| Literature DB >> 32208772 |
Phoebe F Lamie1, John N Philoppes1.
Abstract
A novel 2-thiopyrimidine/Entities:
Keywords: 2-Thiopyrimidine; STAT; chalcone; computational analysis; cytotoxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32208772 PMCID: PMC7144330 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2020.1740922
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.The designed strategy for 2-TP/chalcone hybrids as new anticancer STAT inhibitors.
Scheme 1.Synthesis of 2-thiopyrimidine derivatives 4a–f.
Scheme 2.Synthesis of chloroacetyl aminochalcone derivatives 8a–c.
Scheme 3.Synthesis of the target compounds 9a–r.
Cytotoxicity results of pyrimidine/chalcone hybrids 9a–r against three different cancer cell lines.
| Compound | R | R1 | R2 | R3 | (IC50 μM)±SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-562 | MCF-7 | HT-29 | |||||
| OCH3 | CH3 | H | H | 18.40 ± 0.76 | 3.56 ± 0.14 | 2.20 ± 0.04 | |
| OCH3 | CH3 | CH3 | H | 3.62 ± 0.08 | 22.45 ± 1.57 | 16.36 ± 0.76 | |
| OCH3 | CH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 11.42 ± 0.04 | 4.25 ± 0.13 | 8.70 ± 0.28 | |
| OCH3 | NO2 | H | H | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 14.16 ± 0.74 | 25.92 ± 1.67 | |
| OCH3 | NO2 | OCH3 | H | 7.05 ± 0.28 | 18.74 ± 0.92 | 7.31 ± 0.36 | |
| OCH3 | NO2 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 1.37 ± 0.03 | 5.77 ± 0.22 | 9.41 ± 0.43 | |
| OCH3 | OCH2CH2Cl | H | H | 3.17 ± 0.11 | 10.40 ± 0.64 | 10.55 ± 0.47 | |
| OCH3 | OCH2CH2Cl | OCH3 | H | 7.07 ± 0.31 | 7.70 ± 0.32 | 18.77 ± 0.88 | |
| OCH3 | OCH2CH2Cl | OCH3 | OCH3 | 9.71 ± 0.41 | 11.47 ± 0.81 | 11.47 ± 0.23 | |
| Cl | CH3 | H | H | 4.26 ± 0.06 | 6.26 ± 0.24 | 6.26 ± 0.34 | |
| Cl | CH3 | OCH3 | H | 9.95 ± 0.29 | 28.65 ± 1.39 | 5.61 ± 0.18 | |
| Cl | CH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 42.60 ± 1.99 | 13.46 ± 0.62 | 2.37 ± 0.07 | |
| Cl | NO2 | H | H | 3.86 ± 0.14 | 3.90 ± 0.09 | 7.90 ± 0.22 | |
| Cl | NO2 | OCH3 | H | 1.05 ± 0.02 | 17.36 ± 0.75 | 2.10 ± 0.06 | |
| Cl | NO2 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 12.35 ± 0.72 | 3.62 ± 0.084 | 3.62 ± 0.08 | |
| Cl | OCH2CH2Cl | H | H | 1.74 ± 0.04 | 11.64 ± 0.49 | 11.64 ± 0.63 | |
| Cl | OCH2CH2Cl | OCH3 | H | 5.77 ± 0.16 | 6.81 ± 0.25 | 6.06 ± 0.29 | |
| Cl | OCH2CH2Cl | OCH3 | OCH3 | 10.67 ± 0.77 | 1.37 ± 0.07 | 4.74 ± 0.27 | |
| 2.31 ± 0.09 | 6.62 ± 0.29 | 1.12 ± 0.06 | |||||
| 9.85 ± 0.51 | 10.64 ± 0.58 | 9.20 ± 0.41 | |||||
Figure 2.Cytotoxicity (IC50) of the most active derivatives and cisplatin against WI38 cell line.
STAT3 and STAT5a inhibitory activity of compounds 9a, 9d, 9f, 9n, 9r and reference drug pacritinib.
| Compound/no. | Inhibition IC50 (µM) | |
|---|---|---|
| STAT3 | STAT5a | |
| 242.53 ± 9.24 | 83.78 ± 3.28 | |
| 160.01 ± 4.59 | 116.31 ± 4.13 | |
| 244.74 ± 11.07 | 77.65 ± 2.91 | |
| 113.31 ± 3.22 | 50.75 ± 1.26 | |
| 148.69 ± 3.81 | 63.24 ± 1.57 | |
| 79.47 ± 2.17 | 54.35 ± 1.09 | |
| 65.49 ± 2.55 | 69.81 ± 1.82 | |
Biological properties, prediction, and drug likeness of the target compounds.
| Compound | GPCR ligand | Ion channel modulator | Kinase inhibitor | Nuclear receptor ligand | Protease inhibitor | Drug likeness score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.43 | −1.03 | −0.58 | −0.69 | −0.43 | 0.49 | |
| −0.56 | −1.27 | −0.78 | −0.90 | −0.51 | 0.54 | |
| −0.73 | −1.55 | −1.01 | −1.17 | −0.62 | 0.96 | |
| −0.61 | −1.25 | −0.83 | −0.92 | −0.53 | 0.07 | |
| −0.78 | −1.53 | −1.07 | −1.17 | −0.65 | 0.11 | |
| −0.99 | −1.86 | −1.35 | −1.50 | −0.80 | 0.49 | |
| −0.69 | −1.44 | −0.81 | −1.01 | −0.56 | 0.83 | |
| −0.88 | −1.75 | −1.08 | −1.29 | −0.70 | 0.79 | |
| −1.11 | −2.09 | −1.39 | −1.64 | −0.87 | 1.18 | |
| −0.39 | −0.94 | −0.52 | −0.63 | −0.44 | 0.82 | |
| −0.50 | −1.16 | −0.68 | −0.81 | −0.50 | 0.80 | |
| −0.64 | −1.41 | −0.89 | −1.06 | −0.58 | 1.07 | |
| −0.55 | −1.13 | −0.75 | −0.83 | −0.52 | 0.43 | |
| −0.69 | −1.39 | −0.95 | −1.06 | −0.62 | 0.40 | |
| −0.88 | −1.69 | −1.21 | −1.36 | −0.74 | 0.63 | |
| −0.61 | −1.31 | −0.71 | −0.91 | −0.54 | 1.14 | |
| −0.79 | −1.60 | −0.96 | −1.17 | −0.66 | 1.05 | |
| −1.00 | −1.92 | −1.24 | −1.49 | −0.81 | 1.40 |
Figure 3.Drug likeness score value (1.40) for compound 9r.
Pharmacokinetic properties assessment of the target synthesised compounds 9a–r.
| Compound | Absorption | Distribution | Metabolism (CYP) and excretion | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIA (%) | SP LogP (cm/h) | Caco2 (nm/sc) | MDCK (nm/sc) | BBB (c.brain/c.blood) | PPB % | 2C19 | 2C9 | 2D6 | 3A4 | Pgp Inh. | |
| 97.50 | −1.72 | 54.34 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 98.31 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.36 | −1.73 | 54.31 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 99.63 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.25 | −1.74 | 54.26 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 97.83 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 98.78 | −2.26 | 28.65 | 0.04 | 0.49 | 92.53 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 99.22 | −2.25 | 29.60 | 0.04 | 0.45 | 96.23 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 99.39 | −2.22 | 30.34 | 0.04 | 0.38 | 96.95 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.69 | −2.09 | 37.98 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 92.10 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.54 | −2.03 | 38.68 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 95.16 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.42 | −1.96 | 39.36 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 95.17 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.95 | −1.74 | 51.82 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 90.94 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.83 | −1.74 | 52.19 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 94.17 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.69 | −1.73 | 52.52 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 94.05 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.49 | −2.28 | 33.88 | 0.04 | 0.37 | 93.03 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.96 | −2.28 | 35.90 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 91.43 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 98.56 | −2.27 | 37.81 | 0.04 | 0.57 | 92.17 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 98.11 | −2.14 | 42.99 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 92.90 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.99 | −2.10 | 43.47 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 91.65 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.86 | −2.05 | 43.93 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 91.71 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
Toxicity assessment of the target synthesised compounds 9a–r.
| Compound | AMES | Carcino-Mouse | Carcino-Rat | hERG-inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium |
Figure 4.SAR study of the target compounds 9a–r.