| Literature DB >> 32206470 |
Ioanna Mastroleon1, Laskarina-Maria Korou1, Vasilios Pergialiotis1, Ioannis S Vlachos1, Helen Sarlanis2, Panagiotis Konstantopoulos1, Emmanouil Pikoulis3, Despina N Perrea1, Nikolaos Kavantzas4.
Abstract
Caffeine is the most widely consumed psychoactive substance, with recommendations from health associations and regulatory bodies for limiting caffeine consumption during pregnancy being increasingly common. Prenatal exposure to caffeine has been shown to increase the risk of developing abnormalities in lipid metabolism in adult life. We further investigated the effect of prenatal caffeine exposure (PCE) (20 mg/kg of body weight) on the metabolic "reserve" of male Sprague Dawley offspring fed on a high fructose diet in adult life. Male adult PCE offspring were assigned to four groups; Nw and Nf: offspring of control mothers (N group of mothers), having received tap water or high fructose water respectively; Cw and Cf: offspring exposed to caffeine during gestation (C group of mothers) and receiving tap water or a high fructose water solution, respectively. Cf rats presented increased serum triglyceride level, as well as raised systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels, together with extensive renal tissue oedema in adulthood, compared to the other groups (p<0.05 for all comparisons). These findings show further evidence for potential detrimental metabolic effects of prenatal caffeine exposure during adulthood in this animal model.Entities:
Keywords: blood pressure; caffeine; gestation; lipids; rat
Year: 2020 PMID: 32206470 PMCID: PMC7077745 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.7006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cureus ISSN: 2168-8184
Figure 1Schematic presentation of the experimental design
Serum glucose levels (mg/dl) recorded following the glucose tolerance tests (GTT0, GTT30, GTT60, GTT120) and at T1, T2 and T3; and serum levels of total cholesterol (mg/dl), HDL cholesterol (mg/dl), LDL cholesterol (mg/dl), triglycerides (mg/dl) and blood pressure (systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure) levels per animal group studied (Nw, Nf, Cw, Cf) at T1, T2, and T3
Data are expressed as median (range). P-values marked with (*) show a statistically significant difference (p<0.05).
Post hoc analysis to determine differences among groups for the Kruskal-Wallis analysis: Figures sharing the same superscript letters differentiate significantly from each other.
TGL (T2): 1) Nw vs Nf P=0.025, 2) Nw vs Cf p=0.001, 3) Nf vs Cw p=0.045, 4) Cw vs Cf p=0.004
TGL (T3): 1) Nw vs Nf p=0.015, 2) Nw vs Cf p=0.001, 3) Nf vs Cw p=0.002, 4) Nf vs Cf p=0.037, 5) Cw vs Cf p<0.001
LDL (T2): 1) Nw vs Cw p=0.052, 2) Nw vs Cf p=0.015, 3) Cw vs Cf p=0.001
Systolic blood pressure: 1) Nw vs Nf p<0.001, 2) Nw vs Cw p<0.001, 3) Nw vs Cf p<0.001, 4) Nf vs Cw p=0.025, 5) Nf vs Cf p=0.019, 6) Cw vs Cf p<0.001
Diastolic blood pressure: 1) Nw vs Nf p=0.002, 2) Nw vs Cf p<0.001, 3) Nf vs Cw p=0.041, 4) Nf vs Cf p=0.053, 5) Cw vs Cf p=0.005
Weight (T3): 1) Nf vs Cw p=0.041, 2) Cw vs Cf p=0.005
Nw group - offspring of control mothers receiving tap water
Nf group - offspring of control mothers receiving high fructose water
Cw - offspring exposed to caffeine during gestation receiving tap water
Cf - offspring exposed to caffeine during gestation receiving high fructose water
GTT - glucose tolerance test; HDL - high-density lipoprotein; LDL - low-density lipoprotein
| Variable | Nw group | Nf group | Cw group | Cf group | p-value (Kruskal-Wallis) |
| GTT 0 | 100 (85-122) | 95 (71-129) | 105.5 (58-131) | 108 (61-130) | 0.829 |
| GTT 30 | 171.5 (122-281) | 223 (176-321) | 215 (95-386) | 210.5 (134-352) | 0.349 |
| GTT 60 | 129 (90-162) | 151.5 (114-201) | 124 (95-283) | 175.5 (100-220) | 0.089 |
| GTT 120 | 111 (83-123) | 120 (84-147) | 99 (84-189) | 114.5 (84-145) | 0.337 |
| Glucose T1 | 140 (130-165) | 145 (120-200) | 147.5 (120-170) | 147.5 (120-170) | 0.731 |
| Glucose T2 | 150 (140-180) | 155 (120-175) | 155 (125-180) | 157.5 (145-190) | 0.607 |
| Glucose T3 | 177.5 (135-220) | 180 (138-230) | 187.5 (165-210) | 195 (168-240) | 0.401 |
| p-value (Friedman) | 0.001 | 0.007 | <0.001 | 0.001 | |
| Total cholesterol (T 1) | 99.5 (85-110) | 105 (90-120) | 95 (80-110) | 97.5 (80-115) | 0.171 |
| Total cholesterol (T2) | 82.5 (70-100) | 82.5 (70-120) | 82.5 (80-100) | 80 (65-90) | 0.473 |
| Total cholesterol (T3) | 75 (60-100) | 85 (65-100) | 80 (65-95) | 75 (65-95) | 0.705 |
| p-value (Friedman) | 0.001 | 0.013 | 0.002 | <0.001 | |
| Triglycerides (T1) | 63 (45-95) | 70 (50-126) | 77.5 (60-120) | 80 (60-140) | 0.254 |
| Triglycerides (T2) | 87.5 (65-115) a,b | 112.5 (60-195) a,c | 82.5 (45-150) c,d | 140 (90-190) b,d | 0.002 * |
| Triglycerides (T3) | 70 (40-105) a,b | 97.5 (60-150) a,c,d | 65 (40-80) c,e | 150 (80-240) b,d,e | <0.001 * |
| p-value (Friedman) | 0.053 | 0.266 | 0.020 | 0.012 | |
| HDL (T1) | 53 (46-61) | 56 (48-65) | 51.5 (45-59) | 53 (46-60) | 0.284 |
| HDL (T2) | 54 (46-60) | 55.5 (49-66) | 75 (46-150) | 56.5 (47-190) | 0.572 |
| HDL (T3) | 54 (46-60) | 54.5 (48-65) | 50.5 (40-58) | 53 (46-59) | 0.249 |
| p-value (Friedman) | 0.168 | 0.053 | 0.001 | 0.010 | |
| LDL (T1) | 31 (21-37) | 35 (14-43) | 29 (11-38) | 60 (6-36) | 0.269 |
| LDL (T2) | 10 (5-22) a,b | 10 (1-38) | 17 (8-31) a,c | 5 (2-17) b,c | 0.013 * |
| LDL (T3) | 10 (0-21) | 5 (2-26) | 16 (4-22) | 12.5 (0-24) | 0.328 |
| p-value (Friedman) | 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.050 | 0.023 | |
| Systolic blood pressure | 135 (122-143) a,b,c | 152 (148-162) a,d,e | 144 (140-155) b,d,f | 160.5 (152-174) c,e,f | <0.001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 106 (80-117) a,b | 120.5 (107-139) a,c,d | 106 (88-138) c,e | 130 (112-143) b,d,e | <0.001 |
| Weight (T1) | 336 (296-360) | 337 (296-378) | 317 (264-352) | 344 (310-380) | 0.131 |
| Weight (T2) | 414 (378-450) | 400 (366-458) | 388 (348-410) | 403 (392-456) | 0.148 |
| Weight (T3) | 444 (404-460) | 446 (370-512) a | 418 (368-456) a,b | 442 (406-494) b | 0.042 * |
Food consumption (g/day) and water intake (ml/day) per animal group studied at T1, T2, and T3
Data are expressed as median (interquartile range).
Post hoc analysis to determine differences among groups for the Kruskal-Wallis analysis: Figures sharing the same superscript letters differentiate significantly from each other.
Food Consumption T1: Nw vs Cf, P=0.002; Cw vs Cf, P<0.001 T2: Nw vs Nf, P=0.03; Nw vs Cf, P<0.001; Cw vs Cf, P<0.001 T3: Nw vs Nf, P<0.001; Nw vs Cw, P=0.012; Nw vs Cf, P<0.001; Cw vs Cf, P<0.001
Water intake T1: Nw vs Nf, P<0.001; Cw vs Cf, P<0.001; Nf vs Cw, P<0.001 T2: Nw vs Nf, P<0.001; Cw vs Cf, P<0.001; Nf vs Cw, P<0.001; Nw vs Cf, P<0.001 T3: Nw vs Nf, P<0.001; Cw vs Cf, P<0.001; Nf vs Cw, P<0.001; Nw vs Cf, P<0.001
Nw group - offspring of control mothers receiving tap water
Nf group - offspring of control mothers receiving high fructose water
Cw - offspring exposed to caffeine during gestation receiving tap water
Cf - offspring exposed to caffeine during gestation receiving high fructose water
| Nw | Nf | Cw | Cf | ||
| Food Consumption (g/day) | T1 | 31 (11) a | 31 (18.2) | 28 (5) b | 15 (3.2) a,b |
| T2 | 27 (2) a,b | 26 (10.5) a | 26 (2.25) c | 16 (6) b, c | |
| T3 | 27 (2.75) a,b | 14 (5.25) a | 25 (2) c | 14.5 (1.5) b,c | |
| Water Intake (ml/day) | T1 | 34.5 (5.75) a | 52 (25.25) a,b | 34.5 (1.5) b,c | 57 (8.25) c |
| T2 | 34 (4.75) a,b | 85 (21.75) a,c | 33 (6.75) c,d | 84 (6.5) b,d | |
| T3 | 34 (1.75) a,b | 84 (18) a,c | 35.5 (6.25) c,d | 84 (18.5) b,d |
Analysis of histopathologic examination of renal and hepatic tissue samples, in relation to the presence or absence of oedema or swelling
Figures sharing the same superscript letters differentiate significantly from each other.
Renal tissue oedema: Nw vs Cw, P=0.033 and Nw vs Cf, P=0.003
Nw group - offspring of control mothers receiving tap water
Nf group - offspring of control mothers receiving high fructose water
Cw - offspring exposed to caffeine during gestation receiving tap water
Cf - offspring exposed to caffeine during gestation receiving high fructose water
| Lesion in renal or hepatic tissue | Number of animals per group presented as percentage (%) | ||||
| Nw (%) | Nf (%) | Cw (%) | Cf (%) | ||
| Oedema in renal tissue | Presence | 0a,b | 40 | 50a | 70b |
| Swelling in renal tissue | Presence | 30 | 10 | 50 | 30 |
| Oedema in hepatic tissue | Presence | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Swelling in hepatic tissue | Presence | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 2Haematoxylin/Eosin stains of renal tissues
A. Males born of control mothers which received tap water; B. Males born of control mothers, which received a high fructose water solution (200 g/l) daily instead of tap water; C. Males prenatally exposed to caffeine which received tap water; D. Males prenatally exposed to caffeine which received a high fructose water solution (200 g/l) daily instead of tap water. The arrow in Figure C indicates hydropic degeneration of tubular epithelium. The encircled area in Figure C and the whole area in Figure D present tissue with interstitial oedema. (A, C: 100x, B, D: 50x)