Literature DB >> 32209610

Demographic variation in fit note receipt and long-term conditions in south London.

Sarah Dorrington1,2, Ewan Carr3, Sharon A M Stevelink4,5, Alexandru Dregan4, David Whitney6, Stevo Durbaba6, Mark Ashworth6, Arnstein Mykletun7,8,9,10,11, Matthew Broadbent2, Ira Madan12, Stephani Hatch4, Matthew Hotopf4,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Introduced in the UK in 2010, the fit note was designed to address the problem of long-term sickness absence. We explored (1) associations between demographic variables and fit note receipt, 'maybe fit' use and long-term conditions, (2) whether individuals with long-term conditions receive more fit notes and are more likely to have the 'maybe fit' option selected and (3) whether long-term conditions explained associations between demographic variables and fit note receipt.
METHODS: Data were extracted from Lambeth DataNet, a database containing electronic medical records of all 45 general practitioner (GP) practices within the borough of Lambeth. Individual-level anonymised data on GP consultations, prescriptions, Quality and Outcomes Framework diagnostic data and demographic information were analysed using survival analysis.
RESULTS: In a sample of 326 415 people, 41 502 (12.7%) received a fit note. We found substantial differences in fit note receipt by gender, age, ethnicity and area-level deprivation. Chronic pain (HR 3.7 (95% CI 3.3 to 4.0)) and depression (HR 3.4 (95% CI 3.3 to 3.6)) had the highest rates for first fit note receipt. 'Maybe fit' recommendations were used least often in patients with epilepsy and serious mental illness. The presence of long-term conditions did not explain associations between demographic variables and fit note use.
CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we show the relationships between fit note use and long-term conditions using individual-level primary care data from south London. Further research is required in order to evaluate this relatively new policy and to understand the needs of the population it was designed to support. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  epidemiology; fit note; occupational health practice; primary care

Year:  2020        PMID: 32209610     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  4 in total

Review 1.  Primary Care Physicians' Learning Needs in Returning Ill or Injured Workers to Work. A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Andrea D Furlan; Shireen Harbin; Fabricio F Vieira; Emma Irvin; Colette N Severin; Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia; Margaret Tiong; Anil Adisesh
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-05

2.  Prevalence and predictors of potentially inappropriate prescribing in middle-aged adults: a repeated cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Amandeep Khatter; Frank Moriarty; Mark Ashworth; Stevo Durbaba; Patrick Redmond
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.302

3.  Health condition at first fit note and number of fit notes: a longitudinal study of primary care records in south London.

Authors:  Sarah Dorrington; Ewan Carr; C Polling; Sharon Stevelink; Mark Ashworth; Emmert Roberts; Matthew Broadbent; Stephani Hatch; Ira Madan; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Access to mental healthcare in the year after first fit note: a longitudinal study of linked clinical records.

Authors:  Sarah Dorrington; Ewan Carr; Sharon Stevelink; Mark Ashworth; Matthew Broadbent; Ira Madan; Stephani Hatch; Matthew Hotopf
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.