| Literature DB >> 32208772 |
Phoebe F Lamie1, John N Philoppes1.
Abstract
A novel 2-thiopyrimidine/chalcone hybrid was designed, synthesised, and evaluated for their cytotoxic activities against three different cell lines, K-562, MCF-7, and HT-29. The most active cytotoxic derivatives were 9d, 9f, 9n, and 9p (IC50=0.77-1.74 µM, against K-562 cell line), 9a and 9r (IC50=1.37-3.56 µM against MCF-7 cell line), and 9a, 9l, and 9n (IC50=2.10 and 2.37 µM against HT-29 cell line). Compounds 9a, 9d, 9f, 9n, and 9r were further evaluated for their cytotoxicity against normal fibroblast cell line WI38. Moreover, STAT3 and STAT5a inhibitory activities were determined for the most active derivatives 9a, 9d, 9f, 9n, and 9r. Dual inhibitory activity was observed in compound 9n (IC50=113.31 and 50.75 µM, against STAT3 and STAT5a, respectively). Prediction of physicochemical properties, drug likeness score, pharmacokinetic and toxic properties was detected.Entities:
Keywords: 2-Thiopyrimidine; STAT; chalcone; computational analysis; cytotoxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32208772 PMCID: PMC7144330 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2020.1740922
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem ISSN: 1475-6366 Impact factor: 5.051
Figure 1.The designed strategy for 2-TP/chalcone hybrids as new anticancer STAT inhibitors.
Scheme 1.Synthesis of 2-thiopyrimidine derivatives 4a–f.
Scheme 2.Synthesis of chloroacetyl aminochalcone derivatives 8a–c.
Scheme 3.Synthesis of the target compounds 9a–r.
Cytotoxicity results of pyrimidine/chalcone hybrids 9a–r against three different cancer cell lines.
| Compound | R | R1 | R2 | R3 | (IC50 μM)±SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-562 | MCF-7 | HT-29 | |||||
| OCH3 | CH3 | H | H | 18.40 ± 0.76 | 3.56 ± 0.14 | 2.20 ± 0.04 | |
| OCH3 | CH3 | CH3 | H | 3.62 ± 0.08 | 22.45 ± 1.57 | 16.36 ± 0.76 | |
| OCH3 | CH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 11.42 ± 0.04 | 4.25 ± 0.13 | 8.70 ± 0.28 | |
| OCH3 | NO2 | H | H | 0.77 ± 0.03 | 14.16 ± 0.74 | 25.92 ± 1.67 | |
| OCH3 | NO2 | OCH3 | H | 7.05 ± 0.28 | 18.74 ± 0.92 | 7.31 ± 0.36 | |
| OCH3 | NO2 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 1.37 ± 0.03 | 5.77 ± 0.22 | 9.41 ± 0.43 | |
| OCH3 | OCH2CH2Cl | H | H | 3.17 ± 0.11 | 10.40 ± 0.64 | 10.55 ± 0.47 | |
| OCH3 | OCH2CH2Cl | OCH3 | H | 7.07 ± 0.31 | 7.70 ± 0.32 | 18.77 ± 0.88 | |
| OCH3 | OCH2CH2Cl | OCH3 | OCH3 | 9.71 ± 0.41 | 11.47 ± 0.81 | 11.47 ± 0.23 | |
| Cl | CH3 | H | H | 4.26 ± 0.06 | 6.26 ± 0.24 | 6.26 ± 0.34 | |
| Cl | CH3 | OCH3 | H | 9.95 ± 0.29 | 28.65 ± 1.39 | 5.61 ± 0.18 | |
| Cl | CH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 42.60 ± 1.99 | 13.46 ± 0.62 | 2.37 ± 0.07 | |
| Cl | NO2 | H | H | 3.86 ± 0.14 | 3.90 ± 0.09 | 7.90 ± 0.22 | |
| Cl | NO2 | OCH3 | H | 1.05 ± 0.02 | 17.36 ± 0.75 | 2.10 ± 0.06 | |
| Cl | NO2 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 12.35 ± 0.72 | 3.62 ± 0.084 | 3.62 ± 0.08 | |
| Cl | OCH2CH2Cl | H | H | 1.74 ± 0.04 | 11.64 ± 0.49 | 11.64 ± 0.63 | |
| Cl | OCH2CH2Cl | OCH3 | H | 5.77 ± 0.16 | 6.81 ± 0.25 | 6.06 ± 0.29 | |
| Cl | OCH2CH2Cl | OCH3 | OCH3 | 10.67 ± 0.77 | 1.37 ± 0.07 | 4.74 ± 0.27 | |
| 2.31 ± 0.09 | 6.62 ± 0.29 | 1.12 ± 0.06 | |||||
| 9.85 ± 0.51 | 10.64 ± 0.58 | 9.20 ± 0.41 | |||||
Figure 2.Cytotoxicity (IC50) of the most active derivatives and cisplatin against WI38 cell line.
STAT3 and STAT5a inhibitory activity of compounds 9a, 9d, 9f, 9n, 9r and reference drug pacritinib.
| Compound/no. | Inhibition IC50 (µM) | |
|---|---|---|
| STAT3 | STAT5a | |
| 242.53 ± 9.24 | 83.78 ± 3.28 | |
| 160.01 ± 4.59 | 116.31 ± 4.13 | |
| 244.74 ± 11.07 | 77.65 ± 2.91 | |
| 113.31 ± 3.22 | 50.75 ± 1.26 | |
| 148.69 ± 3.81 | 63.24 ± 1.57 | |
| 79.47 ± 2.17 | 54.35 ± 1.09 | |
| 65.49 ± 2.55 | 69.81 ± 1.82 | |
Biological properties, prediction, and drug likeness of the target compounds.
| Compound | GPCR ligand | Ion channel modulator | Kinase inhibitor | Nuclear receptor ligand | Protease inhibitor | Drug likeness score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.43 | −1.03 | −0.58 | −0.69 | −0.43 | 0.49 | |
| −0.56 | −1.27 | −0.78 | −0.90 | −0.51 | 0.54 | |
| −0.73 | −1.55 | −1.01 | −1.17 | −0.62 | 0.96 | |
| −0.61 | −1.25 | −0.83 | −0.92 | −0.53 | 0.07 | |
| −0.78 | −1.53 | −1.07 | −1.17 | −0.65 | 0.11 | |
| −0.99 | −1.86 | −1.35 | −1.50 | −0.80 | 0.49 | |
| −0.69 | −1.44 | −0.81 | −1.01 | −0.56 | 0.83 | |
| −0.88 | −1.75 | −1.08 | −1.29 | −0.70 | 0.79 | |
| −1.11 | −2.09 | −1.39 | −1.64 | −0.87 | 1.18 | |
| −0.39 | −0.94 | −0.52 | −0.63 | −0.44 | 0.82 | |
| −0.50 | −1.16 | −0.68 | −0.81 | −0.50 | 0.80 | |
| −0.64 | −1.41 | −0.89 | −1.06 | −0.58 | 1.07 | |
| −0.55 | −1.13 | −0.75 | −0.83 | −0.52 | 0.43 | |
| −0.69 | −1.39 | −0.95 | −1.06 | −0.62 | 0.40 | |
| −0.88 | −1.69 | −1.21 | −1.36 | −0.74 | 0.63 | |
| −0.61 | −1.31 | −0.71 | −0.91 | −0.54 | 1.14 | |
| −0.79 | −1.60 | −0.96 | −1.17 | −0.66 | 1.05 | |
| −1.00 | −1.92 | −1.24 | −1.49 | −0.81 | 1.40 |
Figure 3.Drug likeness score value (1.40) for compound 9r.
Pharmacokinetic properties assessment of the target synthesised compounds 9a–r.
| Compound | Absorption | Distribution | Metabolism (CYP) and excretion | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIA (%) | SP LogP (cm/h) | Caco2 (nm/sc) | MDCK (nm/sc) | BBB (c.brain/c.blood) | PPB % | 2C19 | 2C9 | 2D6 | 3A4 | Pgp Inh. | |
| 97.50 | −1.72 | 54.34 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 98.31 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.36 | −1.73 | 54.31 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 99.63 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.25 | −1.74 | 54.26 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 97.83 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 98.78 | −2.26 | 28.65 | 0.04 | 0.49 | 92.53 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 99.22 | −2.25 | 29.60 | 0.04 | 0.45 | 96.23 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 99.39 | −2.22 | 30.34 | 0.04 | 0.38 | 96.95 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.69 | −2.09 | 37.98 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 92.10 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.54 | −2.03 | 38.68 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 95.16 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.42 | −1.96 | 39.36 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 95.17 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.95 | −1.74 | 51.82 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 90.94 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.83 | −1.74 | 52.19 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 94.17 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.69 | −1.73 | 52.52 | 0.07 | 0.04 | 94.05 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.49 | −2.28 | 33.88 | 0.04 | 0.37 | 93.03 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.96 | −2.28 | 35.90 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 91.43 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 98.56 | −2.27 | 37.81 | 0.04 | 0.57 | 92.17 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 98.11 | −2.14 | 42.99 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 92.90 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.99 | −2.10 | 43.47 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 91.65 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
| 97.86 | −2.05 | 43.93 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 91.71 | No | Yes | No | Yes | Inh. | |
Toxicity assessment of the target synthesised compounds 9a–r.
| Compound | AMES | Carcino-Mouse | Carcino-Rat | hERG-inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium | |
| Non-mutagen | Negative | Negative | Medium |
Figure 4.SAR study of the target compounds 9a–r.