Yingzhen Ma1, Yao Wu1, Jin Gyun Lee1, Lilin He2, Gernot Rother3, Anne-Laure Fameau4, William A Shelton1,5, Bhuvnesh Bharti1. 1. Cain Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, United States. 2. Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States. 3. Chemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States. 4. National Institute of French Agriculture Research, Nantes 44300, France. 5. Center for Computation and Technology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, United States.
Abstract
The crucial roles of the ionization state and counterion presence on the phase behavior of fatty acid in aqueous solutions are well-established. However, the effects of counterions on the adsorption and morphological state of fatty acid on nanoparticle surfaces are largely unknown. This knowledge gap exists due to the high complexity of the interactions between nanoparticles, counterions, and fatty acid molecules in aqueous solution. In this study, we use adsorption isotherms, small angle neutron scattering, and all-atom molecular dynamic simulations to investigate the effect of addition of ethanolamine as a counterion on the adsorption and self-assembly of decanoic acid onto aminopropyl-modified silica nanoparticles. We show that the morphology of the fatty acid assemblies on silica nanoparticles changes from discrete surface patches to a continuous bilayer by increasing concentration of the counterion. This morphological behavior of fatty acid on the oppositely charged nanoparticle surface alters the interfacial activity of the fatty acid-nanoparticle complex and thus governs the stability of the foam formed by the mixture. Our study provides new insights into the structure-property relationship of fatty acid-nanoparticle complexes and outlines a framework to program the stability of foams formed by mixtures of nanoparticles and amphiphiles.
The crucial roles of the ionization state and counterion presence on the phase behavior of fatty acid in aqueous solutions are well-established. However, the effects of counterions on the adsorption and morphological state of fatty acid on nanoparticle surfaces are largely unknown. This knowledge gap exists due to the high complexity of the interactions between nanoparticles, counterions, and fatty acid molecules in aqueous solution. In this study, we use adsorption isotherms, small angle neutron scattering, and all-atom molecular dynamic simulations to investigate the effect of addition of ethanolamine as a counterion on the adsorption and self-assembly of decanoic acid onto aminopropyl-modified silica nanoparticles. We show that the morphology of the fatty acid assemblies on silica nanoparticles changes from discrete surface patches to a continuous bilayer by increasing concentration of the counterion. This morphological behavior of fatty acid on the oppositely charged nanoparticle surface alters the interfacial activity of the fatty acid-nanoparticle complex and thus governs the stability of the foam formed by the mixture. Our study provides new insights into the structure-property relationship of fatty acid-nanoparticle complexes and outlines a framework to program the stability of foams formed by mixtures of nanoparticles and amphiphiles.
The
aggregative adsorption of amphiphilic molecules on colloids
governs the optical properties, interfacial activity, and stability
of the particles in the dispersion.[1−6] The self-assembled state of amphiphilic molecules on colloidal particles
is dependent on the interaction between: (1) particle surface and
unadsorbed amphiphilic molecules, (2) amphiphilic molecules adsorbed
on the surface and unadsorbed molecules in bulk solution, and (3)
among the molecules adsorbed on the surface.[7−9] These interactions
determine the morphology of surface-adsorbed aggregates of amphiphilic
molecules and govern the interfacial activity of the colloidal particles
with adsorbed amphiphiles. The adsorption mechanism and morphology
of the surface aggregates formed by synthetic amphiphiles, such as
non-ionic surfactants, onto hydrophilic nanoparticles are well-known
and characterized.[10−12] However, the equilibrium morphology of natural amphiphiles,
such as fatty acids, adsorbed onto nanoparticles in the presence of
organic counterions and their impact on the interfacial activity of
nanoparticles are poorly understood. This lack in understanding is
due to the complexity of the phase behavior of fatty acid molecules
on the nanoparticles, which is highly dependent on the concentration
of counterions in the dispersion medium.[13,14]Fatty acids are a class of naturally occurring amphiphiles
consisting
of an aliphatic hydrocarbon chain and carboxylic acid polar head group.[15] The carboxylic acid head group can exist in
either the protonated (−COOH) or deprotonated (−COO–) state, which is primarily governed by the presence
of counterion molecules in solution.[16] The
concentration of the counterion in the solution also governs the morphology
of the self-assembled state of the fatty acid molecules and their
Kraft temperature. Previously, it has been shown that increasing the
fatty acid-to-counterion molar ratio in aqueous solution drives morphological
transitions in the self-assembled state of the fatty acids from disc-like
micelles, to multilamellar tubules, to discrete spherical micelles.[17,18] Despite the rich phase behavior of the fatty acid molecules in bulk,
the effects of the ionization state of fatty acids on their adsorption
onto hydrophilic nanoparticles remain unknown. The self-assembled
state and phase behavior of fatty acid in aqueous solution containing
nanoparticles are impacted by the chemical design of the fatty acid
molecules, size of the nanoparticles, and environmental parameters
such as temperature, salinity, and the presence of counterions.[19−21] Understanding the interactions governing the self-assembly and phase
behavior of fatty acids adsorbed at nanoparticles is critical to the
development of multifunctional materials with tunable interfacial
and bulk properties, such as foam stability and viscoelasticity.[22] In this study, we systematically probe the effect
of increasing counterion concentration on the adsorption and self-assembled
state of fatty acid molecules on the surface of hydrophilic nanoparticles,
and investigate its corresponding impact on the interfacial activity
of the fatty acid–nanoparticle complex.We use adsorption
isotherm, small angle neutron scattering (SANS),
and all-atom molecular dynamic (MD) simulations to understand the
effect of an increasing concentration of counterions on the adsorbed
amount, and the morphology of the fatty acid molecules formed at amine
functionalized hydrophilic nanoparticles. We use decanoic acid (C9H19COOH) and ethanolamine (HOCH2CH2NH2) as model fatty acid molecules and counterions,
respectively, and propyl amine (−C3H6NH2)-functionalized spherical silica (mSiO2) as model hydrophilic nanoparticles. We find that
the counterion-to-fatty acid molar ratio not only determines the amount
of fatty acid adsorbed on the silica nanoparticles but also governs
the morphology of the fatty acid assemblies formed at the mSiO2 surface. Furthermore, we demonstrate that
the morphological change of fatty acid at mSiO2 impacts the interfacial activity of the composite structure,
thus altering the stability of foam formed by the dispersion. This
study outlines the relationship of the counterion-tuned structure
of fatty acid assemblies on silica nanoparticles to the interfacial
activity of the composite structure, and provides insights into the
principle of designing nanomaterials with tunable foaming properties.
Results and Discussion
Nanoparticle Synthesis
and Characterization
Amine Functionalization
of Silica Nanoparticles
The propylamine-functionalized silica
nanoparticles were synthesized
by controlled surface modification of commercially available Ludox-TMA
colloidal silica (Sigma-Aldrich). The silica nanoparticle dispersion
was dialyzed for 7 days using ultrapure water with a resistivity of
18.2 MΩ-cm, changing water every day to remove any undesired
foreign molecules in the dispersion. In a typical synthesis, 22.2
g of 27 wt % Ludox-TMA dispersion was mixed with 12 mL of acetic acid
and 3.8 mL of deionized water (Figure a and Figure S1). The mixture
was transferred into a round-bottom flask, fitted with a reflux condenser,
and heated to 80 °C. After 30 min of equilibration, 0.7 mL of
(3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) was added to the flask containing
the mixture with constant stirring. The mixture was reacted for 16
h at 80 °C under reflux. The dispersion containing modified silica
nanoparticles was removed from the flask and dialyzed for 24 h using
deionized water at pH 4. The larger aggregates from the dialyzed mSiO2 were removed by filtering it through a
syringe filter with a pore size of 220 nm. The pH of the filtered
nanoparticle solution was adjusted to 4, and the mSiO2 dispersion was stored at 4 °C.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic representation
of the synthesis of aminopropyl functionalized
silica nanoparticles (mSiO2). The aminopropyl
groups (−C3H6NH2) were chemically
grafted onto commercially available Ludox-TMA silica nanoparticles
and then protonated to −C3H6NH3+. (b) Experimental SAXS profiles (blue circles) for mSiO2 nanoparticles in deionized water at pH
7. Solid line represents the fit to the experimental data using the
form factor of polydisperse spheres. Inset: SEM image showing spherical
shape of mSiO2 nanoparticles. The scale
bar in the inset is 100 nm. (c) Zeta potential–pH titration
curve for the mSiO2 nanoparticles in deionized
water. The red line at pH 4.9 represents the pKa of the carboxylic acid group of decanoic acid in water. The
black line indicates the isoelectric point of mSiO2 nanoparticles.
(a) Schematic representation
of the synthesis of aminopropyl functionalized
silica nanoparticles (mSiO2). The aminopropyl
groups (−C3H6NH2) were chemically
grafted onto commercially available Ludox-TMAsilica nanoparticles
and then protonated to −C3H6NH3+. (b) Experimental SAXS profiles (blue circles) for mSiO2 nanoparticles in deionized water at pH
7. Solid line represents the fit to the experimental data using the
form factor of polydisperse spheres. Inset: SEM image showing spherical
shape of mSiO2 nanoparticles. The scale
bar in the inset is 100 nm. (c) Zeta potential–pH titration
curve for the mSiO2 nanoparticles in deionized
water. The red line at pH 4.9 represents the pKa of the carboxylic acid group of decanoic acid in water. The
black line indicates the isoelectric point of mSiO2 nanoparticles.
Characterization of mSiO2
The mSiO2 nanoparticles
were characterized for their size and surface charge by small angle
X-ray scattering (SAXS), a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and
zeta potential-pH titration. The bulk size characterization of mSiO2 was performed using SAXS (Xenocs Xeuss
2.0). The SAXS profiles for 0.1% by weight of mSiO2 at pH 7 is shown in Figure b where I(q) is the
scattering intensity, and q is the scattering momentum
transfer related to the X-ray wavelength (λ) and scattering
angle (θ) as . The experimentally measured
scattering
profile is fitted using a spherical form factor model with log-normal
particle size distribution (Figure b). The form factor model is effective in representing
the scattering at q > 0.2 nm–1 but
fails in the region q < 0.2 nm–1. This disagreement between the experimental data and form factor
model is caused by weak aggregation of the nanoparticles at pH 7 (zeta
potential < +15 mV, Figure c), which results in an increase in scattering intensity at q < 0.2 nm–1. Despite the presence
of the structure factor, the form factor provides the accurate nanoparticle
diameter of 30 nm, with a polydispersity index of 0.1, which agrees
with SEM imaging (Figure b, inset). The surface charge on mSiO2 is quantified using zeta potential measurement (Litesizer
500, Anton Paar GmbH) as a function of pH (Figure c). The experimental results show that the
zeta potential of mSiO2 changes from +42.7
to −31.1 mV as pH is increased from 2 to 11, and the isoelectric
point of mSiO2 nanoparticles is pH ∼8.5.
The isoelectric point of the native silica nanoparticles is pH ∼2,[23] but it changes to pH ∼8.5 upon surface
modification with propylamine surface groups (Figure S1). The change in the isoelectric point of silica
nanoparticles upon surface chemical modification is attributed to
the protonation of the aminopropyl functional group[24] at pH <8. The positive charge on the surface of mSiO2 at pH < 8 is key in directing the adsorption and corresponding
self-assembled state of the fatty acid molecules on the surface of mSiO2 nanoparticles.
Adsorption of Fatty Acid on mSiO2
In this study, we use decanoic acid as model
fatty acid and control its protonation state using ethanolamine as
a counterion. We define the counterion-to-fatty acid molar ratio (R) as the ratio of the total number of ethanolamine to the
fatty acid molecules in the solution. The value of R is equivalent to the fraction of the fatty acid molecules in the
deprotonated state, i.e., where nCOO is the number of deprotonated fatty
acid molecules, and ntotal is the total
number of fatty acid molecules
in the solution. To understand the effect of the ionization state
of fatty acid on its interaction with mSiO2, we experimentally measure the adsorption isotherms of the decanoic
acid onto mSiO2 nanoparticles with R increasing from 0.05 to 1.0. The adsorption isotherms
were measured at pH 6, where the net charge on mSiO2 is positive and an electrostatic attraction exists between
the deprotonated carboxylate group of the fatty acid and protonated
propyl ammonium group on the surface of mSiO2 nanoparticles.The adsorption isotherms were measured
using a well-established solvent depletion method.[25] In a typical adsorption experiment, increasing amounts
of fatty acid at fixed R were added to 1 wt % mSiO2 aqueous dispersion. The pH was adjusted
to 6 by adding small amounts of 5 N aqueous HCl or NaOH solution.
The mixture was equilibrated at 20 °C for 24 h, and then mSiO2 with adsorbed fatty acid molecules was
removed by centrifuging the dispersions at 18,000 RCF for 2 h. Electrostatic
attraction between the oppositely charged fatty acid molecules and
silica surfaces further drives fatty acid-mediated aggregation of mSiO2 nanoparticles, thus destabilizing the dispersion.
The aspect of aggregation of mSiO2 nanoparticles
into fractal superstructures, while interesting, is beyond the scope
of this study focused on understanding the self-assembly of fatty
acid molecules on nanoparticles.Based on visual inspection
of the sample and known adsorption mechanism
of amphiphiles,[26] fatty acid molecules
in their mixture with counterions and mSiO2 are present in three distinct forms, namely, (a) undissolved fatty
acid gel (cu, protonated form, −COOH),
(b) unadsorbed fatty acid in bulk solution (co, deprotonated form, −COO–), and
(c) adsorbed fatty acid onto mSiO2 (cads, deprotonated form, −COO–) as shown in Figure a. The fractions of total fatty acid concentration (ct) existing in these three forms were determined by systematically
separating the mixture using centrifugation. The mass density of the
native protonated fatty acid is ∼ 0.893 g/cm3;[27] therefore, the concentration of fatty acid in
the undissolved gel form (cu) was determined
by physically collecting the pellets floating on the liquid–air
interface in the vial after centrifugation. The pellets were dried
overnight at room temperature to ensure complete evaporation of water.
The concentration of undissolved fatty acid decreases with increasing R, as shown in Figure S2. The
concentration of fatty acid dissolved in aqueous solution but unadsorbed
onto mSiO2 was determined by first carefully
removing the aqueous supernatant from the centrifuged sample and then
measuring the concentration of the fatty acid in the supernatant using
surface tension. The surface tension of the supernatant was measured
using an optical tensiometer (Attension Theta, Biolin Scientific)
where the shape of the pendant droplet is analyzed using Young–Laplace
equation.[26,28,29] The relationship
between surface tension and concentration of the fatty acid in the
supernatant was determined for different solutions with known concentrations,
yielding a calibration curve, as shown in Figure S3. When the unknown concentration of deprotonated fatty acid
in the supernatant was higher than critical micellization concentration
(CMC) of the molecules, the unknown concentration was determined by
systematic dilutions until the measured surface tension is below its
characteristic value at CMC. The net unknown concentration of the
supernatant was calculated by multiplying the concentration estimated
for the diluted sample (from surface tension calibration curve) and
the dilution factor. It should be noted that fatty acid molecules
only in the deprotonated state (−COO–) are
surface-active and reduce the surface tension, as shown in Figures S3 and S4. Therefore, the surface tension
measurements enable selective determination of concentration of fatty
acid molecules in the dissolved (deprotonated) state.
Figure 2
(a) Schematic of the
solvent depletion method used for experimentally
measuring the adsorption isotherm of fatty acid molecules onto mSiO2 nanoparticles. Here, the acronym FA refers
to fatty acid. (b) Adsorption isotherm for fatty acid on mSiO2 at increasing counterion-to-fatty acid molar ratio
(R). The discrete points are experimental values,
and solid lines are fits using Langmuir adsorption model given by eq . (c) Maximum surface excess
Γmax and (d) adsorption constant Kads of fatty acid on mSiO2 with increasing R, as obtained by fitting the experimental
data using Langmuir model.
(a) Schematic of the
solvent depletion method used for experimentally
measuring the adsorption isotherm of fatty acid molecules onto mSiO2 nanoparticles. Here, the acronym FA refers
to fatty acid. (b) Adsorption isotherm for fatty acid on mSiO2 at increasing counterion-to-fatty acid molar ratio
(R). The discrete points are experimental values,
and solid lines are fits using Langmuir adsorption model given by eq . (c) Maximum surface excess
Γmax and (d) adsorption constant Kads of fatty acid on mSiO2 with increasing R, as obtained by fitting the experimental
data using Langmuir model.The amount of fatty acid molecules adsorbed onto mSiO2 nanoparticles (Γ) is obtained from the equation
Γ = cadsV/ms where V is the volume of
the aqueous solution, ms is the mass of mSiO2 in bulk solution, cads = ct – (co + cu) is the concentration
of fatty acid molecules adsorbed onto mSiO2, ct is the total concentration of fatty
acid, co is the concentration of dissolved
but unadsorbed fatty acid in the solution, and cu is the concentration of undissolved fatty acid molecules
(Figure a). It should
be noted that for R = 1, the value of cu = 0, i.e., all fatty acid exists in dissolved states,
i.e., unadsorbed and adsorbed states on nanoparticles (deprotonated
form, −COO–) and for R =
0, c = c, i.e., the fatty acid molecules exist only as an undissolved gel
state (protonated form, −COOH). The adsorption isotherms of
fatty acid molecules bound to mSiO2 nanoparticles
at five R values are shown in Figure b. At all tested counterion concentrations,
the amount of fatty acid adsorbed on mSiO2 shows an initial increase followed by a plateau, which is a characteristic
of the molecular adsorption on a surface with a fixed number of binding
sites.[26] These experimentally measured
adsorption isotherms can be represented by a Langmuir adsorption model
given as[30]Here, Γ is the amount of fatty
acid adsorbed onto mSiO2, Γmax is the maximum surface
excess of fatty acid, co is the equilibrium
concentration of dissolved but unadsorbed fatty acid in bulk, Kads is the equilibrium adsorption constant,
which is proportional to the binding affinity of the fatty acid molecules
to mSiO2 nanoparticles. The Langmuir model
is the simplest two-parameter model that allows representing the maximum
amount of fatty acid adsorbed and its binding affinity for mSiO2 in terms of Γmax and Kads.The experimental adsorption isotherm
data are fitted using the
Langmuir model given in eq (Figure b)
keeping Γmax and Kads as free fit parameters. The values of Γmax and Kads as obtained by the least square fitting
of experimental data with increasing R are shown
in Figure c,d. We
find that Γmax increases (nearly) linearly with increasing R. The values of Γmax increased from 1.0
to 16.0 μmol/m2 (Figure c) as R increased from 0.05
to 1.0, i.e., the number of fatty acid molecules adsorbed onto mSiO2 increases with increasing R. The observed linear increase in the maximum surface excess of fatty
acid molecules can be attributed to the linear increase in the concentration
of deprotonated (negatively charged carboxylate) fatty acid molecules
with increasing R.[13]We find that Kads shows only a slight
increase from 0.4 to 1.4 mM–1 with R increasing from 0.05 to 1.0. This slight increase in Kads with R is an indicative of the small
increase in adsorption free energy of the fatty acid molecules at
the mSiO2 surface. It should be noted
that because pH of the aqueous solution was kept fixed (at pH 6),
the surface charge of mSiO2 can be approximated
as constant for all R. Assuming that the charging
of the silica and fatty acid molecules involves monovalent ions only
and that the surface change density of mSiO2 at pH 6 is low, the free energy of adsorption can be calculated
from Kads as ΔGadso = – NAkBT ln(55.5 × Kads) where NA is the Avogadro number, kB is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the temperature.[31,32] We find that the magnitude of ΔGadso increases from
−24.2 to −27.4 kJ/mol upon increasing R from 0.05 to 1. Two key conclusions drawn from these values are:
first, the value of ΔGadso is lower than the adsorption
free energy of cationic surfactants on the silica surface. This lowering
of adsorption free energy in our case can be attributed to the smaller
surface charge density on the synthesized mSiO2 nanoparticles.[33] Second, only
a small increase in ΔG highlights that the chemical nature of the functional group
binding to mSiO2 at low and high R values is similar, which is the carboxylate group of the
decanoic acid. The adsorption isotherms show that the amount of fatty
acid bound onto mSiO2 increases but do
not provide any insights into the self-assembled state and morphology
of the surface-adsorbed molecules. To uncover the self-assembled state
of the fatty acid on mSiO2 nanoparticles,
we perform small angle neutron scattering analysis for dispersions
of mSiO2 with adsorbed fatty acid, as
discussed in the next section.
Morphology
of Fatty Acid Adsorbed onto mSiO2
Small Angle Neutron Scattering Experiments
An increase
in the counterion-to-fatty acid molar ratio leads to
an increase in the amount of fatty acid molecules adsorbed on mSiO2 nanoparticles. This increase in surface
adsorption of fatty acid molecules drives a morphological change in
the fatty acid assemblies formed on the surface of mSiO2 nanoparticles. Here, we characterize the morphology
of the fatty acid molecules on mSiO2 using
SANS. The experiments were carried out at silica contrast-matched
condition where 62.5 wt % deuterium oxide (D2O) and 37.5
wt % H2O were used as the solvent.[10,12] Therefore, the neutron scattering originated solely from the fatty
acid molecules and their assemblies in the solution. The SANS experiments
were performed at ORNL HFIR facility using the GP-SANS instrument
with pinhole collimation at a neutron wavelength of 6 Å. Further
details about the SANS experiments can be found in previous publications.[34,35]The SANS experiments were performed at constant total concentrations
of fatty acid and mSiO2, with increasing
counterion-to-fatty acid molar ratio from R = 0.05
to 1.0. The maximum concentration of fatty acid molecules adsorbed
onto silica at R = 1.0 is given bywhere Cmax is
the total concentration of fatty acid at Γmax, A and W are the specific
surface area and weight of mSiO2 nanoparticles
in the solution, respectively, and Vtotal is the total volume of the sample. Here, the fatty acid concentration
was 0.03 M, which was equivalent to the 0.5 Cmax at R = 1.0 (Figure b). Therefore, for SANS at R < 1.0 the fatty acid existed in three states as discussed in
the previous section (Figure a). The undissolved fatty acid floats on the surface of the
solution; therefore, the incoming neutron beam selectively probes
the protonated fatty acid in the aqueous solution (both adsorbed and
unadsorbed). The SANS profiles for mSiO2 with adsorbed fatty acid under silica contrast-matched conditions
with increasing R, at pH 6 and 20 °C, are shown
in Figure a. The mSiO2 nanoparticles in the presence of fatty
acid exist as aggregates and tend to phase separate. During our SANS
measurements, these aggregates settle and only a small unknown fraction
of the particles with adsorbed fatty acid remain in the neutron beam.
Because of the lack of information of the exact amount of the silica–fatty
acid composite in the neutron beam, the scattering intensity is represented
in arbitrary units. The curves show an increase in the low-q (< 0.15 nm–1) scattering with I(q) ∝ q–2. This
proportional increase in the scattering intensity is likely a combination
of the scattering due to the fatty acid-mediated aggregation of mSiO2 nanoparticles, and the presence of fatty
acid gel phase clusters in the solution. The SANS profiles also show
enhancement of the primary form factor oscillation at q ∼ 0.15 nm–1 with increasing R. Additionally, the primary minima show a slight shift to higher q values upon increasing R (Figure b), indicating a decrease in
the size of fatty acid assemblies on mSiO2 nanoparticles. Detailed characteristics of self-assemblies formed
by molecules on nanoparticles can be obtained by fitting the experimental
SANS data to theoretical form factor models. In our case, such model
dependent analysis is not feasible because of too many unknown and
unconstrained fit parameters. Therefore, we first perform model independent
analysis of the SANS data using Porod’s law and determine the
change in the surface-to-volume ratio of the fatty acid assemblies
with increasing R. According to Porod’s law,
the scattering intensity at large q (→ ∞)
is represented as[36] where Δρ is the scattering
length density contrast between the scattering object and surrounding
medium, and is the surface area-to-volume ratio of
the scattering object. Analyses of our SANS data (Figure S5) show approximately 10 times increase in the upon increasing R from
0.05 to 1.0. This increase in surface-to-volume ratio indicates a
significant decrease in the size of self-assembled structures formed
by fatty acid, highlighting a phase transition of fatty acid from
the bulk gel phase to surface-adsorbed layer upon increasing counterion
concentration. Note that since scattering intensity is in arbitrary
units, the observed increase in the values of with increasing R only
represents qualitative changes. A complete model-dependent SANS data
analysis is limited due to the fatty acid-induced aggregation of mSiO2 nanoparticles and corresponding emergence
of the structure factor in the scattering profile, which requires
additional parameters. Therefore, instead of direct fitting the experimental
data, we systematically simulate the SANS profiles, which provide
a qualitative information on the morphology of the assemblies formed
by fatty acid molecules on mSiO2 nanoparticles.
Figure 3
(a) SANS
profiles for fatty acid molecules adsorbed on mSiO2 nanoparticles in H2O/D2O mixture matching
the scattering length density of silica. The profiles
were measured at increasing R from 0.05 to 1.0. The
curves are shifted by a constant factor of 10 for better visualization.
(b) Zoomed-in plot of the scattering intensity from q = 0.07 to 1 nm–1. The primary minima of SANS profile
shifts to higher q values upon increasing R, indicating a decrease in the characteristic size of the
self-assemblies formed by fatty acid molecules on mSiO2 upon increasing counterion concentration. (c, d)
Simulated SANS profiles using spherical shell and raspberry-like form
factor models, respectively. The spherical shell form factor model
provides poor representation of the experimental data (shown in (a))
both qualitatively and quantitatively. The primary oscillation of
raspberry-like form factor model qualitatively represents the experimental
SANS data and captures the change in the morphology of adsorbed fatty
acid. The inserts in (c) and (d) are the respective conceptual schematics
of the used form factor models.
(a) SANS
profiles for fatty acid molecules adsorbed on mSiO2 nanoparticles in H2O/D2O mixture matching
the scattering length density of silica. The profiles
were measured at increasing R from 0.05 to 1.0. The
curves are shifted by a constant factor of 10 for better visualization.
(b) Zoomed-in plot of the scattering intensity from q = 0.07 to 1 nm–1. The primary minima of SANS profile
shifts to higher q values upon increasing R, indicating a decrease in the characteristic size of the
self-assemblies formed by fatty acid molecules on mSiO2 upon increasing counterion concentration. (c, d)
Simulated SANS profiles using spherical shell and raspberry-like form
factor models, respectively. The spherical shell form factor model
provides poor representation of the experimental data (shown in (a))
both qualitatively and quantitatively. The primary oscillation of
raspberry-like form factor model qualitatively represents the experimental
SANS data and captures the change in the morphology of adsorbed fatty
acid. The inserts in (c) and (d) are the respective conceptual schematics
of the used form factor models.Previous studies have shown that amphiphilic molecules can adsorb
onto nanoparticles in two morphological states, namely, continuous
layers or discrete patches.[10] To investigate
which of the two morphologies is formed by fatty acid molecules on mSiO2, we test the applicability of the spherical
shell and raspberry-like form factor models in representing the experimental
SANS profiles. The spherical shell model represents the formation
of a continuous layer of fatty acid on mSiO2 nanoparticles.[2] Here, we simulate the
SANS profiles using a shell model with a fixed core radius of 15 nm
with a 0.1 polydispersity index (Figure b) and increasing the shell thickness from
0.6 to 3.0 nm (Figure c). These thickness values are used because of the characteristic
length of the decanoic acid molecule, which is 1.2 nm;[37] therefore, 1.2 nm and 2.4 nm correspond to continuous
homogeneous monolayer and bilayer structures, respectively. We find
that the primary oscillation at q ∼ 0.25 nm–1, a characteristic of the shell structure, is present
in all simulated cases, which is in qualitative disagreement with
the experimental SANS profiles (Figure a,b) for R < 0.5. The experiments
show the presence of a smeared oscillation at R <
0.5. This qualitative mismatch between the experimental and simulated
SANS profiles suggests that the self-assembled state of the fatty
acid on mSiO2 is more complex than a continuous
shell of fatty acid molecules formed on nanoparticles.The second
possible morphological state of fatty acid on mSiO2 nanoparticles is discrete patches. Here,
we test the presence of such configuration of fatty acid on the nanoparticles
by simulating the scattering profile using a raspberry-like form factor.
The model represents the form factor of a large sphere with small
spheres randomly adsorbed on its surface.[38] The total scattering intensity of such a raspberry-like structure
with a core particle contrast-matched with the continuous medium is
given as[38−40]where N is the
number of
small spheres of radius rs, volume Vs and scattering contrast Δρ adsorbed
onto the core particle, ϕl is the volume fraction
of the core particle of radius rl, volume Vl, and q is the scattering
vector (see the Supporting Information for
detailed derivation). The raspberry-like form factor model accounts
for all the self-correlation and cross-correlation for small spheres
randomly adsorbed onto a larger sphere.[38] The simulated SANS profiles for a contrast-matched sphere with an
increasing number of surface-adsorbed smaller spheres are shown in Figure d. The profiles are
simulated for core particle radius rl =
15 nm, rs = 4 nm with increasing N from 12 to 200. The simulated curves using raspberry-like
form factor show an oscillation in the range 0.15 < q < 0.3 nm–1. This oscillation is the signature
of the characteristic correlation distance between the surface adsorbed
small spheres. The oscillation gets pronounced upon increasing N because of the increasing correlation in spatial distribution
of the surface-adsorbed particles (fatty acid in our case), which
is the characteristic diameter of the core particle (Figure d). The observed behavior of
smearing of the primary oscillation at low N is characteristic
of the nature of the surface adsorbed structures. At large N, the surface assembly of fatty acid resembles the continuous
layer, and the spherical shell and raspberry-like form factor models
yield similar results (Figure b,c). We acknowledge that the raspberry-like form factor is
strictly applicable only in the case of spherical particles adsorbed
onto a larger sphere, the model qualitatively captures the effect
of the discrete nature of the surface-adsorbed assemblies on the scattering
profile, especially at low surface loadings. In our experiments of
fatty acid adsorbed on mSiO2, we observe
similar smearing of the primary form factor oscillation at R < 0.25, highlighting the discrete nature of the fatty
acid assemblies formed on mSiO2 nanoparticles.
Upon increasing the counterion concentration to R above 0.50, the oscillation becomes pronounced, which agrees with
the continuous layer of fatty acid molecules on the nanoparticles.
At 0.25 < R < 0.50, the SANS profile shows
a behavior intermediate between discrete patches and continuous layer,
which is critical in programming the interfacial binding of the fatty
acid-nanoparticle complex (discussed in section ). In summary, the SANS shows that the
morphology of the fatty acid adsorbed on the mSiO2 nanoparticles changes from discrete patches to the continuous
layer upon increasing R. While the origin of such
morphological transitions of the fatty acid self-assemblies is not
clear from SANS data, molecular dynamic simulations can provide detailed
insight into the assembly process (discussed below).
Molecular Dynamic Simulations
The
addition of the counterion (ethanolamine) drives a morphological change
in the self-assembled state of fatty acid onto mSiO2 nanoparticles. We use molecular dynamics (MD) simulations
to understand the mechanism of self-assembly of fatty acid molecules
on the surface of mSiO2. All simulations
were performed using GROMACS 4.6.3[41] and
visualized in VMD.[42] In our simulations,
the amount of fatty acid was kept constant, and the counterion molar
ratio was systematically increased from R = 0.1 to
1.0. More details about the simulation setup are shown in Table S1. In a typical simulation run, a mixture
of unionized (protonated) fatty acid and deprotonated fatty acid with
protonated counterion molecules corresponding to different R values was randomly placed above the mSiO2 surface. The mixture together with the mSiO2 surface was solvated in a water box using the TIP3P
model.[43] Energy minimization followed by
500-ps NVT pre-equilibration using a V-rescale thermostat[44] was performed to stabilize the temperature of
the simulation box to 298 K. Next, to stabilize the pressure to 1
bar, 500-ps NPT simulations were carried out using the leapfrog algorithm[45] with a time step of 0.1 fs, and the Parrinello–Rahman
thermostat[46] is applied until the simulation
box was equilibrated at 1 bar. Finally, the simulations were performed
in NPT ensemble for 20 ns for data collection. A particle–particle
particle–mesh algorithm with an analytical derivative (P3M-AD)[47] is used for long-range electrostatic interactions.Snapshots extracted from the last step of the equilibration trajectory
at various R values are shown in Figure a–f. We find that the
fatty acid molecules assemble as a large patch at R < 0.2 and form a continuous layer at R = 1.0.
In the range of 0.2 < R < 1.0, several discrete
assemblies are formed on mSiO2. Apart
from the shape, the mean size of surface assemblies referenced to
the bare silica surface, Dh is plotted
as a function of R in Figure g. At low counterion addition (at R = 0.1), a single large assembly is bound to mSiO2 via negatively charged carboxylate ions highlighted
as red spheres (Figure a). As R is increased to 0.5 (Figure d), the bulky assembly decomposes into two
small patches with one of them being a bilayer. The decomposition
and spreading process of fatty acid assemblies at R = 0.5 leads to decrease of Dh as shown
in Figure g. As R is further increased above 0.5 (R = 0.7
and 1.0), a continuous layer of fatty acid structure can be observed
as shown in Figure e,f. The decrease of Dh upon increasing R from 0.1 to 1.0 (i.e., a decrease in the size of the self-assembled
surface aggregates of fatty acid on mSiO2) is in agreement with the shift of the primary form factor oscillation
in the SANS profile to higher wave vector as shown in Figure b.
Figure 4
(a)–(f) Snapshots
of equilibrated adsorbed state of fatty
acid molecules on mSiO2 surface at different
counterion-to-fatty acid molar ratios, R, increasing
from 0.1 to 1.0. The dashed line is a reference line showing the height
of the largest assembly at R = 0.1, Dh, max. Functional groups (propyl ammonium ions)
and counterion molecules (ethanolamine) are drawn as grey licorice
bonds. Bare silica is shown in grey solid van der Waals spheres. For
fatty acid molecules, hydrogen atoms are hidden. All atoms in fatty
acid molecules are colored in cyan, except the oxygen in the carboxylate
ion is colored in red. Water and chloride molecules are not shown
here for clarity. At R = 0.1, a large cluster of
fatty acid with discrete negative charges is adsorbed on positively
charged mSiO2 surface. As R is increased, the large assembly decomposes and tends to spread
on mSiO2 surface, inducing a decrease
in the size of surface aggregates, Dh.
(g) Mean size of fatty acid assemblies formed on mSiO2 surface, Dh as a function
of R, and the inset is the schematic representation
of Dh. (h) Electrostatic interaction, Eelec between fatty acid assembly and mSiO2 surface and (i) van der Waals interaction
between fatty acid molecules at different R values.
In the Figure, FA refers to fatty acid.
(a)–(f) Snapshots
of equilibrated adsorbed state of fatty
acid molecules on mSiO2 surface at different
counterion-to-fatty acid molar ratios, R, increasing
from 0.1 to 1.0. The dashed line is a reference line showing the height
of the largest assembly at R = 0.1, Dh, max. Functional groups (propyl ammonium ions)
and counterion molecules (ethanolamine) are drawn as grey licorice
bonds. Bare silica is shown in grey solid van der Waals spheres. For
fatty acid molecules, hydrogen atoms are hidden. All atoms in fatty
acid molecules are colored in cyan, except the oxygen in the carboxylate
ion is colored in red. Water and chloride molecules are not shown
here for clarity. At R = 0.1, a large cluster of
fatty acid with discrete negative charges is adsorbed on positively
charged mSiO2 surface. As R is increased, the large assembly decomposes and tends to spread
on mSiO2 surface, inducing a decrease
in the size of surface aggregates, Dh.
(g) Mean size of fatty acid assemblies formed on mSiO2 surface, Dh as a function
of R, and the inset is the schematic representation
of Dh. (h) Electrostatic interaction, Eelec between fatty acid assembly and mSiO2 surface and (i) van der Waals interaction
between fatty acid molecules at different R values.
In the Figure, FA refers to fatty acid.The assembled state of fatty acid molecules is governed by (a)
electrostatic attraction between the deprotonated fatty acid molecules
(carboxylate ions) and the mSiO2 surface,
and (b) the van der Waals attraction between the hydrocarbon tails
of the neighboring fatty acid molecules on the particle surface. To
understand the driving force that triggers the morphological change,
the electrostatic interaction[47] (Eelec) between fatty acid and mSiO2 and the van der Waals interaction (EvdW) among fatty acid alkyl chains at different R values are calculated and shown in Figure h,i, respectively. At R <
0.2, a small fraction of fatty acid molecules exist in the deprotonated
state and adsorb onto mSiO2 by an electrostatic
attraction. In our simulations, we find that at R = 0.1, the fatty acid assembly is composed of 4 deprotonated fatty
acid molecules and 66 fatty acid molecules, and the weakly negative-charged
portions of the surface aggregate serve as adsorption sites, immobilizing
the bulky assembly at the positive-charged sites. At R > 0.2, an increasing number of deprotonated fatty acid molecules
are bound to mSiO2 via an electrostatic
attraction (red spheres in Figure a). At R = 0.5, the number of deprotonated
fatty acid molecules is equal to that of protonated fatty acid molecules.
The electrostatic interaction between fatty acid and mSiO2 and the van der Waals attraction between the hydrocarbon
chains of the molecules are both significant. Therefore, small fatty
acid assemblies comprising both protonated and deprotonated fatty
acid molecules are adsorbed onto the mSiO2 surface where the deprotonated fatty acid molecules act as electrostatic
linkers to mSiO2. For R > 0.7, the majority of fatty acid molecules are present in their
carboxylate forms. The mSiO2-bound deprotonated
fatty acid molecules first form a packed monolayer by the lateral
organization of the alkyl chains via van der Waals attraction, and
the excess deprotonated fatty acid molecules are then packed to the
monolayer to form a thin bilayer. Thus, the increased Eelec between fatty acid assemblies and mSiO2 together with decreased EvdW between fatty acid molecules drives the morphological transition
of fatty acid assembly from a large patch to a thin bilayer upon increasing R. These observations on the morphological transition of
fatty acid molecules on mSiO2 nanoparticles
with increasing R agree with the SANS experiments
(see section ).
Foam Stability in Fatty Acid–mSiO2 Aqueous Solution
The foam stability
of fatty acid soaps in aqueous solution is known to be related to
the morphology of fatty acid assemblies at the air–water interface.
However, the origin of superior foam observed in mixtures of oppositely
charged nanoparticles and amphiphiles is not well understood. Here,
we aim to interrelate the state of fatty acid assemblies formed on mSiO2 nanoparticles with their ability to stabilize
the air–water interface (i.e., foam). The stability of foams
formed by the mixture of fatty acid and mSiO2 with increasing R was tested at pH 6. A
typical foaming experiment was performed using an aqueous mixture
of 0.02 M fatty acid and 1.0 wt % mSiO2 with increasing R from 0.0 to 1.0. The used concentration
of fatty acid was equivalent to Γmax at R = 1.0. The foam was produced from the fatty acid and mSiO2 mixture by vigorous shaking, and it was kept undisturbed
at room temperature for 18 h. The change in the foam volume of the
mixture after 18 h is monitored using digital imaging as shown in Figure a. The stability
of the foam produced by the fatty acid–mSiO2 mixture at a given R is quantified using
a foam stability parameter, S, represented as S = vfinal/vinitial where vinitial and vfinal are the volumes of foam immediately after
shaking and after 18 h of equilibration, respectively. For R = 0, the foam stability parameter was equal to zero since
no foam could be produced from the pure fatty acid and mSiO2 mixture without a counterion (Figure a,b). By adding a small amount of counterions
(R = 0.05), S increased from 0 to
0.7. By further increasing R, S reached
a plateau value around 0.8 from R = 0.2 to 0.5. For R > 0.5, S decreased to a final value
of
0.2 at R = 1 (Figure b). From these results, we define three regions of
foam stability. Region I corresponds to low foam stability for 0 < R < 0.05. Region II, 0.05 < R <
0.5, corresponds to high foam stability. Region III also corresponds
to a low foam stability regime for 0.5 < R <
1.0. We further investigate the origin of change in foam stability
with increasing R by microscale imaging of the bubbles
in all three identified regions for R = 0.05, 0.2,
and 1.0 (Figure c–e).
In region I, the bubbles were spherical, highlighting the large interfacial
tension between air and water. Transforming from region I to region
II, the shape of bubbles undergoes a change from smooth sphere to
rippled nonspherical. This change in the shape of the bubble upon
increasing R can be attributed to the adsorption
of the fatty acid–mSiO2 complex
at the air–water interface and corresponding interfacial jamming
of the nanoparticles. We believe that the adsorption of fatty acid
patches onto mSiO2 makes the nanoparticles
partially hydrophobic, driving its adsorption onto the air–water
interface. Following such interfacial adsorption, the shape transformation
of the bubbles is driven by two key factors: (a) jamming of nanoparticles
in the thin films between the bubbles upon liquid drainage hindering
the relaxation of the bubbles to spherical shape;[48,49] and (b) compression of liquid films by nanoparticle jamming causing
the buckled and rough appearance of the bubble surface.[50,51] Furthermore, we observe that the shape of bubbles recovers to a
smooth sphere from rippled perturbed sphere upon increasing R to 1.0 (region III). It should be noted that no foam could
be formed by mixture of mSiO2 and the
counterion, highlighting the critical role of fatty acid in the foaming
process (Figure b,
squares).
Figure 5
(a) Photographs of the change in foam volume for the fatty acid–mSiO2 mixture with increasing counterion-to-fatty
acid molar ratio, R. (b) The change in foam stability
of mSiO2 and fatty acid aqueous solution
quantified using foam stability parameter, S as a
function of R. Three distinct regions of foam stability
with increasing R can be identified, namely, (I)
rapid increase, (II) constant, and (III) slow decrease (blue circles
and line). The foam stability parameter for mSiO2 aqueous solution in the absence of fatty acid remains 0 (black
squares) for all tested R values. (c)–(e)
Micrographs of bubbles formed at R = 0.05, R = 0.2, and R = 1.0, respectively, at
fixed mSiO2 and fatty acid concentration.
The images show that the bubbles become nonspherical with the increasing
amount of counterion and then recover to the spherical shape as more
counterions is added. The scale bars correspond to 20 μm. (f)
Schematics representing the mechanism of change in foam stability
of the fatty acid–mSiO2 mixtures
with increasing R.
(a) Photographs of the change in foam volume for the fatty acid–mSiO2 mixture with increasing counterion-to-fatty
acid molar ratio, R. (b) The change in foam stability
of mSiO2 and fatty acid aqueous solution
quantified using foam stability parameter, S as a
function of R. Three distinct regions of foam stability
with increasing R can be identified, namely, (I)
rapid increase, (II) constant, and (III) slow decrease (blue circles
and line). The foam stability parameter for mSiO2 aqueous solution in the absence of fatty acid remains 0 (black
squares) for all tested R values. (c)–(e)
Micrographs of bubbles formed at R = 0.05, R = 0.2, and R = 1.0, respectively, at
fixed mSiO2 and fatty acid concentration.
The images show that the bubbles become nonspherical with the increasing
amount of counterion and then recover to the spherical shape as more
counterions is added. The scale bars correspond to 20 μm. (f)
Schematics representing the mechanism of change in foam stability
of the fatty acid–mSiO2 mixtures
with increasing R.In region I, only a few patches of fatty acid molecules are present
at the mSiO2 surfaces (sections and 2.4), which induce enough amphiphilicity to adsorb at the air–water
interface. Therefore, hydrophilicity and weak amphiphilic characters
of the nanoparticles in region I resulted in the lack of foam stability.
In region II, the number of fatty acid patches at the particle surface
was enough to reach an appropriate contact angle value, which leads
to the adsorption of particles at the air–water interface.
The patchy particles formed a dense layer at the interface protecting
the bubbles against coalescence and coarsening due to jamming phenomenon,
thus leading to the observed stable foams. In the region III, the
fatty acid formed a continuous bilayer structure on the mSiO2 nanoparticle surface, leading to hydrophilic surface
and diminishing the interfacial activity of the fatty acid-nanoparticle
complex. This lack of interfacial activity of fatty acid–nanoparticle
complex destabilizes the air bubbles and leads to poor foam stability
(sections and 2.4). Thus, the fatty acid–mSiO2 nanoparticles stay in the liquid phase and sediment
to the bottom of solution due to the fatty acid-mediated heteroaggregation
of the mSiO2 nanoparticles (Figure a,e). This absence of nanoparticles
at the air–water interface spontaneously drives the bubble
coalescence, drainage, and coarsening without any physical or energetic
barrier(s). These foaming experiments highlight a direct relationship
between the fatty acid structure on mSiO2 and their interfacial property. We find that patches of fatty acid
on mSiO2 nanoparticles are necessary for
increasing the interfacial activity of the complex and enhancing the
corresponding foam stability. We show that the self-assembled state
of fatty acid molecules on mSiO2 directs
the interfacial activity of the composite nanostructure and the resulting
macroscopic properties such as foam stability. The strong correlation
between the self-assembled state of fatty acid molecules on the surface
of mSiO2 nanoparticles and foam stability
leads to the formation of programmable foams for which the stability
can be tuned by modifying R.
Conclusions
This study presents the effect of the counterion-to-fatty
acid
molar ratio, R, on the self-assembled state of fatty
acid molecules on aminopropyl-modified silica nanoparticles. We show
that the maximum amount of fatty acid that can be adsorbed on the mSiO2 increases with increasing R. The increase in the amount of fatty acid molecules adsorbed on
positively charged mSiO2 nanoparticles
(at pH 6) is driven by an increase in the number of negatively charged
deprotonated fatty acid molecules upon increasing R. The increase in the maximum surface excess of fatty acid on mSiO2 with increasing R drives
a morphological change in the self-assembled state of fatty acids
at the nanoparticle surface from discrete patches to the continuous
layer. The control over that morphological state of fatty acid on mSiO2 by changing R enables
programming the hydrophilic/hydrophobic characteristics of the fatty
acid–mSiO2 nanoparticle complex.
At low R, the fatty acid molecules form large discrete
patches on the surface of mSiO2, which
decompose and spread on mSiO2 to form
a continuous layer at high R, evidenced by the analysis
of SANS profiles and MD simulations. This morphological change is
induced by the increased electrostatic interaction between fatty acid
and mSiO2 along with the decreased van
der Waals interaction between fatty acid molecules upon increasing R. The self-assembled state of fatty acid on the surface
of mSiO2 is strongly correlated with the
interfacial activity of the complex. We demonstrate that the foam
stability of the mixture can be directed by altering the adsorbed
state of the fatty acid molecules onto mSiO2 by changing the counterion-to-fatty acid molar ratio. This study
provides a fundamental basis to comprehend the nontrivial effects
of counterions on morphological evolution and phase transition of
fatty acid assemblies formed on nanoparticles. Further work on such
modified silica nanoparticle and their dispersion with fatty acid
can facilitate new principles of designing ultrastable foams valuable
in cosmetics and food industries.[52,53]
Authors: Lynn M Foster; Andrew J Worthen; Edward L Foster; Jiannan Dong; Clarissa M Roach; Athena E Metaxas; Clifford D Hardy; Eric S Larsen; Jonathan A Bollinger; Thomas M Truskett; Christopher W Bielawski; Keith P Johnston Journal: Langmuir Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 3.882