| Literature DB >> 32201700 |
Pankaj Kumar Mishra1, Rishi Dwivedi2, Charanjit Singh Dhillon2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional and radiological outcome of balloon kyphoplasty and to endorse the unilateral single balloon extrapedicular kyphoplasty as practically more feasible and safer method in comparison to the conventional methods.Entities:
Keywords: Balloon kyphoplasty; Compression fracture; Percutaneous; Uni-extrapedicular
Year: 2020 PMID: 32201700 PMCID: PMC7071935 DOI: 10.29252/beat-080106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bull Emerg Trauma ISSN: 2322-2522
Fig. 1A. Determination of starting point for procedure surface marking, affected, proximal and distal levels were marked, a line A was drawn perpendicular to midline bisecting the affected level as seen on C-arm. Starting point was located at a distance of X cm on line A, where X=distance of center of affected vertebral body from dorsal skin surface (measured preoperatively on axial CT images. (c) Figure showing measurement of segmental kyphosis and percentage anterior vertebral height. Percentage anterior vertebral ht. at affected level=2xb/(a+c)x100. B. Schematic representation; axial CT section of L1 vertebra showing that midpoint of the vertebra to be reached by inserting needle at 45°, if starting point was chosen as described before. C. Figure showing measurement of segmental kyphosis and percentage anterior vertebral height. Percentage anterior vertebral ht. at affected level=2xb/(a+c)x100
Fig. 2Operative technique for extrapedicular balloon kyphoplasty
Fig. 3Balloon inflation/end plate elevation and cementation technique
Fig. 4Frequency of vertebral involvement
Fig. 5Demographic depiction of sex ratio and age distribution
The pre-operative and post-operative values of anterior vertebral height, segmental kyphosis and VAS
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 50.33% | 22.81° | 6.8 |
|
| 79.61% | 8.54° | 2.4 |
| T=-12.08 | T=6.90 |
|
Comparison of demography, results and complications of our study with other studies
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 59 Patients, 19 males, 40 females | From 50.33% to 79.61% | From 22.81° to 8.54°=63% improvement | 6.8 to 2.4=4.4 | Asymptomatic cement leak in 15% cases |
|
| 187 patients 65 males, 122 females | From 52% to 74.5% | From 14.4° to 6.7°=53% improvement | 7.7 to 2.2=5.5 | Cement leak in 11.5% cases |
|
| 105 patients, 37 males, 68 females | NA | From 11.6° to 10.9°=6% improvement | 8.2 to 4.4=3.8 | 11 patients ( 10.4%) with minor complications |
|
| 135 patients | From 30.62% to 16. 19% (Loss of vertebral height) | 17.41° to 10.59°=39% improvement | 6.7 to 2.2=4.5 | 6 patients with cement embolism, 65 incidence of cement leak, 3 patients with adjacent level fracture |
|
| 117 patients | Significant restoration; >10% increase in 84% of patients | Asymptomatic cement extravasation in 11.3% patients |