Literature DB >> 32201879

Forecasting beef production and quality using large-scale integrated data from Brazil.

Vera Cardoso Ferreira Aiken1, Arthur Francisco Araújo Fernandes1, Tiago Luciano Passafaro1, Juliano Sabella Acedo2, Fábio Guerra Dias3, João Ricardo Rebouças Dórea4, Guilherme Jordão de Magalhães Rosa1,5.   

Abstract

With agriculture rapidly becoming a data-driven field, it is imperative to extract useful information from large data collections to optimize the production systems. We compared the efficacy of regression (linear regression or generalized linear regression [GLR] for continuous or categorical outcomes, respectively), random forests (RF) and multilayer neural networks (NN) to predict beef carcass weight (CW), age when finished (AS), fat deposition (FD), and carcass quality (CQ). The data analyzed contained information on over 4 million beef cattle from 5,204 farms, corresponding to 4.3% of Brazil's national production between 2014 and 2016. Explanatory variables were integrated from different data sources and encompassed animal traits, participation in a technical advising program, nutritional products sold to farms, economic variables related to beef production, month when finished, soil fertility, and climate in the location in which animals were raised. The training set was composed of information collected in 2014 and 2015, while the testing set had information recorded in 2016. After parameter tuning for each algorithm, models were used to predict the testing set. The best model to predict CW and AS was RF (CW: predicted root mean square error = 0.65, R2 = 0.61, and mean absolute error = 0.49; AS: accuracy = 28.7%, Cohen's kappa coefficient [Kappa] = 0.08). While the best approach for FD and CQ was GLR (accuracy = 45.7%, Kappa = 0.05, and accuracy = 58.7%, Kappa = 0.09, respectively). Across all models, there was a tendency for better performance with RF and regression and worse with NN. Animal category, nutritional plan, cattle sales price, participation in a technical advising program, and climate and soil in which animals were raised were deemed important for prediction of meat production and quality with regression and RF. The development of strategies for prediction of livestock production using real-world large-scale data will be core to projecting future trends and optimizing the allocation of resources at all levels of the production chain, rendering animal production more sustainable. Despite beef cattle production being a complex system, this analysis shows that by integrating different sources of data it is possible to forecast meat production and quality at the national level with moderate-high levels of accuracy.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brazil; beef; forecasting; large scale data; machine learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32201879      PMCID: PMC7183355          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  6 in total

1.  A snapshot of management practices and nutritional recommendations used by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil.

Authors:  D D Millen; R D L Pacheco; M D B Arrigoni; M L Galyean; J T Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 2.  Conceptual framework for investigating causal effects from observational data in livestock.

Authors:  Nora M Bello; Vera C Ferreira; Daniel Gianola; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Breeding and Genetics Symposium: inferring causal effects from observational data in livestock.

Authors:  G J M Rosa; B D Valente
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Generalized additive mixed model on the analysis of total transport losses of market-weight pigs1.

Authors:  Tiago L Passafaro; Denise Van de Stroet; Nora M Bello; Noel H Williams; Guilherme J M Rosa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review.

Authors:  Konstantinos G Liakos; Patrizia Busato; Dimitrios Moshou; Simon Pearson; Dionysis Bochtis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  BIG DATA ANALYTICS AND PRECISION ANIMAL AGRICULTURE SYMPOSIUM: Machine learning and data mining advance predictive big data analysis in precision animal agriculture.

Authors:  Gota Morota; Ricardo V Ventura; Fabyano F Silva; Masanori Koyama; Samodha C Fernando
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 3.159

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.