Literature DB >> 32205622

Reporting of Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Studies of Interventions to Prevent and/or Treat Delirium in the Critically Ill: A Systematic Review.

Louise Rose1,2, Meera Agar3, Lisa Burry4,5, Noll Campbell6, Mike Clarke7, Jacques Lee8, John Marshall9, Najma Siddiqi10, Valerie Page11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To inform development of a core outcome set, we evaluated the scope and variability of outcomes, definitions, measures, and measurement time-points in published clinical trials of pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic interventions, including quality improvement projects, to prevent and/or treat delirium in the critically ill. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases, systematic review repositories, and trial registries (1980 to March 2019). STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: We included randomized, quasi-randomized, and nonrandomized intervention studies of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. We extracted data on study characteristics, verbatim descriptions of study outcomes, and measurement characteristics. We assessed quality of outcome reporting using the Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Children with Cleft Palate study scoring system; risk of bias and study quality using the Cochrane tool and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklists. We categorized reported outcomes using Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy. DATA SYNTHESIS: From 195 studies (1/195 pediatric) recruiting 74,632 participants and reporting a mean (SD) of 10 (6.2) outcome domains, we identified 12 delirium-specific outcome domains. Delirium incidence (147, 75% of studies), duration (67, 34%), and antipsychotic use (42, 22%) were most commonly reported. We identified a further 94 non-delirium-specific outcome domains within 19 Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy categories. For both delirium-specific and nonspecific outcome domains, we found multiple outcomes in domains due to differing descriptions and time-points. The Confusion Assessment Method-ICU with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale to assess sedation was the most common measure used to ascertain delirium (51, 35%). Measurement generally began at randomization or ICU admission, and lasted from 1 to 30 days, ICU/hospital discharge. Frequency of measurement was highly variable with daily measurement and greater than daily measurement reported for 36% and 37% of studies, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified substantial heterogeneity and multiplicity of outcome selection and measurement in published studies. These data will inform the consensus building stage of a core outcome set to inform delirium research in the critically ill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32205622     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  2 in total

Review 1.  Heterogeneity in design and analysis of ICU delirium randomized trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Colantuoni; Mounica Koneru; Narjes Akhlaghi; Ximin Li; Mohamed D Hashem; Victor D Dinglas; Karin J Neufeld; Michael O Harhay; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  A core outcome set for studies evaluating interventions to prevent and/or treat delirium for adults requiring an acute care hospital admission: an international key stakeholder informed consensus study.

Authors:  Louise Rose; Lisa Burry; Meera Agar; Bronagh Blackwood; Noll L Campbell; Mike Clarke; John W Devlin; Jacques Lee; John C Marshall; Dale M Needham; Najma Siddiqi; Valerie Page
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 8.775

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.