Literature DB >> 32208802

Comparison of Tmax values between full- and half-dose gadolinium perfusion studies.

Søren Christensen1, Shalini Amukotuwa2,3, Maarten G Lansberg1, Stephanie Kemp1, Jeremy J Heit4, Michael Mlynash1, Michael P Marks4, Greg W Albers3, Roland Bammer5.   

Abstract

AHA guidelines recommend use of perfusion imaging for patient selection in the 6-24 h window. Recently, the safety of gadolinium-based contrast agents for MR perfusion imaging has been questioned based on findings that gadolinium accumulates in brain tissue. Regulatory bodies have recommended to limit the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents where possible. Focusing specifically on the time to maximum of the tissue residue function (Tmax) parameter, used in DAWN and DEFUSE 3, we hypothesized that half-dose scans would yield a similar Tmax delay pattern to full-dose scans. We prospectively recruited 10 acute ischemic stroke patients imaged with two perfusion scans at their follow-up visit, one with a standard dose gadolinium followed by a half-dose injection a median of 7 min apart. The brain was parcellated into a grid of 3 × 3 regions and the mean of the difference in Tmax between the 3 × 3 regions on the half- and full-dose Tmax maps was 0.1 s (iqr 0.38 s). The fraction of brain tissue that differed by no more than ±1 s was 93.7%. In patients with normal or modest Tmax delays, half-dose gadolinium appears to provide comparable Tmax measurements to those of full-dose scans.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gadolinium; contrast agent; penumbra; perfusion MRI; stroke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32208802      PMCID: PMC8370009          DOI: 10.1177/0271678X20914537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab        ISSN: 0271-678X            Impact factor:   6.960


  10 in total

1.  The physiological significance of the time-to-maximum (Tmax) parameter in perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Fernando Calamante; Søren Christensen; Patricia M Desmond; Leif Ostergaard; Stephen M Davis; Alan Connelly
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  International survey of acute stroke imaging used to make revascularization treatment decisions.

Authors:  Max Wintermark; Marie Luby; Natan M Bornstein; Andrew Demchuk; Jens Fiehler; Kohsuke Kudo; Kennedy R Lees; David S Liebeskind; Patrik Michel; Raul G Nogueira; Mark W Parsons; Makoto Sasaki; Joanna M Wardlaw; Ona Wu; Weiwei Zhang; Guangming Zhu; Steven J Warach
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.266

3.  elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration.

Authors:  Stefan Klein; Marius Staring; Keelin Murphy; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Combined low-dose contrast-enhanced MR angiography and perfusion for acute ischemic stroke at 3T: A more efficient stroke protocol.

Authors:  K Nael; A Meshksar; B Ellingson; M Pirastehfar; N Salamon; P Finn; D S Liebeskind; J P Villablanca
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Thrombectomy for Stroke at 6 to 16 Hours with Selection by Perfusion Imaging.

Authors:  Gregory W Albers; Michael P Marks; Stephanie Kemp; Soren Christensen; Jenny P Tsai; Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez; Ryan A McTaggart; Michel T Torbey; May Kim-Tenser; Thabele Leslie-Mazwi; Amrou Sarraj; Scott E Kasner; Sameer A Ansari; Sharon D Yeatts; Scott Hamilton; Michael Mlynash; Jeremy J Heit; Greg Zaharchuk; Sun Kim; Janice Carrozzella; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Roland Bammer; Philip W Lavori; Joseph P Broderick; Maarten G Lansberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct.

Authors:  Raul G Nogueira; Ashutosh P Jadhav; Diogo C Haussen; Alain Bonafe; Ronald F Budzik; Parita Bhuva; Dileep R Yavagal; Marc Ribo; Christophe Cognard; Ricardo A Hanel; Cathy A Sila; Ameer E Hassan; Monica Millan; Elad I Levy; Peter Mitchell; Michael Chen; Joey D English; Qaisar A Shah; Frank L Silver; Vitor M Pereira; Brijesh P Mehta; Blaise W Baxter; Michael G Abraham; Pedro Cardona; Erol Veznedaroglu; Frank R Hellinger; Lei Feng; Jawad F Kirmani; Demetrius K Lopes; Brian T Jankowitz; Michael R Frankel; Vincent Costalat; Nirav A Vora; Albert J Yoo; Amer M Malik; Anthony J Furlan; Marta Rubiera; Amin Aghaebrahim; Jean-Marc Olivot; Wondwossen G Tekle; Ryan Shields; Todd Graves; Roger J Lewis; Wade S Smith; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; Tudor G Jovin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Contrast agent dose effects in cerebral dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Jeffry R Alger; Timothy J Schaewe; Tom C Lai; Andrew J Frew; Paul M Vespa; Maria Etchepare; David S Liebeskind; Jeffrey L Saver; S Chelsea Kidwell
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  High signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images: relationship with increasing cumulative dose of a gadolinium-based contrast material.

Authors:  Tomonori Kanda; Kazunari Ishii; Hiroki Kawaguchi; Kazuhiro Kitajima; Daisuke Takenaka
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Six-minute magnetic resonance imaging protocol for evaluation of acute ischemic stroke: pushing the boundaries.

Authors:  Kambiz Nael; Rihan Khan; Gagandeep Choudhary; Arash Meshksar; Pablo Villablanca; Jennifer Tay; Kendra Drake; Bruce M Coull; Chelsea S Kidwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  Gadolinium Deposition in Brain: Current Scientific Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Bang J Guo; Zhen L Yang; Long J Zhang
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.