Joshua T B Williams1,2, Michael P Fisher3, Elizabeth A Bayliss4,5, Megan A Morris5,6, Sean T O'Leary2,7. 1. Department of Pediatrics (Ambulatory Care Services), Denver Health Medical Center , Denver, CO, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, CO, USA. 3. Division of Business, Healthcare Administration Program, Ohio Dominican University , Columbus, OH, USA. 4. Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado , Aurora, CO, USA. 5. Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine , Aurora, CO, USA. 6. Qualitative Research Core, Adult and Child Consortium for Health Outcomes Research and Delivery Science (ACCORDS) , Aurora, CO, USA. 7. Section of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus , Aurora, CO, USA.
Abstract
Background: Recent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases have affected members of religious communities. While major religions support vaccines, the views of individual clergy who practice and propagate major faith traditions are unclear. Our objective was to explore clergy attitudes toward vaccines and vaccine advocacy. Methods: In 2018-2019, we conducted qualitative interviews with clergy in Colorado and North Carolina. We inductively analyzed transcripts using a grounded theory approach, developing codes iteratively, resolving disagreements by consensus, and identifying themes. Results: We interviewed 16 clergy (1 Buddhist, 3 Catholic, 2 Jewish, 1 Hindu, 1 Islamic, 7 Protestant, and 1 Unity). Analyses yielded seven themes: attitudes toward vaccines, congregational needs, public health climate, perceived responsibility, comfort and competing interests, reported advocacy efforts, and clergy health advocacy goals. Most clergy had positive vaccination attitudes and were open to vaccine advocacy, although discomfort with medical concepts and competing interests in their congregations influenced whether many had chosen to advocate for vaccines. Over half reported promoting vaccination in various contexts. Conclusions: In our sample, U.S. clergy held complex attitudes toward vaccines, informed by experience and social norms as much as religious beliefs or Scriptures. Clergy may be open to vaccine advocacy, but a perceived lack of relevance in their faith communities or a lack of medical expertise may limit their advocacy efforts in diverse contexts. Amidst growing vaccine hesitancy, pediatricians could partner with clergy in their communities, answer questions about vaccines, raise awareness of recent outbreaks, and empower clergy in joint educational events.
Background: Recent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases have affected members of religious communities. While major religions support vaccines, the views of individual clergy who practice and propagate major faith traditions are unclear. Our objective was to explore clergy attitudes toward vaccines and vaccine advocacy. Methods: In 2018-2019, we conducted qualitative interviews with clergy in Colorado and North Carolina. We inductively analyzed transcripts using a grounded theory approach, developing codes iteratively, resolving disagreements by consensus, and identifying themes. Results: We interviewed 16 clergy (1 Buddhist, 3 Catholic, 2 Jewish, 1 Hindu, 1 Islamic, 7 Protestant, and 1 Unity). Analyses yielded seven themes: attitudes toward vaccines, congregational needs, public health climate, perceived responsibility, comfort and competing interests, reported advocacy efforts, and clergy health advocacy goals. Most clergy had positive vaccination attitudes and were open to vaccine advocacy, although discomfort with medical concepts and competing interests in their congregations influenced whether many had chosen to advocate for vaccines. Over half reported promoting vaccination in various contexts. Conclusions: In our sample, U.S. clergy held complex attitudes toward vaccines, informed by experience and social norms as much as religious beliefs or Scriptures. Clergy may be open to vaccine advocacy, but a perceived lack of relevance in their faith communities or a lack of medical expertise may limit their advocacy efforts in diverse contexts. Amidst growing vaccine hesitancy, pediatricians could partner with clergy in their communities, answer questions about vaccines, raise awareness of recent outbreaks, and empower clergy in joint educational events.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Omolade Oladejo; Kristen Allen; Avnika Amin; Paula M Frew; Robert A Bednarczyk; Saad B Omer Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Manisha Patel; Adria D Lee; Nakia S Clemmons; Susan B Redd; Sarah Poser; Debra Blog; Jane R Zucker; Jessica Leung; Ruth Link-Gelles; Huong Pham; Robert J Arciuolo; Elizabeth Rausch-Phung; Bettina Bankamp; Paul A Rota; Cindy M Weinbaum; Paul A Gastañaduy Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Ayokunle A Olagoke; Brenikki Floyd; Rachel Caskey; Jennifer Hebert-Beirne; Andrew D Boyd; Yamile Molina Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2022-02-03