Literature DB >> 32204028

Recent progress in the fabrication techniques of 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Mostafa Mabrouk1, Hanan H Beherei2, Diganta B Das3.   

Abstract

Significant advances have been made in the field of tissue engineering (TE), especially in the synthesis of three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds for replacing damaged tissues and organs in laboratory conditions. However, the gaps in knowledge in exploiting these techniques in preclinical trials and beyond and, in particular, in practical scenarios (e.g., replacing real body organs) have not been discussed well in the existing literature. Furthermore, it is observed in the literature that while new techniques for the synthesis of 3D TE scaffold have been developed, some of the earlier techniques are still being used. This implies that the advantages offered by a more recent and advanced technique as compared to the earlier ones are not obvious, and these should be discussed in detail. For example, one needs to be aware of the reason, if any, behind the superiority of traditional electrospinning technique over recent advances in 3D printing technique for the production of 3D scaffolds given the popularity of the former over the latter, indicated by the number of publications in the respective areas. Keeping these points in mind, this review aims to demonstrate the ongoing trend in TE based on the scaffold fabrication techniques, focusing mostly, on the two most widely used techniques, namely, electrospinning and 3D printing, with a special emphasis on preclinical trials and beyond. In this context, the advantages, disadvantages, flexibilities and limitations of the relevant techniques (electrospinner and 3D printer) are discussed. The paper also critically analyzes the applicability, restrictions, and future demands of these techniques in TE including their applications in generating whole body organs. It is concluded that combining these knowledge gaps with the existing body of knowledge on the preparation of laboratory scale 3D scaffolds, would deliver a much better understanding in the future for scientists who are interested in these techniques.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Keywords:  3D printing; Electrospinning; Scaffold preparation techniques; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32204028     DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.110716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl        ISSN: 0928-4931            Impact factor:   7.328


  11 in total

Review 1.  Advances on Hydrogels for Oral Science Research.

Authors:  Shengjia Ye; Bin Wei; Li Zeng
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-05-15

Review 2.  Electrospun nanofibrous membrane for biomedical application.

Authors:  Bomin Yan; Yiwen Zhang; Zhixiang Li; Pinghui Zhou; Yingji Mao
Journal:  SN Appl Sci       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 3.  Alginate: Enhancement Strategies for Advanced Applications.

Authors:  Alejandro Hurtado; Alaa A A Aljabali; Vijay Mishra; Murtaza M Tambuwala; Ángel Serrano-Aroca
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Advances in Engineering Human Tissue Models.

Authors:  Chrysanthi-Maria Moysidou; Chiara Barberio; Róisín Meabh Owens
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-28

5.  Fabrication and characterization of mechanically competent 3D printed polycaprolactone-reduced graphene oxide scaffolds.

Authors:  Amir Seyedsalehi; Leila Daneshmandi; Mohammed Barajaa; John Riordan; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  How Fiber Surface Topography Affects Interactions between Cells and Electrospun Scaffolds: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alex Lopez Marquez; Iván Emilio Gareis; Fernando José Dias; Christoph Gerhard; María Florencia Lezcano
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 7.  Main Applications and Recent Research Progresses of Additive Manufacturing in Dentistry.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Libo Wu; Jie Hu; Xiongming Zhou; Fei He; Li Wan; Shu-Ting Pan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Conventional and Recent Trends of Scaffolds Fabrication: A Superior Mode for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Islam M Adel; Mohamed F ElMeligy; Nermeen A Elkasabgy
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  3D Printed Gene-Activated Sodium Alginate Hydrogel Scaffolds.

Authors:  Maria A Khvorostina; Anton V Mironov; Irina A Nedorubova; Tatiana B Bukharova; Andrey V Vasilyev; Dmitry V Goldshtein; Vladimir S Komlev; Vladimir K Popov
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-07-06

10.  Powder 3D Printing of Bone Scaffolds with Uniform and Gradient Pore Sizes Using Cuttlebone-Derived Calcium Phosphate and Glass-Ceramic.

Authors:  Francesca Cestari; Yuejiao Yang; Janka Wilbig; Jens Günster; Antonella Motta; Vincenzo M Sglavo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 3.748

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.