| Literature DB >> 32207882 |
Enrico Orsi1, Jules Beekwilder2, Dewi van Gelder1, Adèle van Houwelingen2, Gerrit Eggink1,3, Servé W M Kengen4, Ruud A Weusthuis1.
Abstract
Advances in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering have proven the potential of introducing metabolic by-passes within cell factories. These pathways can provide a more efficient alternative to endogenous counterparts due to their insensitivity to host's regulatory mechanisms. In this work, we replaced the endogenous essential 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis in the industrially relevant bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides by an orthogonal metabolic route. The native 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol 4-phosphate (MEP) pathway was successfully replaced by a heterologous mevalonate (MVA) pathway from a related bacterium. The functional replacement was confirmed by analysis of the reporter molecule amorpha-4,11-diene after cultivation with [4-13 C]glucose. The engineered R. sphaeroides strain relying exclusively on the MVA pathway was completely functional in conditions for sesquiterpene production and, upon increased expression of the MVA enzymes, it reached even higher sesquiterpene yields than the control strain coexpressing both MEP and MVA modules. This work represents an example where substitution of an essential biochemical pathway by an alternative, heterologous pathway leads to enhanced biosynthetic performance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32207882 PMCID: PMC7264872 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 5.813
Fig. 1Overview of the strategy for isoprenoid pathway replacement in Rhodobacter sphaeroides.
A. representation of the two isoprenoid modules 2‐C‐methyl‐D‐erythritol 4‐phosphate (MEP, blue arrows) and mevalonate (MVA, orange arrows). Both modules branch from the central metabolism (black arrows) and converge to isopentenyl‐diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl‐diphosphate (DMAPP), which are the precursors of all terpenoids (some listed below DMAPP). MVA pathway requires NADPH as cofactor, while the endogenous MEP additionally requires reduced flavodoxin (Fld) or ferredoxin (Fd) for its functioning (red: reduced, ox: oxidized). The proposed position for inactivation of the native MEP pathway is also shown and corresponds to the enzyme 1‐deoxy‐D‐xylulose 5‐phosphate reductoisomerase (Dxr, red cross). Its substrate 1‐deoxy‐D‐xylulose 5‐phosphate (DXP) is also involved in thiamine biosynthesis (black dashed line). The last step of the MEP pathway is catalysed by 4‐hydroxy‐3‐methylbut‐2‐enyl diphosphate (HMBPP) reductase (IspH). For this enzyme, the Gibbs free energy under standard conditions was calculated (in blue). The highly negative ΔrG’0 of the reaction (−62.5 ± 6.4 kJ mol−1) indicates irreversibility of its enzymatic activity. On the other hand, introduction of the MVA module requires the correct functioning of 6 enzymes (numbered in orange).
B. overview of the operon including the target gene dxr. All the other genes included are involved in growth‐related functions (see Table S3 for more information).
C. overview of the MVA operon from the α‐proteobacterium Paracoccus zeaxanthinifaciens used for integration via mini transposon system pUT‐Mini‐Tn5‐Sp/Sm. The numbers below the genes represent their position in the pathway depicted in panel A), while Sp/SmR refers to spectinomycin/streptomycin resistance. The image is adapted from(Hümbelin et al., 2002). Other abbreviations: GAP (glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate), PYR (pyruvate), CDP‐ME (4‐(cytidine 5'‐diphospho)‐2‐C‐methyl‐D‐erythritol), CDP‐MEP (2‐phospho‐4‐(cytidine 5'‐diphospho)‐2‐C‐methyl‐D‐erythritol), MEcPP (2‐C‐methyl‐D‐erythritol 2,4‐cyclodiphosphate), pyrF (uridylate kinase, gene), frr (ribosome recycling factor, gene), uppS (undecaprenyl‐diphosphate synthase, gene), cdsA (phosphatidate cytidylyltransferase, gene), rseP (Regulator of sigma E protease, gene) Ac‐CoA (acetyl‐CoA), AA‐CoA (acetoacetyl‐CoA), HMG‐CoA (S)‐3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl‐CoA), MVA‐P ((R)‐5‐phosphomevalonate), MVA‐PP ((R)‐5‐diphosphomevalonate), mvaA (HMG‐CoA reductase, gene), idi (IPP isomerase, gene), hcs (HMG‐CoA synthase, gene), mvk (mevalonate kinase, gene), pmk (phosphomevalonate kinase, gene), mvd (MVA‐PP decarboxylase, gene).
Fig. 2Effect of isoprenoid pathways replacement on physiological parameters in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Comparison of (A) relative valencene titres between Rs265 + pBBR‐CnVs and the average of 15 biological replicates Rs265‐MVA + pBBR‐CnVS obtained after transposon insertion of the MVA operon. Bars show the average between the replicates ± SD of the replicates. Comparison of (B) growth rates and (C) biomass concentration after 24 h cultivation on defined medium. The Rs265 strains tested are wild type (wt), integrated mevalonate (MVA) and Δdxr on MVA integrated background (MVA‐Δdxr). Strains were tested before and after the addition of extra copies of the MVA module on a plasmid (pBBR‐ads, light blue and pBBR‐MVA‐ads, dark blue).
(D) Effect of MVA pathway integration and 2‐C‐methyl‐D‐erythritol 4‐phosphate (MEP) pathway inactivation on amorphadiene titres. The strains tested were incubated for 24 h, and amorphadiene was measured at the end of the cultivation. The measurement includes the biological replicates 5, 6 and 7 obtained after transposon insertion of the MVA pathway (panel a). As for (B) and (C), also here the wt strain was compared with strains coexpressing isoprenoid modules (MVA) or the MVA module exclusively (MVA‐Δdxr). Unless expressed differently, the error bars are obtained from averages between at least biological triplicates. Significant differences are marked by either one or two asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). They were evaluated by comparing the set of replicates for the mutants Rs265‐MVA (MVA) and Rs265‐MVA‐Δdxr (MVA‐Δdxr) to the replicates obtained by the Rs265 (wt) strain by means of Student's t‐test.
Fig. 3Effect of isoprenoid pathways replacement on biosynthesis of endogenous terpenoids. Accumulation of endogenous terpenoids in Rhodobacter sphaeroides Rs265 relying exclusively on the native MEP pathway (wt), or on the heterologous mevalonate pathway (MVA‐Δdxr). The values represent the relative comparisons of MVA‐Δdxr to the wt control for several endogenous terpenoids (mentioned above each chart). Both MVA‐Δdxr and wt genotypes were tested before and after the addition of extra copies of the MVA module on a multicopy plasmid (pBBR‐ads, light blue, and pBBR‐MVA‐ads, dark blue). Titres were measured after 24 h incubation on defined medium supplied with glucose. Errors represent the standard deviations between biological triplicates. Significant differences are marked by two asterisks (**P < 0.01). They were evaluated by comparing the set of replicates for the mutants Rs265‐MVA‐Δdxr to the replicates obtained by the Rs265 (wt) strain by means of Student's t‐test.
Fig. 4Comparison of amorphadiene mass distribution vectors (MDVs) after [413C]glucose cultivation (A) Schematic representation of 13C atoms incorporation in amorphadiene after [4‐13C]glucose cultivation. Glycolysis in Rhodobacter sphaeroides will generate 1 molecule of glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate (GAP) and 1 molecule of pyruvate (PYR) per glucose consumed. Additionally, GAP can be converted to PYR by the lower glycolysis. In case of isopentenyl‐pyrophosphate (IPP) biosynthesis via the MEP pathway, the 13C atom from GAP will be maintained within the carbon backbone. Differently, when PYR is converted to acetyl‐CoA (Ac‐CoA), the decarboxylation step results in 13C atom removal from the carbon skeleton. Therefore, the IPP and dimethylallyl‐diphosphate (DMAPP) molecules generated via the MVA pathway will be unlabelled, whereas they will maintain the 13C atom if generated from MEP. Eventually, three molecules of IPP and DMAPP are condensed in one molecule of amorphadiene, whose isotopes spectra will be analysed by GC‐MS.
B. Qualitative comparison between the MDVs of the secreted amorphadiene after [4‐13C]glucose cultivation. Due to the presence of three labelled IPP/DMAPP units, the strain exclusively expressing the MEP pathway (Rs265 + pBBR‐ads) shows the highest density of 13C incorporation within its backbone as a shift of M + 3 in m/z. The relative amount of 13C within amorphadiene decreases when the two modules are coexpressed due to the presence of unlabelled IPP/DMAPP units in amorphadiene (Rs265‐MVA + pBBR‐ads). Eventually, the amount of 13C incorporated when only MVA is active (Rs265‐MVA‐Δdxr + pBBR‐ads) equals the natural distribution of 13C that is incorporated by a strain relying on MEP exclusively grown on [12C]glucose (white bars). Error bars represent the standard deviation of biological triplicates.
Fig. 5Effect of increasing enzyme copies of the MVA module on amorphadiene yield. Comparison of amorphadiene yields on glucose after 24 h incubation on defined medium. The parental strain coexpressing the native endogenous MEP pathway and the integrated mevalonate module (Rs265‐MVA) is compared with the three biological replicates of the knockout strains exclusively relying on the orthogonal MVA module (Rs265‐MVA‐Δdxr #5, 6 and 7). For all the strains, the yields were compared between strains relying exclusively on the integrated MVA module (pBB‐ads, light blue) and others expressing additional MVA copies on a multicopy plasmid (pBBR‐MVA‐ads, dark blue). The error bars represent the standard deviations of biological triplicates. Significant differences are marked by either one or two asterisks (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01). They were evaluated by comparing the set of replicates for the mutants Rs265‐MVA‐Δdxr to the replicates obtained by the Rs265‐MVA strain by means of Student's t‐test.