Literature DB >> 32209523

The Sensitivity of the cVEMP Test in Detecting A Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and the Influence of a Coexisting Incudal Lysis: A Case Report.

Morgana Sluydts1, Anja Bernaerts2, Bert De Foer2, Andrzej Zarowski1, Joost van Dinther1, Robby Vanspauwen1, Erwin Offeciers1.   

Abstract

In this case report, the air-conducted cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (AC cVEMP) test was only sensitive for the left superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD), even though the contralateral SCD was of equal length (2.5 mm). Furthermore, a lysis of the processus lenticularis incudis caused a real conductive hearing loss in the left ear. A diminished left AC cVEMP was thus expected, but the opposite was shown (increased corrected amplitude, lowered detection threshold). The patient only experienced hearing loss, so middle ear surgery was performed to repair the lysis. The postoperative AC cVEMP showed a further "uncovering" of the SCD with increased corrected amplitude on the left but no vestibular symptoms. The significance of an SCD should be interpreted with caution, even when the AC cVEMP and the imaging are significant. Furthermore, AC cVEMPs should not be considered as evidence for the absence or presence of conductive hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32209523      PMCID: PMC7224441          DOI: 10.5152/iao.2019.6790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Adv Otol        ISSN: 1308-7649            Impact factor:   1.017


  8 in total

Review 1.  Vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in patients with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  K Brantberg; J Bergenius; A Tribukait
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior canal as a cause of apparent conductive hearing loss.

Authors:  Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey; Phillip D Cremer; Lawrence R Lustig; Sven-Olrik Streubel; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  A superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome multicenter study: is there an association between size and symptoms?

Authors:  Alain Pfammatter; Vincent Darrouzet; Marcel Gärtner; Thomas Somers; Joost Van Dinther; Franco Trabalzini; Denis Ayache; Thomas Linder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Diagnosis of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence in the Presence of Concomitant Otosclerosis.

Authors:  Michael Yong; Erica Zaia; Brian Westerberg; Jane Lea
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Audiometric and cVEMP Thresholds Show Little Correlation With Symptoms in Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome.

Authors:  Kimberley S Noij; Kevin Wong; Maria J Duarte; Salwa Masud; Nicholas A Dewyer; Barbara S Herrmann; John J Guinan; Elliott D Kozin; David H Jung; Steven D Rauch; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Symptoms Unmasked by Ossicular Chain Reconstruction.

Authors:  Omid Moshtaghi; Hossein Mahboubi; Hamid R Djalilian; Harrison W Lin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  L B Minor; D Solomon; J S Zinreich; D S Zee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-03

8.  Surgical treatment of hearing loss when otosclerosis coexists with superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  Cedric V Pritchett; Matthew E Spector; Paul R Kileny; Katherine D Heidenreich; Hussam K El-Kashlan
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.311

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.