Literature DB >> 32207186

Are small renal masses all the same?

Yu Guang Tan1, Mohamad Farhan Bin Khalid2, Andre Villanueva2, Hong Hong Huang1, Kenneth Chen1, Allen Soon Phang Sim1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate variables that can predict synchronous metastasis in patients presenting with small renal masses.
METHODS: We reviewed our institution's prospectively maintained database of 565 patients diagnosed with small renal masses (≤4 cm) over a 16-year period. Variables associated with synchronous metastasis and subsequent relapse were analyzed using χ2 and logistic regression models.
RESULTS: A total of 16 patients (2.7%) presented with synchronous metastasis. Just three patients with tumor size <3 cm had metastatic disease at presentation. On multivariate analyses, tumor size >3 cm, symptomatic cancer, age >65 years and ipsilateral synchronous tumors were independent predictors of M1 renal cell carcinoma. A weighted predictive model (concordance index 0.786) showed that a score ≥2 significantly increases the risk of synchronous metastasis (7.9% vs <1% for score <2, P < 0.01, hazard ratio 12.56, 95% confidence interval 5.52-22.85). A total of 498 (90.7%) patients underwent nephrectomies, 27 (4.9%) had ablative therapies and 24 (4.4%) continued on active surveillance/watchful waiting. Over a median follow-up period of 62.8 months, 30 patients (6.1%) had disease recurrence. On multivariate analyses, higher Fuhrman grade and lymphovascular invasion were independent predictors of recurrence. A separate predictive model (concordance index 0.723) showed that either pathological outcome increases recurrence risk up to 15% (P < 0.01, hazard ratio 11.83, 95% confidence interval 5.82-18.76).
CONCLUSIONS: Several clinical variables can better identify the metastatic potential of small renal masses. The two proposed predictive models can be valuable tools in future clinical practice.
© 2020 The Japanese Urological Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  kidney cancer; metastasis; recurrence; renal cell carcinoma; small renal mass

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32207186     DOI: 10.1111/iju.14219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Urol        ISSN: 0919-8172            Impact factor:   3.369


  3 in total

1.  Predictive Factors Affecting Metastasis of Small Renal Mass and Its Prognostic Analysis.

Authors:  Wei He; Zhuo Liu; Yu Tian; Yuxuan Li; Chuxiao Xu; Ruotao Xiao; Peng Hong; Shiying Tang; Liyuan Ge; Xun Zhao; Guodong Zhu; Hongxian Zhang; Cheng Liu; Lulin Ma
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2022-02-17

2.  Clinical T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma, Not Always a Harmless Disease-A National Register Study.

Authors:  Tarik Almdalal; Pernilla Sundqvist; Ulrika Harmenberg; Mikael Hellström; Magnus Lindskog; Per Lindblad; Svan Lundstam; Börje Ljungberg
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Differential diagnosis and prognosis of small renal masses: association with collateral vessels detected using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  Masato Yanagi; Tomonari Kiriyama; Jun Akatsuka; Yuki Endo; Hayato Takeda; Akifumi Katsu; Yuichiro Honda; Kyota Suzuki; Yoshihiro Nishikawa; Shunsuke Ikuma; Hikaru Mikami; Yuka Toyama; Go Kimura; Yukihiro Kondo
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.638

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.