Literature DB >> 32208092

Implementing Decision Coaching for Lung Cancer Screening in the Low-Dose Computed Tomography Setting.

Lisa M Lowenstein1, Myrna Cobos Barco Godoy2, Jeremy J Erasmus2, Zineb Zirari1, Alina Bennett3, Viola B Leal1, Ashley J Housten1, Robert J Volk1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The uptake of shared decision making (SDM) for lung cancer screening (LCS) as required by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is suboptimal. Alternative models for delivering SDM are needed, such as decision coaching in the low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Replicating Effective Programs framework guided our implementation of decision coaching, which included a patient-facilitated component before screening followed by in-person coaching that addressed the required elements for the SDM visit from CMS. We surveyed two LCS patient cohorts (pre-implementation and implementation of decision coaching) about their knowledge of LCS and perception of the SDM process. We conducted time-motion studies to assess the feasibility of implementing decision coaching and audio recorded clinical encounters from the implementation cohort to assess fidelity of the SDM conversation to the CMS requirements.
RESULTS: Compared with the pre-implementation cohort (n = 51), the implementation cohort (n = 30) had greater knowledge of LCS (P < .01) and reported a better SDM process (P = .01). Coaching took 7.6 ± 4.1 minutes and did not increase visit time (P = .72). Coaches addressed an average of 6.4 of 7 SDM elements required by CMS.
CONCLUSION: Decision coaching in the LDCT setting provides an opportunity for patients to confirm their screening decision by ensuring that patients are truly informed about the potential harms and benefits of LCS. The decision coaching had excellent fidelity in addressing the required SDM elements from CMS and is feasible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32208092      PMCID: PMC7427416          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.19.00453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract        ISSN: 2688-1527


  28 in total

1.  Rebuttal From Dr Powell.

Authors:  Charles A Powell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  POINT: Should Only Primary Care Physicians Provide Shared Decision-making Services to Discuss the Risks/Benefits of a Low-Dose Chest CT Scan for Lung Cancer Screening? Yes.

Authors:  John D Goodson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Use of CT and Chest Radiography for Lung Cancer Screening Before and After Publication of Screening Guidelines: Intended and Unintended Uptake.

Authors:  Jinhai Huo; Chan Shen; Robert J Volk; Ya-Chen Tina Shih
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Impact of a Lung Cancer Screening Counseling and Shared Decision-Making Visit.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Amanda Tenenbaum; Meredith Seeley; Hilary Petersen; Christina Lyon; Xiaozhen Han; Xiao-Feng Wang
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  A demonstration of shared decision making in primary care highlights barriers to adoption and potential remedies.

Authors:  Mark W Friedberg; Kristin Van Busum; Richard Wexler; Megan Bowen; Eric C Schneider
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Decision coaching to support shared decision making: a framework, evidence, and implications for nursing practice, education, and policy.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Mary Ann Murray; France Légaré; Dunn Sandy; Prudy Menard; Annette O'Connor
Journal:  Worldviews Evid Based Nurs       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process.

Authors:  Paul James Barr; Rachel Thompson; Thom Walsh; Stuart W Grande; Elissa M Ozanne; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: application of the replicating effective programs framework.

Authors:  Amy M Kilbourne; Mary S Neumann; Harold A Pincus; Mark S Bauer; Ronald Stall
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 9.  Coaching and guidance with patient decision aids: A review of theoretical and empirical evidence.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Jeff Belkora; B Joyce Davison; Marie-Anne Durand; Karen B Eden; Aubri S Hoffman; Mirjam Koerner; France Légaré; Marie-Chantal Loiselle; Richard L Street
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Readiness of primary care clinicians to implement lung cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Lewis E Foxhall
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015-08-24
View more
  3 in total

1.  Outcomes of Shared Decision-Making for Low-Dose Screening for Lung Cancer in an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Anja Zgodic; Scott C Pelland; Stephanie Y Wang; David P Miller
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Understanding how and under what circumstances decision coaching works for people making healthcare decisions: a realist review.

Authors:  Junqiang Zhao; Janet Jull; Jeanette Finderup; Maureen Smith; Simone Maria Kienlin; Anne Christin Rahn; Sandra Dunn; Yumi Aoki; Leanne Brown; Gillian Harvey; Dawn Stacey
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.298

3.  Shared Decision-making in Urologic Practice: Results From the 2019 AUA Census.

Authors:  Giulia Ippolito Lane; Chad Ellimoottil; Lauren Wallner; William Meeks; Rachel Mbassa; James Quentin Clemens
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.649

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.