Literature DB >> 32206411

Testing a phantom eye under various signal-to-noise ratio conditions using eleven different OCT devices.

Tuomas Heikka1,2, Giovanni Ometto3,4,2, Giovanni Montesano3,4, Scott Rowe5, Nomdo M Jansonius1, David P Crabb3.   

Abstract

We compared eleven OCT devices in their ability to quantify retinal layer thicknesses under different signal-strength conditions, using a commercially available phantom eye. We analyzed a medium-intensity 50 µm layer in an identical manner for all devices, using the provided log-scale images and a reconstructed linear-scale tissue reflectivity metric. Thickness measurements were highly comparable when the data were analyzed in an identical manner. With optimal signal strength, the thickness of the 50 µm layer was overestimated by a mean of 4.3 µm in the log-scale images and of 2.7 µm in the linear-scale images.
© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32206411      PMCID: PMC7075602          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.383103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  26 in total

1.  Fabrication of healthy and disease-mimicking retinal phantoms with tapered foveal pits for optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Gary C F Lee; Gennifer T Smith; Monica Agrawal; Theodore Leng; Audrey K Ellerbee
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Review of tissue simulating phantoms for optical spectroscopy, imaging and dosimetry.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Michael S Patterson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer measurement and signal strength in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Carol Yim Lui Cheung; Christopher Kai Shun Leung; Dusheung Lin; Chi-Pui Pang; Dennis Shun Chiu Lam
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Retina-simulating phantom for optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jigesh Baxi; William Calhoun; Yasir Jamal Sepah; Daniel X Hammer; Ilko Ilev; T Joshua Pfefer; Quan Dong Nguyen; Anant Agrawal
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Refractive index correction in optical coherence tomography images of multilayer tissues.

Authors:  Zahra Turani; Emad Fatemizadeh; Qiuyun Xu; Steven Daveluy; Darius Mehregan; Mohammad Reza Nasiri Avanaki
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography systems using a phantom eye model.

Authors:  Roy de Kinkelder; Daniel M de Bruin; Frank D Verbraak; Ton G van Leeuwen; Dirk J Faber
Journal:  J Biophotonics       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.207

7.  Macular and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in normal eyes with the Stratus OCT, the Cirrus HD-OCT, and the Topcon 3D OCT-1000.

Authors:  Jingjing Huang; Xing Liu; Ziqiang Wu; Xinxing Guo; Hongzhi Xu; Laurie Dustin; Srinivas Sadda
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Projection-resolved optical coherence tomographic angiography.

Authors:  Miao Zhang; Thomas S Hwang; J Peter Campbell; Steven T Bailey; David J Wilson; David Huang; Yali Jia
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  The relationship between the optical density of cataract and its influence on retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Pauline H B Kok; Thomas J T P van den Berg; Hille W van Dijk; Marilette Stehouwer; Ivanka J E van der Meulen; Maarten P Mourits; Frank D Verbraak
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.761

10.  Optic Nerve Head Measurements With Optical Coherence Tomography: A Phantom-Based Study Reveals Differences Among Clinical Devices.

Authors:  Anant Agrawal; Jigesh Baxi; William Calhoun; Chieh-Li Chen; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman; Gadi Wollstein; Daniel X Hammer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  1 in total

1.  Structure-Function Analysis in Macular Drusen With Mesopic and Scotopic Microperimetry.

Authors:  Giovanni Montesano; Giovanni Ometto; Bethany E Higgins; Costanza Iester; Konstantinos Balaskas; Adnan Tufail; Usha Chakravarthy; Ruth E Hogg; David P Crabb
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 3.283

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.