| Literature DB >> 32201480 |
Nur Ili Hamizah Mustaffa1,2, Mariana Ribas-Ribas2, Hanne M Banko-Kubis2, Oliver Wurl2.
Abstract
For decades, the effect of surfactants in the sea-surface microlayer (SML) on gas transfer velocity (k) has been recognized; however, it has not been quantified under natural conditions due to missing coherent data on in situ k of carbon dioxide (CO2) and characterization of the SML. Moreover, a sea-surface phenomenon of wave-dampening, known as slicks, has been observed frequently in the ocean and potentially reduces the transfer of climate-relevant gases between the ocean and atmosphere. Therefore, this study aims to quantify the effect of natural surfactant and slicks on the in situ k of CO2. A catamaran, Sea Surface Scanner (S3), was deployed to sample the SML and corresponding underlying water, and a drifting buoy with a floating chamber was deployed to measure the in situ k of CO2. We found a significant 23% reduction of k above surfactant concentrations of 200 µg Teq l-1, which were common in the SML except for the Western Pacific. We conclude that an error of approximately 20% in CO2 fluxes for the Western Pacific is induced by applying wind-based parametrization not developed in low surfactant regimes. Furthermore, we observed an additional 62% reduction in natural slicks, reducing global CO2 fluxes by 19% considering known frequency of slick coverage. From our observation, we identified surfactant concentrations with two different end-members which lead to an error in global CO2 flux estimation if ignored.Entities:
Keywords: Norwegian fjords; Western Pacific; air–sea gas exchange; slick; surfactant
Year: 2020 PMID: 32201480 PMCID: PMC7069489 DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2019.0763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Math Phys Eng Sci ISSN: 1364-5021 Impact factor: 2.704
Figure 1.Distribution of in situ k660 versus wind bins (U10). The black dots are the average of k for each wind bin and the error bars are the standard error of the average for each wind bin. Quadratic regression of our study; k660 = 9.4 (±4.9) + 0.6 (±0.1) *U102.
Figure 2.Whisker box plot of in situ k660. (a) At different surfactant regimes and (b) at different wind regimes. Error bars represent 5–95% of median values. Cross symbols represent mean values, lines represent median values and black points represent the outliers. n, number of observations.
Figure 3.Scattered plots of k660 and surfactant concentrations in the SML. (a) k660 reduced by natural surfactant in the SML. The vertical line at 200 µg Teq l−1 indicates a breaking point of surfactant in the SML. (b) k660 reduced by surfactant during intensive slick of cyanobacteria bloom. Colour plot represents wind regimes. Error bars represent 10% of standard error of k660. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 4.Whisker box plot of k660 during cruise in the Western Pacific (FK161010). Box plots of (a) k660 and (b) surfactant concentrations in the SML at selected stations. Error bars represent 5–95% median values. Lines represent 50% median and cross symbols represent mean values. n, number of observations. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 5.Scattered plots of k660 and surfactant concentrations in the SML at different oceanic regimes. (a) North Atlantic, (b) Western Pacific, (c) offshore and (d) Norwegian fjords regimes. Colour plot represents wind regimes. Error bars represent 10% of standard error of k660. (Online version in colour.)