin
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.501

6.  RNA tertiary structure mediation by adenosine platforms.

Authors:  J H Cate; A R Gooding; E Podell; K Zhou; B L Golden; A A Szewczak; C E Kundrot; T R Cech; J A Doudna
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  A decade of riboswitches.

Authors:  Alexander Serganov; Evgeny Nudler
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Comparative study between transcriptionally- and translationally-acting adenine riboswitches reveals key differences in riboswitch regulatory mechanisms.

Authors:  Jean-François Lemay; Guillaume Desnoyers; Simon Blouin; Benoit Heppell; Laurène Bastet; Patrick St-Pierre; Eric Massé; Daniel A Lafontaine
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Riboswitch diversity and distribution.

Authors:  Phillip J McCown; Keith A Corbino; Shira Stav; Madeline E Sherlock; Ronald R Breaker
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 4.942

10.  Differences between cotranscriptional and free riboswitch folding.

Authors:  Benjamin Lutz; Michael Faber; Abhinav Verma; Stefan Klumpp; Alexander Schug
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.