Literature DB >> 32203820

Volume gradients in inner hair cell-auditory nerve fiber pre- and postsynaptic proteins differ across mouse strains.

Daniël O J Reijntjes1, Christine Köppl2, Sonja J Pyott3.   

Abstract

In different animal models, auditory nerve fibers display variation in spontaneous activity and response threshold. Functional and structural differences among inner hair cell ribbon synapses are believed to contribute to this variation. The relative volumes of synaptic proteins at individual synapses might be one such difference. This idea is based on the observation of opposing volume gradients of the presynaptic ribbons and associated postsynaptic glutamate receptor patches in mice along the pillar modiolar axis of the inner hair cell, the same axis along which fibers were shown to vary in their physiological properties. However, it is unclear whether these opposing gradients are expressed consistently across animal models. In addition, such volume gradients observed for separate populations of presynaptic ribbons and postsynaptic glutamate receptor patches suggest different relative volumes of these synaptic structures at individual synapses; however, these differences have not been examined in mice. Furthermore, it is unclear whether such gradients are limited to these synaptic proteins. Therefore, we analyzed organs of Corti isolated from CBA/CaJ, C57BL/6, and FVB/NJ mice using immunofluorescence, confocal microscopy, and quantitative image analysis. We find consistent expression of presynaptic volume gradients across strains of mice and inconsistent expression of postsynaptic volume gradients. We find differences in the relative volume of synaptic proteins, but these are different between CBA/CaJ mice, and C57BL/6 and FVB/NJ mice. We find similar results in C57BL/6 and FVB/NJ mice when using other postsynaptic density proteins (Shank1, Homer, and PSD95). These results have implications for the mechanisms by which volumes of synaptic proteins contribute to variations in the physiology of individual auditory nerve fibers and their vulnerability to excitotoxicity.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32203820     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.107933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  4 in total

1.  Auditory-nerve responses in mice with noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy.

Authors:  Kirupa Suthakar; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.974

2.  Preparation of the intact rodent organ of Corti for RNAscope and immunolabeling, confocal microscopy, and quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Daniel O J Reijntjes; J Lukas Breitzler; Dora Persic; Sonja J Pyott
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2021-05-24

3.  Loss of central mineralocorticoid or glucocorticoid receptors impacts auditory nerve processing in the cochlea.

Authors:  Philine Marchetta; Philipp Eckert; Robert Lukowski; Peter Ruth; Wibke Singer; Lukas Rüttiger; Marlies Knipper
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-02-26

4.  Maturation of Heterogeneity in Afferent Synapse Ultrastructure in the Mouse Cochlea.

Authors:  Shelby A Payne; Matthew S Joens; Heather Chung; Natalie Skigen; Adam Frank; Sonali Gattani; Kya Vaughn; Allison Schwed; Matt Nester; Atri Bhattacharyya; Guhan Iyer; Bethany Davis; Jason Carlquist; Honey Patel; James A J Fitzpatrick; Mark A Rutherford
Journal:  Front Synaptic Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.